Search found 67 matches

by Yamato_Blitzer
Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:05 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: March 1943

How are your Hellcat pools looking? [:)]
by Yamato_Blitzer
Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:20 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: March 1943

<t> Oh i'm fine Aztez, thanks for asking. Just haven't been on here very often. Which bases are you going for in cenpac and what intelligence/recon reports have you gotten from them?<br/>
<br/>
Ohhh and I saw these same results in my game against the AI. The shore gun problem. After that I made ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:53 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: February 1943

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Your losses are still nasty imo especially when you meet the CAP<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE> But we can't know that...The AE FOW is absolutely heavy and complete so you never really know anything unless your opponent tells you...you "might" get vague ideas from combat reports, at ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:23 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: November 1942

Well, one positive note: You don't seem to have lost TO many ships, i've seen much worse than that in other AAR's as well as my own games
by Yamato_Blitzer
Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:42 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: October 1942

Looks like he himself is in danger of being encircled in China....amazing turn around too
by Yamato_Blitzer
Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:52 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: October 1942

<t> Someone said it looked like you might be done for in this game. I really can't see how that's 100% possible. If Dave captures all of OZ, that does create a problem, but you're still in the game. You still hold India, if Dave had captured that THEN I would honestly say you've had it.<br/>
<br ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:18 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: September 1942

<r> That's a pretty damn solid force you've got there. So you guys are gonna duke it out at the Aleutians like that? I think it's safe to say this: That amount of naval force in an area that's so close to both Japan's Kuriles and America will definitely result in a mother of all battles. If you win ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:30 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: September 1942

Usually the Jap player has a whole lot of nothing stationed in that region, nothing to significant, and aztez can concentrate a ton of shit. It can be done, worth it if he can gain that region without any naval risk due to the weather
by Yamato_Blitzer
Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:35 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: September 1942

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>We are in no rush to commit into large scale offensive actions.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE> Forget that.<br/>
<br/>
Oh, and Kurilles looks awesome, won't bad weather work in your favor if he's trying to intervene and stop you? your ships get more damaged but what about ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:16 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: September 1942

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Yamato_Blitzer<br/>
<br/>
As you can see aztez, We're here to do you the favor of not getting your hopes up in certain aspects.[:D]
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Only certain aspects ? [:-]
<e ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:27 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: September 1942

As you can see aztez, We're here to do you the favor of not getting your hopes up in certain aspects.[:D]
by Yamato_Blitzer
Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:29 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: August 1942

<t> Allied torpedoes are almost literally garbage in early game. 9/10 won't detonate.<br/>
<br/>
Speaking of vets of past wars. My great grandpa had a hell of a time in Passchendaele in 1917, almost resembles a war movie.....Well some of you might know of the "muddy" conditions of that battle, men ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:17 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: August 1942

I wasn't trying to be a downer. China is lost but that's minor in the big picture, it's just frustrating, you still have a good chance here, it all comes down to those carriers.
by Yamato_Blitzer
Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:13 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: August 1942

<t> Ugh I Hope they introduce some major fixes next patch. August 1942 and the results are still the same as 1941, totally unrealistic. The main thing is China, obviously. Some major historical accuracy changes need to be introduced in China, there's no way China would have fallen this quickly in ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:41 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: July 1942

I just played my opponent over IM programs. That way when you are both on you can send turns back and forth, keeps a better flow on the game too.
by Yamato_Blitzer
Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:07 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: July 1942

<t> Xxzard has a point brett. It's hard to commit to an actual game, that's one reason I visit this AAR every 3 days, it fulfills my craving a bit because the actual game simply takes to much time. Even when you have nothing else to do it can be hard to commit. Extremely time consuming, that's also ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:33 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: Allied vs. Jap AI
Replies: 214
Views: 6063

RE: Allied vs. Jap AI

Why don't you just admit that the game is abandoned?[:'(]
by Yamato_Blitzer
Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:46 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: July 1942

<t> Let's say he doesn't go for NZ....Are you going to send your carriers to the Southern Flank of OZ and land reinforcements for a counter-invasion of OZ? It would be very possible. Realizing that possibility, I think it's a good bet that he will go for NZ, but on the other hand if he does that I ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:29 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: June 1942

<t> Yea early in the game 1 for 1 the Japs will probably win (except in a situation where the allied player is behind good forts), 2:1 or 3:1 they definitely win...simply a matter of picking a spot, doing recon, and sending in overwhelming force, because Dave has the offensive completely. Suva never ...
by Yamato_Blitzer
Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:38 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: ALLIED ONLY: aztez (A) vs erstad (J) ...2nd ROUND
Replies: 1984
Views: 29569

RE: Pearl Harbour hit hard by KB...

<t> I'm cirious...Have you set up the concentrated defense in China yet or made a detailed plan?<br/>
<br/>
Counter-attack isn't realistic at all yet and we've seen what happens when you counter-attack with lower quality and supplies. Even if you wear him down with decent sized forts, counter ...

Go to advanced search