Can you try the beta version in steam?

unfortunately, I don't have free space for beta. But was any change in rendering (despite the mentioned web-view rendering) done there?


There have been quite a few tweaks on the map engine. When possible for you, we'd like you to give the public beta ...

We are adding some performance tweaks on the render loop for the next update. When the update is released, please give this another go and let us know. Thanks!


I have AMD Ryzen 7 with integrated graphics and GPU load is still 100% with layers ON (start screen)
game version 1.06.1328.18 ...

blu3s wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2024 6:49 pm Can you try the beta version in steam?

unfortunately, I don't have free space for beta. But was any change in rendering (despite the mentioned web-view rendering) done there?

Dimitris wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 4:42 am We are adding some performance tweaks on the render loop for the next update. When the update is released, please give this another go and let us know. Thanks!

I have AMD Ryzen 7 with integrated graphics and GPU load is still 100% with layers ON (start screen)
game version 1.06.1328.18

Hello,
is there any way to see the zoom level of a particular visual sensor?
I saw old wiki at baloogancampaign had it, but it doesn't work properly now.
Regards

You did great progress in beta against the official, but I wonder is it specially designed for beta that fuel consumption isn't counted correctly (same as in 1.04)?
I mean heavily loaded plane is consuming the same as an empty one, so it looks like additional weight and drag are not counted in beta

I'd like to raise this, as it has a huge impact on mission planning and realism.

I checked in "official" and it works well there. Planes with different loadout consume different amounts of fuel.
But in beta, it doesn't work.

Please let me know if is it a known defect and is and will be fixed ...

I created AEW mission with active elimination only on-station. It's like 30nm between two points.
Then I created flight plans for continuous coverage. Auto-generated loop has a leg of 50nm.

Now I found that my AEW plane is eliminating only inside this 30nm mission zone, not the whole auto-generated ...

Hello,
here SSN700 asked for sprint and drift @ avg 25kt at 400ft depth.
Initial drifting was ok, but then she started switching flank/creep every second so the speed is still 5kt

I think it doesn't work from "Tiny".

In the mission, there are two F/A-18C with 3 drop tanks.
1st with Mk84, radius in DB is 340nm
2nd is a ferry, radius is 1950nm / 2 = 975nm
but both have a fuel burn of 27.2 kg/min

The second Flight is a pair of A-6E with 22 Mk-82 each.
One plane strikes a ...

Hello,
is it possible to show arcs only for emitting radars or show them in a different way (Map / ContactEmission is not the best solution I think)

Thank you for your answers.

I think shooting AGM-62 from 30nm with a seeker of 12nm is OK cause of LOAL capability and we are firing to a known target.
But is it ok to fire two+ 'rockets' same time with man-in-the-loop? It could be possible but I wonder if it's a common practice.
The ideal scenario ...

I think it has already been done, but in 1267.1 same planes (F-14A in the attached scenario) consume the same amount of fuel with different loadouts (a ferry and heavy CAP loadout).
It makes a Heavy CAP plane to stay 4h 40 mins till bingo at 150nm instead of 96 min as in the database.

Is it WAD that AGM-62 could be launched simultaneously for a couple of targets from one platform? (F/A-18)
Should it be 1 target at a time like LGB? (F-16)

Shooting from 30nm with a seeker max range of 12nm is more like BOL with precise targeting later via DL, as I got it

For example:
Missle #759 AA-6A has a distance of 30nm in DB3K v.493, but in DB3K v.495 it has a distance of only 16.2nm

It looks like the distance became 30km somehow that is equal to 16.2nm

PS More missiles are affected

PPS Also, found that B52 frontal signature is 7585 sq. m. in DB v495 vs 107 ...

Hi,
Scenario: Flight Tutorial 7 - AAW 5
When MiG-31BM took off they immediately returned to base with "RTB - Exhaustion" state
Platform affected: #3963

I have it too but like in 50% cases. Transit to station is at 2k then planes go up to 36k

<t> I think it works for modern systems, but not for the soviet 60's one.<br/>
Just like acoustics in sub sims. If you play a WW2 one - you can only detect is it a warship or merchant, but in modern you can detect ship type, how many blades it has and so on<br/>
<br/>
I don't think anyone can say ...

<t> Thank you for info about SAM simulator, looks interesting.<br/>
<br/>
I heard (it was a video on YT with a man who served at Soviet PVO on SA-5) that you as an operator can know target size by signal/distance ratio and what engines it has because props made a huge splash on screens.<br/>
<br ...

<t> Hello,<br/>
at attached scenario we have:<br/>
F-16CM40 with RWR only<br/>
F/A-18A with RWR and HARMs (passive seeker)<br/>
F-16CM40 with HTS and HARMs<br/>
E-3 with ELINT<br/>
<br/>
on another side we have (all are emitting):<br/>
P-18 (spoon rest D)<br/>
AN/FPS-113<br/>
SA-2d<br ...