Soviet strategy - Turkey and Persia

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers.

Moderators: Joel Billings, JanSorensen

Post Reply
War737
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:18 pm

Soviet strategy - Turkey and Persia

Post by War737 »

If the Soviet player can take Turkey and Northern Persia (as long as he thinks a German drive to the Caucasus is not immminent), is it worth it? Do the few gained resource points help? Thanks.
dembe73
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:13 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: Soviet strategy - Turkey and Persia

Post by dembe73 »

I wouldnt mess with Turkey, too many troops. Northern Persia can be a good idea, especially if the English take the south. You can use it to move supplies over land that way. Its better to have the WA declare war at the south and move in the Russians when they get unfrozen. It costs 10 supply for the WA to declare war, but there is nothing better to do with supply before USA enters the game. SU on the other hand needs every bit of supply they can get their hands on.

hakon
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:55 pm

RE: Soviet strategy - Turkey and Persia

Post by hakon »

Actually, I think Russia should take both north and south Persia, as those resources would otherwise go as free trade to Germany, and Russia is resource short, something the wester allies are not.

An additonal benefit of persia, is that the wester allies can always send supply there, which means that they pay for the repairs (and probably more).
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”