Is there any way to play the multiplayer scenarios yourself against the computer?

<t> Agreed....Lets get some clear definitions of these advanced options.<br/>
<br/>
I love the fact that this game is growing into something more and the creators aren't afraid of giving us new options. But clear definitions of these are important.<br/>
<br/>
Lets hope we see something soon, I ...

can a person win this campaign? or should one just play for minor victory like in the 43 DLC or else lose most your units?

I just thought the advancing artillery was Russian desperation after I destroyed all his other troops and tanks?

<t> Well I did very well on the first campaign and every DLC up until '43...Now that I'm there I couldn't agree more about the loss of units and the next scenerio then being almost imposible...I use to enjoy in the original series that I could change history, but there are just so many Russians that ...

<t> So playing the 1940 DLC in France near the end. Have a PanzerIIIF sitting in atown I took on the first turn (I know tanks are at high risk in towns, I get it, ive been playing PG for years) and here come along 2 French cavalry units (nothing else) and destroy my full strength experianced Tank ...

<t> I agree that BOTH types of campaigns would be fun to play.....If we wanted a game that was totally realistic I doubt so many wouldn't care that the way airpower works (compared to other units) makes no sense (planes stay in the air for days at a time without refueling).......Anyway, I get it ...

<t> In my opinion it really helps to know a little history. I'm not saying you have to know about every plane and tank. But people that know "tank destroyers" didnt actually ever win major battles 1 vs 1 with tanks, well knowing this is something I am guessing the designers think most people have ...

<t> OK, Ill give you that one that they do cover an area. But shouldn 't it be an airfield counter or something then if that's the concept? And again why would they need to fly to another airfield and re-fuel if this were the case? Not to mention that nothing ever really lands at an airfield ...

Yes, I have considerd this concept. But then why would they need to re-fuel at an airstrip? And wouldnt fighters then be able to cover/protect multiple units in there zone of influece?

Sorry, not trying to be dificult. I just would like something that was a little more realistic.

<t> Ok, I love the game and have played everything in the old General series. But I can't help but wonder why in this modern version were still playing with aircraft that dont make sense in the way they function? Aircraft stay in the air for what would amount to days or weeks at a time. Why can't we ...