Search found 545 matches

by Tcao
Tue Jul 08, 2025 9:02 pm
Forum: Scenario Data / Map Issues
Topic: Soviet SMG Squad sizes [ID:798, ID:815]
Replies: 9
Views: 802

Re: Soviet SMG Squad sizes [ID:798, ID:815]

There is a similar discussion on combat mission forum. Hopefully that helps

https://community.battlefront.com/topic ... mpany-oob/
by Tcao
Tue Jul 08, 2025 2:33 am
Forum: Rule the Waves 3
Topic: The Battle of Jutland - Battleship Showdown (Full Documentary)
Replies: 0
Views: 1377

The Battle of Jutland - Battleship Showdown (Full Documentary)

The Battle of Jutland - Battleship Showdown (Full Documentary) ---- Drachinifel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhQow54xWFI
by Tcao
Fri Jun 27, 2025 8:09 pm
Forum: Flashpoint Campaigns Southern Storm
Topic: what's wrong on NATO's command cycle?
Replies: 1
Views: 634

what's wrong on NATO's command cycle?

they seem to be longer compared to WP's

for example
in scenario "Final"
Nato command cycle and WP's command cycle is 25 min vs 22 min
the EW strength is Low vs Medium

Overture
30 min vs 22 min
Low vs High

Steel rain
32 min vs 37 min
Medium vs High

An autobahn too far
19min vs 26 min
Medium vs ...
by Tcao
Fri Jun 27, 2025 6:41 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: CMO air to air weapon damage and A/C damage
Replies: 2
Views: 244

CMO air to air weapon damage and A/C damage

I'd like to take a moment here to complain about the low damage to aircraft structures and subsystems from anti-air weapons in CMO . I've had multiple instances where an enemy aircraft took a hit from an air-to-air missile, got damaged, then turned around and fired a radar-guided missile right back ...
by Tcao
Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:02 pm
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: Is the PL-15 this good?
Replies: 12
Views: 651

Re: Is the PL-15 this good?



Are you using any kinetic methods to degrade ground based AD, i.e. ARMs?

I usually avoid SEAD missions when in contested airspace, it is a capability I am yet to develop.
even so the Sim is set up such that there are 2 SAM Bty's of HQ-16 with a 50% probability of appearing each,
an ARM strike ...
by Tcao
Thu Jun 26, 2025 8:47 pm
Forum: Flashpoint Campaigns Southern Storm
Topic: Prepared Fallback Positions?
Replies: 3
Views: 286

Re: Prepared Fallback Positions?

We can still setup a what I called "poor man's fighting withdrawal tactic"

the method is explained here:

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 0#p5164460

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... l#p5160852
by Tcao
Thu Jun 26, 2025 3:42 pm
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: Is the PL-15 this good?
Replies: 12
Views: 651

Re: Is the PL-15 this good?

Can you please share your scenario? It sounds like a very challenging scenario and I like challenge.

Undoubtedly, you are the technologically inferior side. In this kind of engagement, the only hope lies in making up for it through tactics and sheer numbers.

It seems that the side you're ...
by Tcao
Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:13 pm
Forum: The War Room
Topic: Following the fuel: how the world tracked the B-2 diversion flights
Replies: 0
Views: 785

Following the fuel: how the world tracked the B-2 diversion flights

https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/flight-tracking-news/special-aircraft-tracking/how-the-world-tracked-the-b2-diversion-flights/?fbclid=IwY2xjawLHyCFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFidWZPTFpsZmVadGdPZkxrAR4u_FXiWZThVBE8WntNZ3GwPZHvbXN7L09-BxMykIdRUzANFYKE2PQ4GqfFow_aem_04fsdf5dOrf075S-bT7k7g


A very ...
by Tcao
Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:07 pm
Forum: Flashpoint Campaigns Southern Storm
Topic: Bushwhacking tanks
Replies: 1
Views: 206

Re: Bushwhacking tanks

the current game mechanism needs to add more penalty for mechanized troops move through dense forest.

if my memory is correct, move deliberate will take 2 min to move through an open hex (500m) , but it is only 10 min to move though a Forest hex (5% mobility)
by Tcao
Fri Jun 20, 2025 2:23 am
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: Each campaign and scenario need to re-tuned by the devs after the introduction of new missile mechanics
Replies: 48
Views: 4744

Re: Each campaign and scenario need to re-tuned by the devs after the introduction of new missile mechanics


Hi Tcao, you are absolutely right, my fault. Here is the script with the function, (I edit the first script and when copy/paste I didn't copy the SetDoctrineUnit function)

I've added to the random function more numbers to vary the enemy range a little bit more.

