<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Perturabo<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mikeCK<br/>
<br/>
In The 1994 Chechnya war, this issue was evident. Russian troops failed to adapt quickly to combat conditions. NCOs and officers lacked training to carry out complex operations without upper ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Sorrow_Knight<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mikeCK<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Sorrow_Knight<br/>
Radios or not, sorry, but the OP is simply correct about Soviet doctrine. It was rigid. Whether you want it to have been or not, it was. In ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Sorrow_Knight<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Mark Florio<br/>
<br/>
4). Not every tank had radios and those that did were basically following a scripted attack. Jr leaders had very little tactical flexibility. The result was often, at least in ...

Assuming the photo ISNT fake...what does it suggest?

Well, that at some point in time, at some location, an F-22 was generally in the forward field of view of an SU-35. Wow. I’m sure the US Air Force is scrambling to find out how it was possible for someone to see an F-22

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Zaslon<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mikeCK<br/>
<br/>
Actually, I know what has been put out there by Russia. They have a mix<br/>
Of old SA-2s, Sa-5s SA-6s and a few Panstirs . Didn’t matter because none of them hit a darn thing except the ...

satellite images and on the ground footage of the buildings that, according to the Russian military officials, were undamaged by the US missiles

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XydrzyYtuq8

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Zaslon<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mikeCK<br/>
<br/>
If you think a Russian general in Moscow has the same credibility as to accuracy of a strike conducted by the United States As a US PENTAGON spokesman then I don’t see how we can have a ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Filitch<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Gunner98<br/>
Not sure why I should apologize for stating that the Russians are following their doctrine:
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
What mean this bulk of links?<br/>
US are much more "masters at ...

Edit

<t> Oldsarge, surely you know that Russian missiles are so good that they can take out 2 American Tomahawks. What is amazing is all those tomahawks the Syrians intercepted over targets that were never fired upon.<br/>
Apparently they were able to incinerate the missiles<br/>
As well as no one has ...

<r> <URL url="https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2018/04/14/us-launched-105-weapons-against-syria-with-none-intercepted-dod-says/"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/20 ... -dod-says/">https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2018/04/14/us-launched-105-weapons-against-syria-with ...

<t> If you think a Russian general in Moscow has the same credibility as to accuracy of a strike conducted by the United States As a US PENTAGON spokesman then I don’t see how we can have a conversation. Especially considering he claimed that nothing was damaged and 70% of the missiles were shot ...

You shouldnt

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: DWReese<br/>
<br/>
It's possible, actually very likely, that 100+ missiles were fired with the expectation that the Russian S-400, and other newer systems would be involved. Therefore, the abundance of ordinance guaranteed that it exceeded the saturation level ...

<t> “<br/>
Yes! All 100+ missiles hit this 3 targets. US missiles so weak that to destroy three buildings needed 100 missiles. Past time, after Shailat hitting we can count shell holes. Do you count 100 shell holes on this photo”<br/>
<br/>
Ok, so we are off the “70% of missiles were shot down ...

No one is going to respond to the strike. It was limited and neither the US not Russia has any interest in engaging the other

<t> Tomahawks have been doing this for 30 years; but I am interested to see how the JASSM-ERs launched from the B-1b bombers faired. I haven’t seen any footage of collateral damage indicating a miss but is going to take some time. This is the first use of that system I have heard of...had it been ...

True. Of course, IRL the military is trying to make it as lopsided and boring as possible. No one planning anything wants excitement!

But I agree, taking out 3 campuses with 110 tomahawks and JASSM-ERs isn’t a whole
Lot of fun to game

<t> There is no evidence they shot down anything and apparently didn’t even engage the missiles until after they were hitting.<br/>
One of the targets was in the middle of Damascus and was destroyed. A number of allied aircraft were used and none of those were shot down. <br/>
<br/>
The AD System ...

<t> Lol. No<br/>
Pentagon briefing says no missiles were shot down<br/>
Photos of the target shows all 3 completely destroyed. <br/>
<br/>
And no sir, no airbases were even attacked so where does this precise “19 missiles targeting an airbase were shot down” come from?<br/>
<br/>
And yes, I ...