OT: Mystery on Ponape

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Lokasenna »

At least I think this is at Ponape, as our in-game map refers to it, near as I can tell. File this one under things I learned on the internet today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nan_Madol# ... nd_tourism
Carbon dating indicates that the construction of Nan Madol began around 1200 CE, while excavations show that the area may have been occupied as early as 200 BCE. Some probable quarry sites around the island have been identified, but the exact origin of the stones of Nan Madol is yet undetermined. None of the proposed quarry sites exist in Madolenihmw, meaning that the stones must have been transported to their current location. It has been suggested that they might have been floated via raft from the quarry, and a short dive between the island and the quarries shows a trail of dropped stones. However, no one has successfully demonstrated or explained the process. Some modern Pohnpeians believe the stones were flown to the island by use of black magic.

Emphasis mine. Basically, there's this "city" built in the water there and nobody knows how or why. I find it fascinating. Every time I look at that area of the map now, I'll be thinking of weird stones. And who knows, maybe the black magic is why your recent invasion of the place failed.

Do a Google image search, the aerial photos are pretty neat.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by JocMeister »

Cool! [&o]
Image
jcjordan
Posts: 1900
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 8:00 am

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by jcjordan »

What size port/airbase woudl that make it? [:'(]

It's amazing how much "civilization" is buried under the jungles of SAmerica & the Pacific Rim areas
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by geofflambert »

Nothing should be surprising about this. This was the location of the first gorn invasion (which ultimately failed). We invited some of the natives to a Thanksgiving dinner. What we failed to realize was that we were to be the main course. [X(]

User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

Maybe they have finally found the fabled "golden monkey" ?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9bXpWxg8k
mike scholl 1
Posts: 1265
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:20 pm

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by mike scholl 1 »

I do get tired of all these "Our ancestors were to backward and stupid to have done this" theories. Lost Continents and Space Aliens and all this other drivel. My own theory is the "First Practical Joke" notion. Like several thousand years ago, a bunch of guys were sitting around one afternoon in Britany and one of them said, "You know..., if we stood a bunch of these big rocks up in long ordered rows, in 10,000 moons folks will go absolutely crazy trying to find out why we did it!"
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by obvert »

Very cool place. It always amazes me when something is given all kinds of different fantastic origin stories, and yet we have so many examples of amazing structures and cities built much earlier by other groups with the same level of primitive tools and hoist and pulley systems. Stonehenge, the Pyramids of the Americas and of Egypt, Ziggurats, Machu Pichu. Big stones? No problem.

Pacific cultures were some of the most advanced in the world during this period if you take into account their navigational understanding as well as their constructions, such as Easter Island statues.

No Gorns needed. [;)]
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Lokasenna »

What's really mind-boggling about how it could have been made is that some of the stones weigh 50 tons. Scientists have tried to replicate that but the rocks kept sinking the rafts, because you know - 50 tons is a lot.

They had to have done it somehow, though.
Itdepends
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:59 am

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Itdepends »

Sea turtles, mate
Schanilec
Posts: 4038
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Schanilec »

Swallows.
This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.
User avatar
Feltan
Posts: 1173
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:47 am
Location: Kansas

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Feltan »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

What's really mind-boggling about how it could have been made is that some of the stones weigh 50 tons. Scientists have tried to replicate that but the rocks kept sinking the rafts, because you know - 50 tons is a lot.

They had to have done it somehow, though.


xAKL's

Regards,
Feltan
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Ever read the short stort "Killdozer?" Made into a movie in the sixties I think. Ooooohhhh.....
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: Schanilec

Swallows.

African swallows, maybe?
Schanilec
Posts: 4038
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Schanilec »

European?
This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.
User avatar
1EyedJacks
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:26 am
Location: Reno, NV

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by 1EyedJacks »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

What's really mind-boggling about how it could have been made is that some of the stones weigh 50 tons. Scientists have tried to replicate that but the rocks kept sinking the rafts, because you know - 50 tons is a lot.

They had to have done it somehow, though.

Bladders of air tied to a harness. They got the idea from seeing fish bladders.
TTFN,

Mike
User avatar
Symon
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:59 pm
Location: De Eye-lands, Mon

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Symon »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
What's really mind-boggling about how it could have been made is that some of the stones weigh 50 tons. Scientists have tried to replicate that but the rocks kept sinking the rafts, because you know - 50 tons is a lot.

They had to have done it somehow, though.
50 tons of granite is about 602 cubic feet (8.44’ x 8.44’ x 8.44’, mighty big block); limestone's a skoosh less dense, basalt's a skoosh more. If ya dangle it ‘under’ a raft, it displaces 19 tons of water, so it only ‘weighs’ 31 tons. Still a bunch, but a lot less than 50. Archimedes did the hydrostatic math in ~250 BCE. Maybe the scientists should have consulted some sailors.[:D][:D]

The Britons were moving the 50 ton sarsen stones overland from Marlborough Downs to Salisbury in ~1700 BCE. [;)]

[ed] just ran the numbers for breaking strength of natural fiber rope (abaca fibers, i.e., manila hemp). A 1" rope has a 4 ton breaking strength. You would only need 8-10 loops to secure a 31 ton object.
Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: Symon
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
What's really mind-boggling about how it could have been made is that some of the stones weigh 50 tons. Scientists have tried to replicate that but the rocks kept sinking the rafts, because you know - 50 tons is a lot.

They had to have done it somehow, though.
50 tons of granite is about 602 cubic feet (8.44’ x 8.44’ x 8.44’, mighty big block); limestone's a skoosh less dense, basalt's a skoosh more. If ya dangle it ‘under’ a raft, it displaces 19 tons of water, so it only ‘weighs’ 31 tons. Still a bunch, but a lot less than 50. Archimedes did the hydrostatic math in ~250 BCE. Maybe the scientists should have consulted some sailors.[:D][:D]

The Britons were moving the 50 ton sarsen stones overland from Marlborough Downs to Salisbury in ~1700 BCE. [;)]

[ed] just ran the numbers for breaking strength of natural fiber rope (abaca fibers, i.e., manila hemp). A 1" rope has a 4 ton breaking strength. You would only need 8-10 loops to secure a 31 ton object.

I hadn't thought of doing them underwater. That's ingenious and seems obvious after the fact. They really wouldn't have needed to do the math, if they were OK with trial and error...

50 tons over land is a lot different than over water. Didn't the megalithic Brits use logs and roll them, basically? Or am I remember some other ancient stone construction?
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5457
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: OT: Mystery on Ponape

Post by Yaab »

So, if you park a US sub in the Ponape hex, than damage to the sub's hull is a given.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”