Mk48 torpedo vs tanker

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
Tycho
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 1:50 am

Mk48 torpedo vs tanker

Post by Tycho »

Disclaimer, I know little to nothing about modern weapons (lots about WW2 stuff...) so part of the fun is just digging through the DB.

One of the easy-rated scenarios from the Steam Workshop (688 Attack Sub 4, Mumar Cadaver 1989) has a US sub attacking a (poorly defended) tanker convoy. With the weapons at hand (there are a couple Tomahawks, not enough to make much difference) it looks like I need 13 torpedoes (3440 damage on the tanker vs 270/hit) to sink a tanker. Is that correct? In the scenario 4-5 hits will make one dead in the water but you only get VPs for sunk ships (and the VC imply you should get 3-4 of them). I'm confused...
Thanks,
Tycho
thewood1
Posts: 10089
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: Mk48 torpedo vs tanker

Post by thewood1 »

This was discussed just a month ago. There are a number of accounts in the Gulf of large container ships and super tankers taking big hits and just steaming through it.
thewood1
Posts: 10089
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: Mk48 torpedo vs tanker

Post by thewood1 »

Tycho
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 1:50 am

RE: Mk48 torpedo vs tanker

Post by Tycho »

Thank you for the link! That's really interesting. I knew tankers were big, just not *that* big.
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”