F-14 with a TARPS pod might work post-2000

<r> Interesting article I came across about how sonobuoys have evolved over the years.<br/>
<br/>
<URL url="http://www.navairdevcen.org/PDF/THE%20EVOLUTION%20OF%20THE%20SONOBUOY.pdf"><LINK_TEXT text="http://www.navairdevcen.org/PDF/THE%20E ... NOBUOY.pdf">http://www.navairdevcen.org/PDF/THE ...

Probably, I got .13 too

Hmm,

Perhaps the report could be reformatted as:

Cargo Ships Available
Cargo Ships Used
Cargo Ships Lost
Cargo Ships Lost in Amphib TFs

This would make much more sense.

All my amphib TFs are in african ports prepping. Looking back a couple of saves it seems like there is this monotonic single amphib cargo ship getting sunk and the count keeps on climbing every turn.

<t> In the players handbook it mentions that Recon missions should always be towards the top of the list, as when resolving events they will occur earlier, and thus increase the success of missions later. There doesn't seem, however, a way to re-order missions -- at least I haven't figured it out ...

<r> Hello,<br/>
<br/>
I've run into something weird. In the Battleground Italy 43-45 scenario the Logistics Phase Event Log it keeps on reporting that I am loosing one Amphib Cargo ship a turn, even though none are active. Is this just an error with the report?<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Oddly enough, 430 FRXIV's were purpose built. <e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
From digging through my source (Spitfire: The History by Shacklady & Morgan) its not so much that they were purpose built, as they are FXIV and FXIVE that had cameras installed, and then ...

I'm digging into it; the scary thing is at certain points during the war, I don't think that the RAF could tell you either!

What are you looking for in terms of recon conversions? I have a book reference that may be of some help.

<t> Yeah, that's what I'm finding weird about this whole thing.<br/>
<br/>
For example, I'm currently on turn 32 of the scenario (Battleground Italy 43-45 v1.00.08)<br/>
<br/>
I moved some units to Brindisi, port is ok, railyard is ok, air base has been active since I moved units there from ...

Sure, I'll post it later this evening. I have autosave on, is there any particular save that would be best?

Edit: Adding details

Battleground Italy 43-45 (1.00.08)

(attached turn 32 save here)

Yeah I've checked to make sure that I'm not set to priority zero or anything, and all my bases show green. As I said, fuel, ammo, normal support all show up quickly. However the air support does not.

<t> I'm playing the Battleground Italy 43-45 scenario, and I've run into a lot of difficulty rebasing the tactical airforce because of missing air support elements. I've tried a couple of different ways of prepping airfields:<br/>
<br/>
* Setting the airfield to the proper HQ (tactical airforce ...

Any idea how you get them to build\upgrade airfields? Should I attach a construction battalion to one of the air forces? I thought I read that they can't take attachments though.....

<t> I'm learning the game, and I can't quite figure out how to use construction units. I've been perusing the manual and while it correctly points out that these units are attached to HQs, I can't figure out how to tell them to go to a specific hex. I've had some luck deploying them out of the 15th ...

i've had this happen a couple of times when doing the basic training: warship operations scenario

click on a sonobuoy and then the game throws an exception and then wants to quit because of an index being out of range in a list<t> type.

The object in post #49:

Is that a radial aircraft engine? Looks kinda like a twin wasp...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>
<br/>
On a transport enroute to Australia? Either from east or west. I don't know the history of that unit, but I would say from the east somewhere near Canton.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Historically the Canadian battalions ("C Force") had only arrived in mid ...

<r> I was reading through the other thread and it looks like the Japanese are going to have a greater number of submarines, with a more aggressive targeting doctrine. I'm wondering how this would impact allied ASW and escort allocations to the Pacific.<br/>
Some thoughts:<br/>

<UL><s>[ul]</s><LI ...