Beaufighters are STILL LEVELBOMBERS!!!!

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

Possum
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia

Beaufighters are STILL LEVELBOMBERS!!!!

Post by Possum »

And they are still armed with torpedoes!!!!!
As of Version 2.0
I thought that sufficent documentation had been provided that showed that someone at matrix had stuffed up by making these FIGHTERBOMBERS into torpedo carrying level bombers!!!!
Also not fixed are
2) Lack of Spitfire replacements, making these RAAF squadrons useless in short order. (Reminder, Spitfires were being built in Australia by 1943.)
3) Many historically used bases in New Guinia and Australian are missing.
4)Coral reefs still in the wrong locations.
5) Bathhurst class MSW missing their 20mm AA weapons.
6) RAN and RNZN cruisers still missing their float planes, in fact the CA's still don't even have the capacity to carry a floatplane!

Please MATRIX, at least fix the Beaufighter, and the lack of Spitfire replacements, and the Lack of Aircraft capacity on the Australian CA's.
These should be a simple, easilly implimented changes.

If you had provided a decent editor, I'd go through the scenarioes and fix these ahistorical errors myself...
:mad:
"We're having a war, and we want you to come!"
So the pig began to whistle and to pound on a drum.
"We'll give you a gun, and we'll give you a hat!"
And the pig began to whistle when they told the piggies that.
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Post by Raverdave »

I'll second the motion!
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
tanjman
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Griffin, GA

Beaufighter et al

Post by tanjman »

Possum,

I agree with you on this. I just have a point to bring up about the Beaufighter upgrade path. Currently both the Huson and Beaufort upgrade to the Beaufighter. If the Beaufighter gets changed to a fighter bomber then only those squadrons which historicaly upgraded to the Beaufighter should.

No. 6 Sqn RAAF from what I've been able to determine used the Hudson through out 1942-43.

No. 7 Sqn RAAF from what I've been able to determine used the Beaufort through out 1942-43.

No. 8 Sqn RAAF from what I've been able to determine used the Beaufort through out 1942-43.

No. 66 Sqn RAAF "Equipped with Avro Ansons, 66 Squadron formed at Bundaberg Queensland in May 1943. The squadron conducted anti-submarine patrols and convoy escort missions off Australia's east coast for the remainder of the year.
Although its operations were for the most part uneventful, 66 Squadron did achieve over 1000 operational flying hours before its disbandment in January 1944." In UV this squadron is equipped with Beauforts. Since Avro Ansons are not availble should be changed to the Hudson.

No. 100 Sqn RAAF from what I've been able to determine used the Beaufort through out 1942-43.

So that leaves us with one Beaufighter squadron, No. 30 Sqn RAAF, that is in the UV OOB.

Missing Beaufighter squadrons are:

No. 31 Sqn RAAF, served in the Northern Territory.
No. 92 Sqn RAAF, formed at Kingaroy Queensland in May 1945.
No. 93 Sqn RAAF, formed at Kingaroy Queensland in January 1945.

The other two RAAF Beaufighter squadrons served in Europe.

This is alot of work for Matrix/2by3 for 16 operational aircraft. If its not done for UV it should be for WitP.

I can't find the link were I obtained this info but I'm attaching the text document.

The lack of Spitfire replacements is a major item. The other RAN OOB changes should be made also.

As far as the missing bases go, any of them south of Cairns will need to be in the 'Malaria Free Zone' and have automatic supply from Brisbane. Something that us players can't do with the editor as I found out after making a test scenario with your list of missing bases.
Attachments
raaf.zip
(35.69 KiB) Downloaded 28 times
Gunner's Mate: A Boatswain's Mate with a hunting license.
User avatar
tanjman
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Griffin, GA

RAN & RNZN Ships

Post by tanjman »

Does any one know where the 5 Queensborough class destroyers served? My source (Jane's Fighting Ships of WWII) shows them all being commissioned by Nov 42.