Another thing to keep in mind is ...
by Tcao
Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:25 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Is the AIM-120D AMRAAM really that bad?
Replies: 12
Views: 912

Re: Is the AIM-120D AMRAAM really that bad?

I would guess your A/C is in low altitude
by Tcao
Sun Jun 15, 2025 6:34 pm
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: Operation "Rising Lion": The Day has Come!
Replies: 27
Views: 2055

Re: Operation "Rising Lion": The Day has Come!

Just saw this article

https://www.guancha.cn/haimasi/2025_06_15_779418.shtml

https://www.163.com/dy/article/K23EQIJU051481US.html

Why Is Iran’s Mid‑Range Missile Retaliation So Poor?
– June 15, 2025


Summary of the article

1. Overview of the Latest Escalation
Israel and Iran’s new ...
by Tcao
Fri Jun 13, 2025 3:46 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Question, unassign under attack
Replies: 20
Views: 736

Re: Question, unassign under attack


This is what happens right now in the unit panel when you try to unassign a unit engaged defensive.



UED.gif


The only solution is to change the defensive doctrine. Go to the unit's ROE (or mission ROE, side ROE, depends on what you want to achieve ) and change automatic defensive to "No"
by Tcao
Fri Jun 13, 2025 3:37 pm
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: New doctrine suggestion
Replies: 10
Views: 589

Re: New doctrine suggestion



1, Please add a standoff doctrine for support aircraft and support mission. For example, an AEW detected an unidentified bogey at 50nm distance, that will trigger the standoff stance. AEW turn off the radar (or can keep radar on, depending on the doctrine setting), keep the distance with the ...
by Tcao
Thu Jun 12, 2025 11:36 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD] Is this a bug or WAD, early era RWR cannot detect the "A" Band radar
Replies: 19
Views: 530

Re: [WAD] Is this a bug or WAD, early era RWR cannot detect the "A" Band radar




the missile would still lack the precision required to engage the target effectively. Passive detection alone typically doesn't provide a sufficiently accurate fix for targeting unless the radar continues to emit throughout the missile's time of flight.
Older HARMs were heavily dependent on ...
by Tcao
Wed Jun 11, 2025 7:52 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD] Is this a bug or WAD, early era RWR cannot detect the "A" Band radar
Replies: 19
Views: 530

Re: [WAD] Is this a bug or WAD, early era RWR cannot detect the "A" Band radar


the missile would still lack the precision required to engage the target effectively. Passive detection alone typically doesn't provide a sufficiently accurate fix for targeting unless the radar continues to emit throughout the missile's time of flight.
Older HARMs were heavily dependent on the ...
by Tcao
Mon Jun 09, 2025 10:57 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD] Is this a bug or WAD, early era RWR cannot detect the "A" Band radar
Replies: 19
Views: 530

Re: [WAD] Is this a bug or WAD, early era RWR cannot detect the "A" Band radar

Copy that and make sense. But that brings up a tactical problem in CMO, these late 70's early 80's SEAD A/C cannot engage these A band search radar independently.
ARM vs P-14.jpg
ARM vs P-14.jpg (124.16 KiB) Viewed 442 times

Looks like the player need to bring an ELINT A/C like EP-3 or RC-135 to share the target info with SEAD A/C first
by Tcao
Mon Jun 09, 2025 1:42 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD] Is this a bug or WAD, early era RWR cannot detect the "A" Band radar
Replies: 19
Views: 530

[WAD] Is this a bug or WAD, early era RWR cannot detect the "A" Band radar

Please see attached file
A-7, F-4G and A-6, SEAD aircraft that has early 80's RWR and late 70's technology RWR cannot detect the "A" Band search radars emissions.

is this a bug or WAD?
by Tcao
Wed Jun 04, 2025 10:35 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD+TWEAK][1567.6] EODAS and IRST nerfed too much?
Replies: 5
Views: 399

Re: [1567.6] EODAS and IRST nerfed too much?


You are using a fairly old database version. After a DB update, EODAS seems to be getting aircraft detections reliably at around 35nm, which tracks with public information.


I have updated the DB to 5.11, it is still the same reslut
5/23/2025 1:32:44 PM - [1] New contact! Designated BOGEY #13 ...

Go to advanced search