<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Casinn<br/>
<br/>
Probably on the list somewhere still, look at the running poll to see how many items people are hoping for that may come along one day. (in addition to the thousand or so that the devs have delivered over the last year or so)
<e>[/quote]</e ...

<t> This is something I have wanted for a very long time...the ability to pull up a list of which platforms are detecting the contact, and with what sensor. Seems to me the obvious place for it would be on the "Contact Report" dialog. Seems like it would be a trivial to add (but very useful ...

FWIW, I have about 10 hours in the game and have not had a single crash or freeze. Been extremely stable for me.

Review is back up at SimHQ now, so looks like this whole argument is moot. Carry on...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: tevans6220<br/>
As I said before, it's not up to the reviewer to convince me to buy. That job belongs to the publisher/devs. Reviews don't have to be fair or balanced.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
FWIW, I disagree completely with this. I absolutely expect ...

<r> I agree with thewood on this. IMHO, the fairness of the review itself is irrelevant. I believe that SimHQ should not have published a review from someone with a clear personal connection/conflict with the subject of the review without disclosing that conflict. I don't care if the review was the ...

<t> To my mind, this is important information when you have a contact that is only detected by a very few sensors For example, knowing which units are detecting which contact lets you make decisions about how to move/retask assets without losing a lock on the contact. <br/>
<br/>
To that end, I ...

<t> For the folks that disagree with Matrix's business model and that strongly believe there is a great untapped wargamer market out there, it seems like the right capitalistic answer is to start up a competing business. Pull together a business plan, a pitch, and some funds/investors. Then, go out ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Abbeville_01<br/>
(1)I dont care if you like KSP, I care why you dismised it as a comparable item, for it being a ridiculous thing (dont tell me you didnt intended to put it in that place)<br/>
(2)Oh, I see... Its my english... Lets put it this way, do you ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Tomn<br/>
Seriously, dude, try the KSP demo. The Kerbals are a very small part of the actual game, and you'll argue much better once you give it a go - you may even find that you can overlook the Kerbals entirely and enjoy it. I'm telling you, the demo is free of ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Abbeville_01<br/>
(1) You implied ksp does not deserves to be compared, the way you put it, you are trying to make it look ridículous. And that is unfair.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
The context of the conversation was marketing. In terms of marketing, it ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Abbeville_01<br/>
You dont know what you are talking about. There is a lot more than that in KSP, you are not being fair with that comment.<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Nowhere in my post did I say or imply that there was not "a lot more than that in KSP." I ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: dutchman55555<br/>
Get your Kerbals to the Mun and back...if you still declare it to not be an in-depth simulation (you literally have to understand college-level Physics to succeed) then I'll accept that. I'll think you're crazy, but I'll accept it.
<e>[/quote ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Nemo84<br/>
Put the criteria tight enough and it's easy to dismiss just about any example. I would also say that features such as pretty graphics and an additional optional arcade mode require significant development resource and would thus warrant an ever ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Xornox<br/>
Actually it is one of the best rocket simulations available currently (at least I do not know better). I learnt basics of orbital flying with it. <br/>
<br/>
Do not let looks to deceive you. The simulation may be excellent although little yellow ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Nemo84<br/>
It's a game that requires the player to perform realistic orbital maneuvers, with all the corresponding calculations and complexity. They merely had the good business sense to dress it up in an attractive package. All that stuff you mention is ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Tomn<br/>
I point to Kerbal Space Program, a game that is literally about rocket science.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
While not addressing the rest of your points, I just want to note that Kerbal Space Program may not be the best example. I am always ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: JOhnnyr<br/>
<br/>
Well, the game <I><s>[i]</s>seems<e>[/i]</e></I> like it could be interesting, but right now I'm not having any fun due to the extremely poor performance. The UI is sluggish and often takes multiple clicks to register anything, Zooming takes ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Nemo84<br/>
Hardcore flight sims such as the DCS series have similar levels of complexity, far higher production values, require an additional investment of several hundred dollars in peripheral hardware and yet somehow currently sell extremely well on Steam ...

I feel like a moron since I still can't seem to get a zip file to work. However, renaming the .save file to a .txt file seemed to do the trick. Does that get you what you need?