The other feature worth noting is the ability to quickly assign new routes from an existing waypoint.

If you are moving a unit into an known with known enemy you can quickly issue a MARCH route and then have it switch to an ENGAGE route - all with a few clicks.

This is currently possible with FC ...

The Steel Beasts way - this works VERY well and I could see this being a much better solution for rapidly issuing orders in FC

The game attempts to play the all shots fired in an engagement, and filters out some of the redundant shots.

I've only ever noticed two playing and I'm giving totally honest feedback: it doesn't sound good. I would highly recommend just using one shot sound. It sounds as if the the sounds aren't ...

Do note that there is a quick way to adjust the SOP for all movement waypoints together, using right mouse button

Absolutely, but it is still additional clicking when you want to give a movement order. You issue the type of movement (assault, hasty, deliberate), then manipulate SOP. It would be ...

It seems that every time a unit fires its weapon then I hear the sound twice.

I'd recommend just playing the sound once. It sounds odd hearing it twice.

A recommendation to add quick orders for routes and waypoints once you right click on a unit so the player doesn't have to adjust the SOP for every movement.

Is it possible to get a check mark to identify which SOP the unit is using?

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: PipFromSlitherine<br/>
<br/>
Not on release, though we can see what players ask for post-release. Anything beyond 1v1 has progressively smaller player-bases and likelihood of game completion in our experience.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Hey man, 1993 called ...

You should create a mapping tutorial. This is such a wonderful, and realistic looking map.

The UI looks clean and very appealing.

I absolutely love the realistic mapping style. Graphical effects similar to the last Close Combat would be lovely with this style.

<r> <IMG src="http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/31564/DD2F256C7B214303BFC848894F418CF4.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/31564/DD2F256C7B214303BFC848894F418CF4.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="upfiles/31564/DD2F256C7B214303BFC848894F418CF4.jpg">http://www.matrixgames ...

ORIGINAL: LuckyJim1010
And the consensus seems to be "Yep we would have fired at the Helicopters"

There are doctrinal procedures for firing main gun, coax, and caliber 50 at rotary AND fixed wing aircraft.

ORIGINAL: Capn Darwin

APP-6 Mil Symbols for Land Based Systems

Indeed it does.

Im accustomed to FM 1-02 Operational Terms and Graphics

<r> Infantry with Machine Guns are showing the incorrect NATO symbol for the machine gun.<br/>
<br/>
The is a rifle<br/>
<IMG src="http://fce-study.netdna-ssl.com/images/upload-flashcards/front/0/9/54990966_m.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="http://fce-study.netdna-ssl.com/images/upload-flashcards ...

<r> Any consideration given to changing units' map icons to NATO icons?<br/>
<br/>
I like seeing the vehicle silhouettes in the subunit viewer, but I would prefer something more realistic for the map.<br/>
<br/>
Maybe add an option to view map units as NATO icons?<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="http ...

Any chance we would see smoother unit movement. It would be nice to see continuous smooth movement versus the intermittent movement we have now

ORIGINAL: rjlee

Yes, they are replacements for the little red and blue crosses.

Digging the smoke!

I can actually see elevation!

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Mad Russian<br/>
<br/>
I was hoping for someone with some experience with Soviet equipment to chime here on this. We have some interest from that part of the world.<br/>
<br/>
Good Hunting.<br/>
<br/>
MR
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
<br/>
Good luck ...