Does any one know of a site like the Hyperwar: USN Ships, 1940-45 site for the RAN & RNZN?
Gunner's Mate: A Boatswain's Mate with a hunting license.
User avatar
David Heath
Posts: 2529
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 5:00 pm

Post by David Heath »

Hi Guys

I took your data to Rich Dionne how is incharge of all the data in the scenarios. When I talked with him about it he did not agree with the findings. Now before anyone gets their underwear twisted in a knot, lets ask Rich. Rich is away on business for this week so do not expect an answer on this until early next week. I send Rich and email with this thread so he can find it.

David
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

ANZAC Ships

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Tut tut...:)

Does everyone remember the problems Rich had regarding missing weapons and ammo fields when we first started changing the ship data? This had a lot to do with differentiating between individual ships within a class (ie Benhams were screwed up because there was an Atlantic "Neutrality Patrol" refit version and an off the stocks Pacific Fleet version. We ended up going with the original to alleviate the problem). As such, differentiating between Canberra's spec's and Australia's, for example, is risky (Australia was more mission capable than Canberra prior to Canberra's loss through refits after battle damage repairs). So, one has to go with a "standard" configuration for a class at this point. Australia class is modelled after a late 1942 refit to Australia and same goes for Hobart (Apollo/Leander class), as both were surviving members of their respective classes. These refits included the removal of their aircraft handling capabilities, and seeing as UV did not give them any (or aircraft squadrons) anyway, so much the easier.

The aircraft on board the ANZAC cruisers were of extremely limited value operationally, to boot. Here is a quote from Vice Admiral William Ward Smith, USN, who commanded the USN contingent of joint TF 44, which operated in the Coral Sea in early 1942.
"I knew that the Australia, like all British men-of-war, was ill equipped for plane operations, primarily because the British Navy had no aviation of its own. On the first morning, she launched her sole aircraft along with ours. As our cruisers recovered the planes after the search, steaming at ten knots, towing alongside a sled resembling a cargo net and whipping the planes on board as they caught their hooks in the netting. Australia, however, stopped dead in the water for more than half an hour. Since we were in submarine infested waters, we were horrified! However, our consternation was even greater when Australia finally succeeded in grappling the plane for hoisting in, and the aircraft simply fell apart. From then on, USN planes did all the searching."
:)

As for the Bathurst class MSW's, maybe they can be adjusted at a later date. I did not think that a few 20mm was worth Rich's (a very busy dude) time so I did not send him the mods.

Cheers, Ron. :)
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

Post by Nikademus »

Originally posted by David Heath
Hi Guys

I took your data to Rich Dionne how is incharge of all the data in the scenarios. When I talked with him about it he did not agree with the findings. Now before anyone gets their underwear twisted in a knot, lets ask Rich. Rich is away on business for this week so do not expect an answer on this until early next week. I send Rich and email with this thread so he can find it.

David
Fire in the sky also claims that Beaufighters in New Gunieau were used as straffers and light attack bombers because of their attributes, which were mainly great speed at low altitudes, impressive firepower forward but marginal maneuverability and decreased preformance at higher altitudes. If used as fighters at higher altitudes they would be very likely to get the sky cut out from under them or at least, have been less effective vs what their claimed role was. Thus their true calling in the Pacific seemed to be similar to the A20.

No mention of carrying torps though. Admitedly i wasn't gonna look a gift horse in the mouth either when they arrived ;)
User avatar
tanjman
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Griffin, GA

Beaufighter & Torpedoes

Post by tanjman »

How about replacing the 18in Mk XII Torpedo with 8 x 90lb rocket projectiles? Which is what they were armed with along with up to 2000lbs of bombs.

http://users.chariot.net.au/~theburfs/beauMAIN.html

Is a site that has RAAF Beaufighter specs.
Gunner's Mate: A Boatswain's Mate with a hunting license.
Wilhammer
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Out in the Sticks of Rockingham County, North Caro
Contact:

Fire in the Sky

Post by Wilhammer »

I just did finish this fine book.

Has Rich read it?

The BFs are strafers and bombers, and no mention was made of torp attacks with them.


They really should be fighter bombers.

