Vic wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 4:20 pm yes, my apologies. its fixed again with subversion Q

Nice. And not sure when that bug was introduced, but found the following randomly:

Table 339) 105: Major Regime Stories (409):
In row 2 "REGKEY.word + dth(1,00)" seems to be wrong, rolling a 00, instead of the usual 100.

Is the S&S editor start up bugged again with the latest p one?

One important factor should be jobs available, as well as wages. Both private / public jobs may be more readily available and/or pay more than you do.

Noticed this one as well

<r> Even with the latest and improved v1.04-beta10 version, quite a few people still seem to be concerned about the logistics system being too difficult to handle.<br/>
<br/>
So far, all effort seems to have been focused on trying to tweak the entire system to somehow strike the perfect balance ...

<t> Interesting take on the SHQs. I would agree that's an area causing trouble. Players really want to avoid setting up more SHQs which isn't a good sign indeed.<br/>
<br/>
When it comes to logistics, I feel what this game really needs in that area is more options to allow people to play it "their ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Vic<br/>
<br/>
Posted beta10. Replaced the logistics change I made in beta9 by a mechanism that is more interesting (and also much less big a change for people who liked the system before that beta9 change)
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Haven't played with it ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Destragon<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Vhalor<br/>
<br/>
You have logistics problems? Construct more logistical assets! It was that simple. Sure, depending on other factors, the positive impact would vary, but that's rather straight forward and really ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Vic<br/>
<br/>
Thanks for the feedback everybody.<br/>
<br/>
For the moment I think cutting of the logistics for a truck/rail station when reaching another station is a good one.<br/>
<br/>
The big argument for me is:<br/>
1) that when you look at the logs ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: GodwinW<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>-In order to get the Logistics system more comprehensible I added a rule change. Once a runner from one logistical Assets encounters another logistical Asset it stops there. This is the only sane way to avoid the big majority ...

Would be a nice addition!

You can already do this, just split off the transports to a new Battlegroup. You can rejoin them later too.

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Fizbun<br/>
<br/>
I'd really like if it would be possible to design your own OOB's/Brigade templates and choose what type of units go into my batallions, like it is possible in Hearts of Iron 4. It is casual but doesnt feel as dumb and restricted.
<e>[/quote ...

<t> Secretary can be a good source of leaders. They get immediately replaced with someone else as well. If you have no one to replace them with, someone new is generated. Sometimes the replacement can be highly skilled as well! So if you have a lot of PP to burn and lack leaders, it's an interesting ...

History Classes is indeed a nice addition. Anything to fine tune your planets is always welcomed.

I agree more direct control when it comes to the composition would be a welcomed change.

Now about the randomness, this game is highly random in most aspects, so reducing it somewhat in a few areas like this one should be no issue at all.

Vic is tearing through the forums right now, especially the "infamous" Suggestions and Feedback one!

So I just wanted to let you know that's it's great to see such a dedicated developer at work. Greatly appreciate all the effort!

ORIGINAL: Vic

For beta6 added:
-In higher difficulty levels Minors do not have the AI combat bonus against a Major AI

Interesting change. Might really spice things up a bit on extreme.

The most vital map mode of them all is missing a hotkey as well. Bottleneck map mode surly should have one!

<t> The current Staff Council and OOB system is certainly one of the weaker points of this game. Way too much investment necessary for mostly questionable returns on top. Which is unfortunate, because this area could be a lot of fun, if it would be changed to something more meaningful and engaging ...