START OF SOVIET TURN 3
In the air phase, Axis did a lot of bombing missions against our railyards. These did damage the railyards, but I am not sure that really had any particular effect on reducing Soviet supply - a least not yet. None of the bombing raids were intercepted by Soviet fighters.
For example, Velikie Luki was bombed - quite a lot...:
And also the rail hexes next to it were bombed with Railwar Air Interdiction missions:
That one for example apparently increased rail usage by 122. Which is not very much of the 12k-ish capacity of a single line rail (or the 30k-ish of a double line).
Did the bombing of Pskov have a discernible effect? It is hard to tell, but possibly. We did only receive 2578 freight at VL. However, it is hard to ttell how much of that is because we did not have a huge # of units there, so demand for freight was fairly low, and how much was because of the bombing.
Even if the freight to VL were limited, it probably would not much have mattered, because we got 7720 freight (which was not even sent out to units) at the nearby Toropets depot:
The Idritsa depot also sent out nearly 6000 freight to units near Velikie Luki.
Total air losses were 168 Axis (mostly Flak and operational from bombing the railyards), and 278 Soviet (entirely from defensive ground support).
There was also bombing of all the ports in Crimea, which damaged them. It is hard to tell if that had any effect because we did not have the Crimea depots on priority 4 this turn (we wanted them to send their freight to the front at this point in the game).
Overall, our supply seemed to be ok in general:
Now, on to the land!...
Palvov was executed, and replaced by Voroshilov as commander of the Western Front:
In the north, we found out the answer to our question... The Axis commander XRAM did indeed spot the gap to the east of Velikie Luki. And it appears that he drove his Panzergruppe straight through the gap:
One can understand why this was tempting to do, since after all it was totally undefended. On the plus side for the Axis, this means they advanced pretty far, and threatened the flanks of Pskov. But on the negative side, the advance was very narrow, just a few hexes wide, making it comparatively easy to cut off. In addition, it appeared that Germany had broken down partly into regiments as well (that 3=3 Panzer at the base south of Pskov is a regiment, for example), and regiments are very vulnerable to counterattack.
As soon as we began the land phase, we noticed that the entire Panzergruppe could be cut off just by this one single Anti-tank brigade, all by itself:
The AT brigade also only had 24 movement points... AT brigades can have up to 35, so this was only just using a fraction of the AT brigade's true power.
So right from he very start of the turn, IGB knew that he would cut off the entire Panzergruppe. The only question was how much additional damage could be done.
In the center, Panzer_Freak advanced more cautiously with AGC in comparison to AGN, just flipping a few hexes on the land bridge but otherwise resting:
Meanwhile in the south, Intelligent advanced boldly directly to the east, in a style similar to the north - directly forward a long way, but on a very thin and narrow front, vulnerable to counterattack and/or being cut off. The German Panzer and motorized units were also broken down into nice juicy regiments, making them tempting targets:
But as we all know, fracas is a gentle and peaceful player (hence the name, "fracas"), and he would never dream of doing anything like that. However, there was also another question... If fracas were to counterattack, who would be fooling who? Would fracas merely doom his own troops by counterattacking, if he were to do so?
...
Stay tuned to find out in upcoming episodes of For the Infallible Koba
...