<t> If you are not familiar with the GMAP overlay technique i help you out with lat/long data:<br/>
<br/>
Stanley Runway, direction 09/27 (middle of the RW) = 51 41 09 W57 46 39<br/>
Control Tower = S51 41 15 W57 46 44<br/>
Airport Terminal = Control Tower<br/>
A/C Tarmac Space (4x Large Air ...

<r> <LINK><s>[link]</s>https://img.xrmb2.net/images/121768.jpeg<e>[/link]</e></LINK><br/>
<br/>
Slight alignment error of a prominent location of this mission.<br/>
Can correct it myself of course, but fiddling with the editor of the opposing/enemy side may spoil the whole mission.<br/>
<br ...

Speaking of SSN-754's theater of operation picture...
I am curious how the non-communication mechanic for submarines unfolds in general and here in this LIVE scenario. About the mechanic i have nothing found so far on YT.

Wow, a perfect intro for a detailed scenario or even an exciting book.
But it could be difficult to implement because of CMO's limited ground operation capabilities.
Anyway i wish best of luck.

Edit: also great scenario cover picture.

<t> Actual a basic simple solution exists already. A Chinese flight fan is able to steer CMANO aircraft with his throttle and joystick: dive, climb, accelerate, slow down and route/course change. Combine this with TacView and you will have a simple flightsim. But don't count on the devs. They are ...

SeaHag has a huge impact on the CPU (usage: 34%). commandTalk almost none (CPU usage only 0.4%). The main disadvantage of commandTalk is: you are restricted to 37 commands.
If you add an additional command (2 lines) to the CommandTalk.ini commandTalk does not start.

ORIGINAL: B52H

As a complement to several scenarios I have posted,...

Judging from the scen-date CWCAFR is related to this thread.

What about WW3GER 0.5 Black Horse Riders?
Are there any more scenarios?

<r> I am afraid of the system specs and the initial bugs after release.<br/>
<br/>
Here this guy plays the actual cmano in 1:1 time but the computer cant handle it. It's more 1:1.5sec and it gets worse and worse in the following parts.<br/>
<br/>
(YT: Modern Air Naval Operations | Russia vs NATO ...

Thx for adding more pages to the H2-Guide.

What i like is Swedin's documentary writing style (have read the first pages on "inside ebooks"/amazon). Maybe i pick up the book, maybe.

Downloading...

The name implies that this scenario begins after Chapter 8 "Angels wheep, the fire comes"?

New messages/briefing looking good.

An easy pick. I am at chapter 4. I will take some more time to reach chapter 18 where the Thunderclap scenario is supposed to be performed.

+1 for adding real flying sequences

If you change the default heading of the lead element "runway 15/33" to the real heading (here 150° or 330°) then aircrafts doing the correct landing/starting pattern.

Simulations that match reality as closely as possible are always welcome.

Looks excellent. A lot can be learned from a scenario like that.

Actual "civilians" could be anything: a retired President of the USA, a sub commander on vacation with binoculars or your neighbour.
So the detection range is somehow plausible.

Good find.
Detection of an enemy sub with active radar on or off is the same. Which is nonsense.

ORIGINAL: Whicker
...
it would be super cool - you could style a pop up message really well and include images and videos as needed.

He is right