Any more thoughts on this one? Any changes, corrections, etc. needed? Or is it ready for the Community Scenario Pack?

Thanks!

I suspect the player base for Command MP will expand as more scenarios designed for it become available.

Challenge accepted. :)

Actually, I have a feeling MP will bring in a lot of new players who will start with multiplayer scenarios (because that is how they played other games) and then some ...

I just uploaded version 3.

Biggest changes are...

* I added the base at Zatec (MiG-21s)
* I added a small point bonus for taking down Warsaw Pact aircraft
* I placed several aircraft in "Maintenance" loadout. They are available for players to add if the scenario is too hard, but the baseline is ...

New beta for testing...

It's 1986 and you need to make a surprise attack against the Soviets so they won't be able to make a surprise attack tomorrow. All you have to do is blow up some bridges. Simple, right?

As always, please let me know what you think. Is there anything that needs to be ...

New beta for testing...

It's 1986 and you need to make a surprise attack against the Soviets so they won't be able to make a surprise attack tomorrow. All you have to do is blow up some bridges. Simple, right?

As always, please let me know what you think. Is there anything that needs to be ...

New beta for testing...

It's 1986 and you need to make a surprise attack against the Soviets so they won't be able to make a surprise attack tomorrow. All you have to do is blow up some bridges. Simple, right?

As always, please let me know what you think. Is there anything that needs to be ...

With multiplayer for Command now in beta, I suppose we have to start thinking about how that affects scenario design. I suspect most scenarios written for Command so far are actually ill-suited for multiplayer. The sides are probably not balanced and the scenarios themselves may simply be too long ...

Thanks for the very detailed feedback. I appreciate it. I think I got the errors you and Blast33 spotted.

Just posted version 2.

I deliberately didn't award points for Warsaw Pact aircraft because they are not considered important--what matters is that you take out the bridges, the radars, the ...

Anyone else tried this one out yet? I think it's in pretty good shape, but I'm hoping to get more feedback about what its strengths and weaknesses are, what could be improved, etc.

Thanks in advance!

The bridges actually are auto-detect (I think all non-mobile facilities are). But there is a lot of clutter with the various neutral buildings surrounding the bridges so you need to zoom in to find them. But they should just be there.

Good call about air defense. I will do a bit of research and ...

New beta for testing...

It's 1986 and you need to make a surprise attack against the Soviets so they won't be able to make a surprise attack tomorrow. All you have to do is blow up some bridges. Simple, right?

As always, please let me know what you think. Is there anything that needs to be ...

Thanks, I hope the list is expanded :)


I suspect it will partly depend on people looking up what actual submarines were known to be able to carry and sending in requests to Pygmallion.

I would argue that ANY regular-sized submarine should be able to carry a few extra people (e.g., a team of ...

If it doesn't have it already try selecting the unit and opening the boating operations window. Looks like you can add them in the same way you can add aircraft facilities.


You can do this, but I found it to be a little tricky (unless I'm missing something)...

You add a submarine. Then you add ...

Looks like someone copied it over to the Tech Issues sub-forum. Thanks to whoever did that!

The slider works. The problem is that the base icons seem to be out of scale with each other. Sea and air icons are normal, but ground units and facilities are tiny. I can adjust the ground icons, but if I simply use the Icon Zoom slider, the ships and aircraft end up being huge when the facilities ...

Yes, I found those controls. The problem is that the ground unit icons seem to be out of scale with the aircraft and sea vessel icons. They all slide up and down with icon zoom, but the ground unit ones are tiny, and getting to them the right size makes the ships and aircraft icons very large. This ...

Just downloaded build 1868 and installed it. I've noticed ground facility icons seem to be very small, compared to ship and aircraft icons. Is this something I can adjust in the game, a bug, or simply the way the facility/ground unit icons now appear? If I use the icon zoom control in the Game menu ...

Sea of Japan Crisis - Convoy to Taoyuan, 1985 [final version]

Found this online while I was gathering information for some database requests. It appears to be a global handbook of drones, basically explaining who has what, some technical details for the drones, etc. It may be useful to some people.

https://dronecenter.bard.edu/files/2019/10/CSD-Drone-Databook ...

Any additional thoughts on this one or is it ready for the Community Scenario Pack?

Thanks.