Of course, one can argue that Dauntlesses should be fighter bombers with divebombing capability.

First team at Guadalacanal gets into the details of that usage, as does Frank's Gudalcanal. They were used as CAP, especially against torpedo bombers and search planes, and even fighters!

The guy that nailed Sakai was apparently the rear gunner of an SBD who had some experience in the matter. They often counted on enemy pilots mistaking them for Wildcats, and then blasting them with rear guns in a sort of ambush.

It is worth noting that one of the great leaders of the IJN AF was eliminated from the campaign on day one.
Wilhammer
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Out in the Sticks of Rockingham County, North Caro
Contact:

Post by Wilhammer »

The solution might be in WiTP to have a more generic way of assigining air missions to planes.

1. BFs were anti-naval fighter bombers and ground fighter bombers, neither purely fighter or purely bomber, and rarely carrying torpedoes.

2. Dauntlesses used as CAP.

As the war progresses, this will become something of a problem.

Both sides investigated and looked to deploy figheters as torpedoe bomber carriers, the F7F Tiger cat was designed with the ability to carry torps.

The medium and light bombers, especially the A-20s and B-25/26 are bombers by design, but took on fighter bomber roles (low level attack combined with strafing).

Fighters were never considered bombers before the war, but they became that.

AMOF, all fighters in UV should be fighter bombers, if only to strafe. AMOF, it was Japanese doctrine to use fighters (the Zero) to strafe warships during anti-naval atacks to supress AAA and command.

P-40s, at this time, were used for ground strikes.

BTW, it is wierd to have B-17s and B-24s at 100 feet STRAFING targets.

A question to the designers; does a strafing bomber contribute ALL of its MG/Cannon armament to a strafe attack or does it just consider the forward guns?
User avatar
Mike Wood
Posts: 1424
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Oakland, California
Contact:

Post by Mike Wood »

Hello...

When strafing, bombers only use the forward firing guns. When in air-to-air combat, they only use the guns facing the enemy fighters (who can attack from various directions and angles).

Bye...

Michael Wood
Lead Programmer,
Matrix Games
___________________________________________________
Originally posted by Wilhammer
A question to the designers; does a strafing bomber contribute ALL of its MG/Cannon armament to a strafe attack or does it just consider the forward guns?
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Re: RAN & RNZN Ships

Post by Raverdave »

Originally posted by tanjman
Does any one know where the 5 Queensborough class destroyers served? My source (Jane's Fighting Ships of WWII) shows them all being commissioned by Nov 42.

Does any one know of a site like the Hyperwar: USN Ships, 1940-45 site for the RAN & RNZN?
Queensborough Class? These ships, were known in the RAN as "Q" ships. Of the eight that were produced, only two served in the RAN during WW2, these being the HMAS Quiberon and HMAS Quickmatch, both being commissioned in 1942. In 1945, between october and November another three ships of this class were transfered to the RAN HMAS Quadrant, HMAS Quality and HMAS Queenborough.
A quick search shows that HMAS Quiberon is credited with sinking U411 in 1942.......that puts her in either the Med or the convoy runs to the US (just quessing here guys).

Ahhh...............I just found the following:-

HMAS QUIBERON

Technical Details

Type: Anti-Submarine Frigate (ex-Destroyer)

Displacement: 1705 tons (standard) (as Destroyer) 2020 tons (standard) (as Frigate)

Length: 358 feet 9 inches
Beam: 35 feet 9 inches

Draught: 9 feet 6 inches
Complement: 220
Propulsion: Parsons geared turbines, 2 shafts, 40,000 SHP
Laid Down: 14 October 1940
Launched: 31 January 1942 Mrs Tillard, wife of Rear Admiral S.D. Tillard, Flag Officer in Charge, Southampton
Armament (Main):
As Destroyer
4x4.7 inch guns
4x2 pounder guns
2x40 mm guns
8x21 inch torpedo tubes

