same problem with me  .
I guess it is another pbem bug ?
partisans units don't appear , exactly the same phenomen than with regular "events reinforcement" ?

<t> Found in file territorial_demands_hungary_romania.xml <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
about the event 8056 :<br/>
<br/>
<!--Option 1 in event 8011--> <br/>
<expression> <br/>
<leftOperand method="Flag.GetValue" param0="8011"/> <br/>
<operator value="equals"/> <br/>
<rightOperand constValue="2"/> <br ...

I had the same trouble with ITALIAN units ONLY . german units were not lost , but italian disapeared and were not in deploy box .
I had to replay and withdraw italian units from france before&nbsp;meeting the&nbsp;vichy conditions .
&nbsp;

it looks like transport ships are now business class ships [:D]

<t> <br/>
playing 1.7 HF by PBEM , we regularly have a game crash at the opening of the PBEM game .<br/>
<br/>
error in consoleout : "Data integrity error: HMS Ceres belongs to fleet id=122, but no such fleet exists" <br/>
<br/>
we solve it by opening fleet.csv, deleting the first blank cell at ...

<t> hey damastabango , S35 counters were not included in&nbsp;PzBlitz, neither in PzLeader , but included in an add-on of "the general" !! [8D]<br/>
for my part , I prefer your first proposition , and with no colour difference between corps and divs [8|]<br/>
well, you are the chief stylist ... do ...

<t> beautifull ( "ho la la , dieu que c'est&nbsp;beau !! "&nbsp;, en francais dans le texte ) <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
can I make 2-3 remarks ?<br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
I would prefer to have the same colors between div and corps and I like the "classic" NATO symbols XX and XXX instead of the complete words ...

PP transfer is only possible by sea convoys ... no possibility to tranfer PP between germany ant italy or irak and great britain ...

oui au boulot , mince [:D]

I want them NOW [:)]

<t> hello , <br/>
I come back once again with the refusal of vichy by france : <br/>
<br/>
If I well interpreted the XML events files , I can understand that :<br/>
<br/>
--> if Vichy is not declared ( because of refusal by germans or by france ) <br/>
--> consequence : tripartite pact ...

As far as I remember , in 1.7 , vichy was asked without having isolated maginot and without the loss of marseille .
but vichy was refused by france . (maybe not possible if I would have done what you mention ?) .

as a british human player, you have to ask for a huge US lend lease to feed your naval repair noria ....

<t> it's not necessary to take strasbourg or isolate maginot line to have vichy event . <br/>
I had vichy event with germans without attacking a single hex of maginot line .<br/>
<br/>
you can't take all the VP cities of france as plenty of them are in lebanon and north africa ... difficult to ...

<t> ok , now I understand !!<br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
I'm playing 2 games : <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
one as allied player in 1.6 --> this possibility doesn't exist [:(]<br/>
one as axis player in 1.7 --> this new feature exists but , no CV in my OOB&nbsp; [>:]&nbsp;&nbsp; <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
a question is ...

hello ,
I don't understand ...
do you mean that you can air attack a port with a CV group ?
I didn't find it in the manual ( which is not surprising , there is nearly nothing interesting in this manual ), and didn't find the way to do in the game ....
&nbsp;

do you control lille, paris, nantes , metz , caen and le havre ?
if not I think vichy will not be declared . and be carefull, france has the option to continue fighting

<t> hello everybody ,<br/>
<br/>
I'm playing my first 2 grand campaign games , and I constantly discover "by surprise" the events when they occur ...<br/>
( for instance, I didn't know that France could refuse Vichy ... it was a very very bad news for Italy to see all the french navy go on ...

ok , it works ...
yes in fact in PBEM there is a lot of this kind of few things that really look not very adequate ..
first of all the very difficult way to see the combats that occured, only through the reports .

<t> From my point of view , TOW is by far my best grand strategy computer wargame .<br/>
It succeeds in inventing new "old good boardgames" rules that seem to be quite historicaly "accurate" and in using computer to simplify all the complexity usually found in traditionals boardgames.&nbsp;<br ...