<t> What are you talking about!? I'm not trolling. I'm trying to build a scenario, and as I come to a discrepancy, I report them, just like everyone else. I'm trying to help, in the same way I sent over 700 images for the db. Was that trolling or annoying?<br/>
<br/>
Every post I've put on here ...

<r> Hi all!<br/>
<br/>
According to the US Navy, the range for SM-2 Blk III/IIIA/IIIB (RIM-66K/L/M) is up to 90nm, yet in the db it states 50nm for all:<br/>
<URL url="http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2200&tid=1200&ct=2"><LINK_TEXT text="http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_displ ...

By active you mean flying/steaming around? [:)]
That would be awesome to play! And yeah, I know what you mean! Lol

<t> Crikey! What an addition! [X(]<br/>
Thanks Ragnar and Mike. <br/>
I guess the USN will be getting the F-14D a few years early (in my scen) hehe... [:D]<br/>
I like the look of the GD/W AAAM. SO much like AMRAAM, eh?<br/>
Baloogan, I think you'll like my scen, but it's shaping up that only a ...

Kinda tough to do with the current db. I'll be posting a list of hypothetical and pre-1980 platforms that HOPEFULLY will be added to DB3000 so I can complete my work. The RF-111C is one of many! [:)]
The list is not yet complete. Getting there though...

Cheers!

And the ability to disrupt/jam comms in some form, when comms are "activated" down the track...[8D]

Thanks for the support!! [8D]

Hi all!

Would capturing airbases and then being able to use them for your own forces be beyond the scope/capability of CMANO?

Cheers!

<r> Hi all!<br/>
<br/>
I'm looking for RAAF RF-111C in the db but can't see him. High priority as I need it for my scen [:)]<br/>
<URL url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-111C#RF-111C"><LINK_TEXT text="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dy ... 1C#RF-111C">http://en.wikipedia ...

Fair enough
I can still use it in my 1985-based mega-scen (basis of which is older platforms were updated and defence projects were smashed through).

Cheers lads!

<r> Have a look about halfway down, user name AAR90. <br/>
<URL url="http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/military/read.main/96279/"><LINK_TEXT text="http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forum ... ain/96279/">http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/military/read.main/96279/</LINK_TEXT></URL><br ...

Nice doc! [:)]

<r> Re EA-6B: I couldn't find any pics with more than one HARM on a rail. <br/>
<br/>
Plenty of F-14 w/ 6x Phoenix though! [:D]<br/>
Here's a sample. <br/>
<URL url="http://www.globalsecurity.org/jhtml/jframe.html#http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/f-14-6buff.jpg%7C ...

<r> Hi all!<br/>
<br/>
For the F-14 Tomcat there isn't a loadout with 6 AIM-54 Phoenix. I understand the argument that it's heavy and stresses the airframe etc etc, however, the aircraft <I><s>[i]</s>were_designed<e>[/i]</e></I> for a loadout of this weight. There are many pictures available ...

<r> Hi all (again)!<br/>
<br/>
Getting into building my mammoth scenario now. I've come across a possible discrepancy with the introduction of the Harpoon to the S-3A/B Viking fleet, and the in-service date of the "B" model.<br/>
<br/>
<URL url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_S-3_Viking ...

I had read something similar to that. Anyway, fair enough. [:)]

Thanks for the EH-60C check too [8D]

<t> Hi all!<br/>
<br/>
The ready times for the EH-60C Quick Fix seem off. 20hrs for a ferry mission and 20hrs for an offensive ECM mission.<br/>
<br/>
Also, should it take 21hrs to load 2 bombs onto, route plan, and brief the aircrew of, an F-117A? I understand that it's supposed to be only used ...

Roger [8D]

Thanks mate [:)]

Thanks Mike!

Yep, seen all that info. Kinda doesn't help when I'm writing a hypothetical scenario though. Plus, if it's designed for 50 aircraft, I think the db should reflect that. it's pretty cut-and-dried really.

Cheers!