As Frigate
2x4 inch guns (twin-mount)
2x40 mm Bofors AA
2 triple-barrel depth charge mortars
Builders: J. Samuel White & Co. Ltd, Cowes, Isle of Wight, UK
Commissioned: 6 July 1942 (as Destroyer)
18 December 1957 (as Frigate)
Speed: 31 knots

Following commissioning at Cowes, Isle of Wight, QUIBERON manned by an Australian crew proceeded to Scapa Flow. Until late August 1942 she was engaged in working up exercises in northern Scottish waters and was then detailed to North Atlantic convoy escort duty. One of her first tasks was to form part of the escort of a twenty-one ship troop convoy bound for Capetown but was detached from this duty to search for a suspected U-Boat supply ship in the Atlantic. After a fruitless cruise over a wide area QUIBERON reached Freetown (Africa) on 27 September, proceeded thence to Gibraltar and back to British home waters having steamed 12,000 miles and spent only three out of forty-two days in harbour.

In October 1942 she formed a unit of the large British naval forces assigned to support the Allied landings in North Africa (Operation 'Torch'). During this period of her service which took her into the Mediterranean for the first time QUIBERON experienced her first contact with the enemy when she became the frequent target of aircraft. On 28 November 1942 while operating off the Tunisian coast north west of Bone in company of HMS QUENTIN she attacked and destroyed the Italian submarine DESSIE.

On 1 December 1942 QUIBERON formed a unit of a force of three cruisers and three destroyers despatched from Bone (Tunisia) to intercept an enemy convoy reported bound from Sicily to Tunis. Contact was made in the early hours of 2 December and all four ships of the convoy and the escorting Italian destroyer LUPO were sunk, but HMS QUENTIN (QUIBERON's sister ship) was sunk by an aircraft torpedo on the way back to Bone and at dawn QUIBERON, while under heavy air attack, was called upon to rescue her complement.

QUIBERON operated in North African waters on convoy and fleet escort duties for the remainder of December 1942 and throughout January 1943. On 21 December, she took off survivors from the burning liner STRATHALLAN which had been torpedoed off the Algerian coast by a U-Boat.

At the end of January 1943, QUIBERON left the Mediterranean as a unit of the escort of a convoy bound from England to Capetown. She arrived at Durban on 27 February and from there proceeded to Australia arriving Fremantle on 29 March, having steamed 51,000 miles on war service.

After refitting at Melbourne, she returned to the Indian Ocean and at Kilindini (Kenya) in June 1943 joined the British Eastern Fleet. She spent the remainder of 1943 almost constantly at sea escorting Indian Ocean convoys.

In 1944, QUIBERON continued serving as an escort destroyer of the Eastern Fleet protecting convoys proceeding mainly between India and Aden. In March 1944, British Indian Ocean naval forces were reinforced, and were able to take the offensive against Japanese held territory. QUIBERON took part in the carrier air strikes against Sabang (April 1944) and Sourabaya (May 1944) before returning to Australia for another refit at Melbourne.

QUIBERON rejoined the Eastern Fleet at Trincomalee (Ceylon) on 1 August 1944 and resumed escort duty in the Indian Ocean. In October 1944 as a unit of the Fleet, she took part in a series of bombardments of the Japanese held Nicobar Islands. In mid December she detached from the Eastern Fleet and returned to Australia where for the next few weeks she operated as an escort and anti-submarine vessel on the Australia Station.

In March 1945 QUIBERON proceeded to Manus, the United States base in the Admiralty Islands, as a unit of the British Pacific Fleet. From Manus she proceeded north to the operational area and was thereafter until the end of hostilities actively engaged in the closing phases of the war at sea against Japan. She took part in operations in support of the American seizure of Okinawa and subsequent attacks on the Japanese homeland. When the war ended in August, she had steamed 236,000 miles of war service.

Peace did not bring immediate respite for QUIBERON. She was present at the re-occupation of Shanghai, and then served in the East Indies until February 1946, troop carrying, retrieving prisoners of war and assisting in the re-establishment of Dutch control in the area.

