<t> I think a large part of the Philippine Army should still be intact on March 1 1942, even on Luzon. Alternately, if you just want to be rid of all that, certain Japanese forces that were engaged in the reduction of PI, should be taken off map and placed in the reinforcements with appropriate ...

<t> Downloaded the beta.exe and scenario updates several times over the years, including today without issue. <br/>
I ran across this thread for the first time as it's been awhile. <br/>
When I download these in IE Explorer and save as exe as discussed in forum they trip Smartscreen.<br/>
If I ...

excellent! my thanks for the change list content!

Hans has asked if we have to restart, and Im guessing yes. but I'll second the question. I'm currently 4-13-42.

bumping to reraise issue of P40e arrivals in early 42

thanks

<t> Thanks Hans,<br/>
<br/>
I'm pretty sure by now that Ansi has always been in scen 1. I did as you suggest with a few wrinkles. I withdrew one I-16 group into the other which resulted in some reserve planes a few turns later. there is enough supply in the area to save them. I regard this as ...

<t> Thanks kfsgo for digging that up. Hilariously, I posted my question in a separate thread on 12-18 and stopped checking this thread til just now.<br/>
<br/>
I postulate that those 135 p40e that in the past arrived capetown 2-16-42 are related to issues raised in my post<br/>
<br/>
note that ...

thanks for that. maybe we'll get an 'official' confirm or deny, but the convoy lists under land unit arrivals don't seem to show any p40e

<t> US army production rates are the same between the two scenarios, among other things. <br/>
total P40e arrivals should be the same, unless there was a conscious decision to make it otherwise.<br/>
<br/>
I guess i was hoping at minimum that someone, perhaps andy mac would confirm that those ...

<t> I posted this in the spoiler thread 11 days ago. I am starting this thread in hopes of a reply<br/>
<br/>
On Jan 19, 1942, I have a total P40e availabilty discrepancy of -110 over my previous scenario 1 GC game while using ironman V3. This was derived from adding losses, active, pools, and ops ...

<t> I don't know if this is new thread worthy or not so I'll post here first.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
On Jan 19, 1942, I have a total P40e availabilty discrepancy of -110 over my previous scenario 1 GC game while using ironman V3. This was derived from adding losses, active, pools, and ops delays.<br ...

<t> before I drop this, I'll restate the "problem" as I see it for clarity.<br/>
<br/>
There is a selection on the air group screen that controls which request veteran page is initially opened.<br/>
it used to work with this relationship:<br/>
<br/>
any opened any<br/>
replacement opened group ...

<t> recently upgraded to q9b from ~q7 and restarted using ironman japan AI instead of scen1<br/>
<br/>
Request veteran window used to open to variable (any, reserve, TRACOM) tab based on the individual selection on each air group window.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Now it seems to open at the reserve tab ...

<t> you might want to check the pilots airgroup against newly arriving groups, rather than withdrawn groups. Sometimes pilots in these groups appear a few days early in the group pools yet they usually can't be accessed til the group fully arrives. I see this often with USN and USMC groups.<br ...

bump for my question about the disposition of Chinese base "Ansi". any word?


thanks

I don't know the answer for certain, but Ansi is in scenario 1 and has been for some time. It was in my original digital download install from sept 2010 for what thats worth. I now use the latest beta.
Its the road/trail junction at 80,33 south of Hami

I just started this Ironman V3 scenario. I notice that the chinese base Ansi is missing, which seems to eliminate te ability of the Hami I-16s to eventually fly out of their starting place. Is this an oversight, or am I supposed to divine a new way to rescue those planes?

thanks

Ok thanks. Thats kinda what i figured on the "No" additions.

Thanks to all for the replies

<t> Thanks especially for replies 7 9 and 10<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
question for HansBolter about your screenshots:<br/>
<br/>
I see the word No in yellow to the left of the supply oil resource and fuel values. I suppose this to be new functionality as I don't see that in 1106i<br/>
Could you ...

<t> Darwin and environs consistently starve. I know the supply path is bottlenecked at alice springs, but it seems perfectly capable of stealing supply back when i offload in darwin.<br/>
<br/>
At Townsville, I'm just frustrated that I can't keep the level above 20,000. It always falls back to ...

my version is 1106i