Search found 69 matches

by War History
Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:45 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: upcoming patch - question
Replies: 54
Views: 832

RE: upcoming patch - question

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: John Lansford<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: War History<br/>
<br/>
The game "Pacific War" (Grigsby SSI 1995) had it set up so there was a percentage chance from 70 to 90 (over 90 experience was a 100% chance) so 5% per experience point of using ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:02 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: upcoming patch - question
Replies: 54
Views: 832

RE: upcoming patch - question

<t> The game "Pacific War" (Grigsby SSI 1995) had it set up so there was a percentage chance from 70 to 90 (over 90 experience was a 100% chance) so 5% per experience point of using alternate ordinance. I wouldn't be surprised if this same formula made it into stock WitP, but I can not confirm this ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:25 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Grollub<br/>
<br/>
I'm referring to War History, after he green buttoned both Mike Scholl and Smeulders.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Well as I said nothing they said really has anything to do with the discussion at hand. Both admitted that the Japanese got ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:22 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

Well, like I said to Mike before I hit the green button on him, when someone is going to approach something like this with a totally closed mind, all you can do is hit the button and move on [;)]
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:21 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: LRCap-.....no idea how to get it to work
Replies: 63
Views: 1583

RE: LRCap-.....no idea how to get it to work

<t> That may be your problem right there then, but I don't know for 100% certain. Zeros have a max range (with tanks) of 14 hexes this is true, but on an escort mission they would time their take-off to arrive on target at the same time as the bombers so minimal waste of fuel. For CAP on the other ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:44 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: LRCap-.....no idea how to get it to work
Replies: 63
Views: 1583

RE: LRCap-.....no idea how to get it to work

<t> If you have surface groups escorting, put a handful of float planes on CAP. Just the fact that they are intercepted will ward off a lot of the hits. And if the weather won't let them fly, then you can't get hit either.<br/>
<br/>
There could be other factors as to why your land based CAP didn ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:18 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<t> Explain these 2 things (reasonably):<br/>
<br/>
1) How did the Japanese know the units date and time of the Kiska landings. You presume Japanese intel was useless yet you can't explain how they had this information.<br/>
<br/>
2) How did the allies NOT know that the Japanese had pulled off ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:04 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports



Enough said then [:D]
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:01 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

I'm not. All I am saying is the Japanese should get SOMETHING. Are you saying they shouldn't?
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:39 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: War History<br/>
<br/>
Midway was the presumed target "AF". It was estimated that 4 carriers would spearhead the assault. <B><s>[b]</s>Now as for allied intel being weaker than historical, I would agree with that statement.<e>[/b]</e></B> The allies <I><s>[i]</s ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:24 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

I have already said the allied capibility is below what it should have been. Suggest you know what you are saying before you say it next time ;)
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:14 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Smeulders<br/>
<br/>
That would actually fall under the anecdotal evidence. It also tells us absolutely nothing about how the information was obtained by the Japanese or whether they even had the information. As someone said before, there weren't that many large ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:06 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Dobey<br/>
<br/>
Firstly I do like the way you keep asking everyone for documented evidence of their claims while providing nothing but anecdotal evedence of your own. But that is another matter.<br/>
<br/>
In regards to the passage underlined above; define ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:52 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mike scholl 1<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: War History<br/>
<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s>The only FACT that can be proved in any way is that the Japanese NEVER in the entire war got any code breaking intelligence that they could make military use of. That ...
by War History
Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:17 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: witpqs<br/>
<br/>
War History,<br/>
<br/>
I'm having trouble with your Midway bit. You say that Midway was not a code-breaking success, because if things were different than they were, then it wouldn't have been a success! Oh yeah, and there were some things ...
by War History
Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:32 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mike scholl 1<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: War History<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mike scholl 1<br/>
<br/>
It's easy to come up with "intel coups" that allowed the Allies to "bushwack" Japanese operations---Midway ...
by War History
Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:23 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Intel reports
Replies: 108
Views: 1467

RE: Intel reports

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Bradley7735<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mike scholl 1<br/>
<br/>
It's easy to come up with "intel coups" that allowed the Allies to "bushwack" Japanese operations---Midway and the Bismarck Sea come to mind readily.<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e ...
by War History
Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:58 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: House Rules Discussion
Replies: 92
Views: 1661

RE: House Rules Discussion

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Sun Tempest<br/>
<br/>
"No use of portions of parachute units to seize hex's"<br/>
<br/>
I don't think that there should be a rule for this. Sometimes I use paras to seize empty airbase, just before the landing, mainly because it is the only way to occupy an ...
by War History
Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:00 pm
Forum: The War Room
Topic: I need commentary on interesting IJN CV tactic
Replies: 18
Views: 326

RE: I need commentary on interesting IJN CV tactic

<t> I am not talking about any particular sized raid. I am referring to instances where the fighters (escort) appear as a sweep and then the strike comes in unescorted and gets slaughtered. In other words "the fighters get lost". And usually I am talking about carrier groups (but not in all ...
by War History
Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:51 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: House Rules Discussion
Replies: 92
Views: 1661

RE: House Rules Discussion

Right. 100% correct. They attacked in 1s and 2s. In GAME TERMS, this is called "naval search" not "naval attack". I rest my case.

Go to advanced search