In March 1946, following a short refit at Sydney, she sailed for Japan to begin the first of three periods of occupation duty. She reached Sydney at the end of her third period of Far East service (March - July 1948) on 22 July 1948 and was there immobilised having steamed 80,000 miles in the post war years and a total of 316,772 miles since commissioning. In six years of seagoing service QUIBERON had been under way 20,452 hours 52 minutes or almost two and a half years. She paid off on 15 May 1950.

In November 1950 the task of converting QUIBERON to a modern anti-submarine frigate was commenced at Cockatoo Dockyard, Sydney. Later the ship was transferred to the Naval Dockyard at Garden Island, Sydney, where the conversion was completed in December 1957. She recommissioned on 18 December 1957.

QUIBERON during her six and a half years commission (December 1957 - June 1964) spent several periods of duty on Far East service as a unit of the British Strategic Reserve based on Singapore and from time to time operated as a unit of the South East Asia Treaty Organisation forces on periodical exercises in Far East waters. Otherwise she operated as a unit of the Australian Fleet (1st Frigate Squadron) on the Australia Station. Her service career ended when she paid off to Reserve on 26 June 1964.

On 15 February 1972 QUIBERON was sold for breaking up to Fujita Salvage Company Limited of Osaka, Japan, for $68,260.00.

On 10 April 1972 the Japanese tug SUMI MARU No 38 left Sydney for Japan with QUIBERON and another former RAN vessel, TOBRUK, in tow.

HMAS QUICKMATCH

Technical Details

Type: Anti-Submarine Frigate (ex-Destroyer)

Displacement: 1705 tons (standard) (as Destroyer) 2020 tons (standard) (as Frigate)

Length: 358 feet 9 inches
Beam: 35 feet 9 inches

Draught: 9 feet 6 inches
Propusion: Parsons geared turbines, 2 shafts, 40,000 SHP
Laid Down: 6 February, 1941
Launched: 11 April, 1942 (Mrs Shearman)
Armament: As Destroyer
4x4 .7 inch guns
4x2 pounder guns
8x21 inch torpedo tubes

As Frigate
2x4 inch guns (twin-mount)
2x40 mm Bofors AA
2 triple-barrel depth charge mortars
Builders: J. Samuel White & Co Ltd. Cowes, Isle of Wight, UK
Complement: 220
Speed: 31 knots

HMAS QUICKMATCH commissioned at Cowes, Isle of Wight on 14 September, 1942 under the command of Lieutenant-Commander Rodney Rhodes, DSC, RAN.

After trials the ship commenced convoy escort duty on 5 October, 1942.

In November, 1942 she proceeded to the South Atlantic station for further convoy escort duty. En route on 1 December, she intercepted the Italian blockade runner CORTELAZZO. Following four months convoy duty on the South Atlantic station QUICKMATCH transferred to the Indian Ocean for similar duty, although she was detached to the South Atlantic station during June, July and August, 1943.

In May, 1944 QUICKMATCH was included in the main force of the British Eastern Fleet based on Ceylon which carried out a successful carrier borne air attack on the Japanese base at Sourabaya on 17 May. This action was followed on 21 June by a similar assault from the air on Port Blair in the Andaman Islands. In these operations QUICKMATCH was a unit of the 4th Destroyer Flotilla, Eastern Fleet. On 25 July 1944 QUICKMATCH,
as part of an inshore force, entered Sabang Harbour (Sumatra) and carried out a close-range bombardment
of Japanese installations.

In October, 1944 QUICKMATCH arrived in Australian waters for the first time. After visiting Espiritu Santo (New Hebrides) she commenced her annual refit at Sydney (November-December 1944). Following the refit QUICKMATCH served mainly in Australian waters, with a visit to New Zealand, until March, 1945. She then proceeded to the Far East as a unit of the British Pacific Fleet as one of the ships screening the Royal Navy carriers whose task it was to neutralise Japanese air fields in support of the United States invasion in Okinawa ('Operation Iceberg'). In July, again screening carriers of the British Pacific Fleet, she took part in further assaults on the Japanese home islands. When hostilities ceased on 15 August, 1945 QUICKMATCH was en route to Manus (Admiralty Islands) after operating in support of attacks on the main Japanese island of Honshu. She had steamed some 224,000 miles on war service.

