<t> I dont post much, like most of the people who have responded [:D], but I'd like to think that on the occasion that I do post I have something useful to say. Alas, college applications have killed any and all free time I have until january. If the position is still open then I would LOVE to be a ...

*im too slow*

<t> I think that strategy would fail spectacularly with the new maps. If Russia is pushed back, or runs back, to the Urals then the European scale maps would give the german tanks much more room to blitz and kill. Japan might be hurting for a while, but the long term consequences for the allies ...

<t> Agreed, looks great.<br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
However, looking at this on the CWIF scale it seems a little.....unpopulated. Anyone who knows more about the actual number of people living in the Caucasus? Seems to me there should be some more cities on the Caspian and on those rail lines.<br/>
&nbsp ...

<r> Roads and rails are never changed, they are fixed on the map. (one of the few additions WIF needs imho)<br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
Forts may be built as detailed below, and several forts are printed on the map(the maginot line, singapore, etc.)<br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
The wartime economy is controlled by the ...

What we need is DOD incorporated into MWIF, but thats a whole nother bag of problems and I for one will be perfectly satisfied with WIF on its own.

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets<br/>
<br/>
The German air units - about half of them. Fighters first. Screen shot #1 of 4.<br/>
<br/>
What I have done with the names is to make the extension a smaller font, but only if an Also Known Name is given. For example, the Emil's ...

<t> flip x and w? ctrl w is frequently used to close windows, x is not. confusion is best avoided imho.<br/>
<br/>
EDIT-<br/>
also r and y. I find myself looking at the rules often, and Id rather have that be the intuitive keystroke than the relationships between countries which I can usually ...

reading this thread seems to be making me lean towards composer99's way as well.

no offence to all you programmers, without you id have no games to play.

but of course. although ive had better experiences with cyberboard, but im good with anything. email is fuzzybunnyy@gmail.com if you want to email me the info or w.e.

As long as your willing to deal with the time difference, id love to play. I live in California, but lord knows i cant sleep anyways.

gosh, that doesnt look like a very happy russian position. Is it just me or are like 4-5 corps about to die? and why is that 4-2 ART alone? also, why are the russian airfields garrisoned? in the abscence of PARA, Id imagine those units are needed at the front.

how in gods name....did your german player roll like 10 consecutive 1's (2's on 2D10)?? or was he/she just extremly inexperienced?

share the wealth? ive been looking at that scenario and wanting to try it out but cant seem to find the setup anywhere.....

If there is some legal issue going on dont bother, but I figure I can ask...

<t> in a theoretical way this makes sense. but in the last couple of turns of a WIF game, you tend to get this horrid "who can hold the victory cities against all odds" thing going on, especially with the Axis. Ive seen Japan holding nearly every victory city in the Pacific with white print corps ...

<t> this is getting way of topic, and in no way am I saying this should be in WIF, but the victory system needs some work IMHO. Perhaps Control of continous areas in significant region with an exponential growth of VP for more hexes in an area? say that hexes in germany have a base value, and for ...

i have to agree. ive always felt that people can look at a game board for several minutes and just know who won, but victory cities seem rather abstract and well.....pointless. but of course thats very subjective and all.

<t> San Fransisco, 17 years old. been playing WIF for 6 years now. math teacher tried to teach me and some of my friends how to play with the boards, but being as we had no space to keep a game set up and we are all rather on the slow side we ended up running two incomplete games(into 41 and the ...

<t> i dont know much about programming, and im in a hurry, but off the top of my head why not have a designated "leading country" for each side (UK/Germany) that gets to increase the CV value of hexes for its allies? That would let Germany tell both Japan and Italy where to go, and would let the UK ...

how, if at all, will a human player communicate long term strategic goals to the AI? I find that especially when playing the Axis all 3 countries should decide on what to do. If Japan decides to invade Siberia and Germany goes Sea Lion....yada yada, you get it. just wondering.