In the early post-war years QUICKMATCH remained in sea-going service on the Australian station interspersed with several tours of duty in Japanese and Korean waters. In July, 1948 she returned to Sydney following three months as Australian Squadron representative in Japan and was placed in immobilised commission. She paid off on 15 May, 1950.

On 28 March 1951 QUICKMATCH was towed by the tug HMAS RESERVE to Williamstown Naval Dockyard (Vic) where the work of converting her to a modern anti-submarine frigate was commenced. Conversion was completed in 1955 and she re-commissioned on 23 September, 1955 under
the command of Lieutenant Commander Duncan H. Stevens, RAN. She had five tours of duty in Far East waters totalling almost two years of foreign service as a unit of the Commonwealth strategic Reserve and including several periods exercising with the forces of the South East Asia Treaty Organisation. The remainder of her last commission was spent on the Australia station, and in South West Pacific and New Zealand waters.

When QUICKMATCH paid off to Reserve at Williamstown on 26 April, 1963 she had steamed 246,822 miles. After paying off she served as an Accommodation Ship at Williamstown.

On 15 February, 1972 QUICKMATCH was sold for scrap to Fujita Salvage Company Limited of Osaka, Japan. On 6 July, 1972 the Japanese tug SUMI MARU left Melbourne for Japan with QUICKMATCH and another former RAN vessel, GASCOYNE, in tow.

For more info on RAN ships during WW2 goto the following site:-

http://www.navy.gov.au/history/navalhistory.htm


:)
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Drongo
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Melb. Oztralia

Post by Drongo »

Posted by Raverdave
For more info on RAN ships during WW2 goto the following site:-


Do you mean, what you posted wasn't everything on the site???:p
Have no fear,
drink more beer.
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Post by Raverdave »

Originally posted by Drongo
Posted by Raverdave


Do you mean, what you posted wasn't everything on the site???:p

And it is comments like the above which go to show why you will always be a mere "Matrix Vet" while I shall continue onto greater things, past that of my current "Matrix Hero":p
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
tanjman
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Griffin, GA

RAN WWII Site

Post by tanjman »

Dave,

Thanks for the info and the link.

Have you been beating up on Drongo via PBEM again? ;)

BTW are there any books concerning ANZAC OOBs and WWII you (or anyone else for that matter) could recommend?
Gunner's Mate: A Boatswain's Mate with a hunting license.
angus
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 4:05 am
Location: Brussels

Re: RAN WWII Site

Post by angus »

Originally posted by tanjman
Dave,

Thanks for the info and the link.

Have you been beating up on Drongo via PBEM again? ;)

BTW are there any books concerning ANZAC OOBs and WWII you (or anyone else for that matter) could recommend?
It only covers the situation at the start of the WitP but Leo Niehorster's website is worth a look, it's here :-

http://www.freeport-tech.com/WWII/

There's a really great series of articles on the first AIF in WW1 on the web but nothing that good for WW2. The WW1 stuff is here :-

http://www.unsw.adfa.edu.au/~rmallett/

Peter Dunn's Australia@War page has a fair bit on Oz in WW2. Well worth a dekko :-

http://home.st.net.au/~dunn/

That's all I can think off at the moment.

Cheers,

Angus
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 10:00 am
Location: UK

More Beaufighter info

Post by Iron Duke »

The RAAF recieved 218 beaufighters from Britain

57 Mk.Ic's strike fighter/long range escort
64 Mk.VIc's Maritime strike fighter
62 TF Mk. X's Maritime strike fighter and Torpedo bomber (this is the variant that is refered to as the 'Torbeau')
20 Mk.XIc's Maritime strike fighter

The Australians also produced 364 beaufighters at the Fishermen's Bend plant.
Mk.20 (for RNZAF )
Mk.21

Out of the above Beaufighters only the 62 TF Mk.X were Torpedo bombers all the other variants did not have a torpedo carrying capacity

Note . Some(about 60) Mk.VIc's were modified to carry torpedoes , these were designated as Mk.VIc (ITF) 'INTERIM TORPEDO FIGHTERS' and as far as I can tell these operated in the ETO only.

The squadrons operating the beaufighters were :-
30 Sqdn formed June 42 with Mk.Ic's
31 Sqdn formed Aug 42 with Mk.Ic's
22 Sqdn formed late 44 with Mk.21's
93 Sqdn formed Jan 42 not operational until jun 45
92 Sqdn not operational


Any comments
"Bombers outpacing fighters - you've got to bloody well laugh!" Australian Buffalo pilot - Singapore
User avatar
tanjman
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Griffin, GA

Post by tanjman »

Angus,

Thanks for the links the first one I had, the third looks like it will help alot for scenario design, the second one looks interesting but more for my general interest in WWI.

Thanks again.

Iron Duke,

Did the RNZAF operate the Beaufighter in the PTO? If so do you know which squadrons?

BTW from the info I could find I do not think the Beaufort squadrons (Nos. 7, 8, 66 & 100 Sqn RAAF) or the Hudson squadrons (Nos. 6 & 32 Sqn RAAF) in UV should upgrade to the Beaufighter since only No. 30 Sqn RAAF operated in the SWPac during this time period. That and replacing the the torpedo with rocket projectiles should fix the discrepancies. I hesitate asking Martix/2by3 to make it a fighter bomber because I don't think the Beaufighter was used as a CAP fighter, and I would hate to see the AI do so.
Gunner's Mate: A Boatswain's Mate with a hunting license.
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

Post by Reg »

Nice research Iron Duke, right on the money.

The Beaufighter may have replaced the Beaufort on the production lines (which was Fisherman's Bend - Melbourne for the odd serial numbers and Mascot - Sydney for the even numbers) but they certainly did not replace them in the squadrons. Four of the five Beaufighter squadrons only ever operated the Beaufighter aircraft. No. 22 Squadron had always operated alongside the Beaufighter squadrons but only converted to the type after their A-20 Bostons were all destroyed in a Japanese air raid in late '44 and there were no replacements.

I brought this upgrade anomaly up with Rich months ago but I'm sure things aren't that easy to change.

On a very minor issue, A8-1 to A8-365 were all completed as Beaufighter Mk21 aircraft (A8-172 was damaged during a pre-delivery test flight and never repaired). None went to NZ or were intended to as far as I can see in my readings.

The Beaufighter was definitely a strike aircraft using guns/rockets and standard practice when encountering Japanese fighters was to dive to low level and simply out distance the pursuers ("Down low, nothing could touch a Beaufighter at that stage of the war"). However when cornered, the Beaufighter was still quite capable of inflicting losses on the attacking fighters as recorded by unit histories.

Cheers,
Reg.
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 10:00 am
Location: UK

Beaufighters and aircraft upgrades

Post by Iron Duke »

Tanjman , Reg

As far as I can tell the RNZAF did not operate the Beafighter but in a couple of books there have been references to the Mk.XX going to them , by including that info in the post I was hoping somebody may have additional info.

I hope Matrix/2by3 change the beaufigter from a torpedo bomber . I think it should be a fighter/bomber , if anybody uses it for cap they will only have themselves to blame for heavy losses, but at least we will be able to use it in its correct role .

Aircraft upgades are handled far to simply in UV , and will be in WitP also.
i.e RAAF Hudson sqdn's upgraded to Beauforts and PV-1 Ventura's not Beaufighters. But i'm not sure how they can manage an auto-upgrade to two different a/c. Unless they hard code sqdn a/c upgrades( which I think would be a bad idea).

Another a/c that will have problems with upgrade path will be the
Hurricane . In India/Burma not all Hurricane sqdn's upgraded to the spitfire about 9 sqdns upgraded to Thunderbolt Mk.I and Mk.II's
Cheers
"Bombers outpacing fighters - you've got to bloody well laugh!" Australian Buffalo pilot - Singapore
Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”