I did. I had three EC-707 and along with three Gulfstream G550 AEW deployed. The record is unclear on how many of these aircraft were used. I may have deviated from history on that.



I asked because the out of comms units may ditch due to fuel, not important if the Turkish F-16s did not ...

Nikel wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2026 7:28 am You did not use Israel Comms Jammers?

I did. I had three EC-707 and along with three Gulfstream G550 AEW deployed. The record is unclear on how many of these aircraft were used. I may have deviated from history on that.

I like playing and experimenting with historical recreations. A scenario recreating Operation Orchard is right in my wheelhouse. It took several tries to achieve a victory. First attempt was failure with only 15 points. Another attempt I got 115 points. Finally I achieved major victory with 250 ...

This worked fine in v1.10 Build 1900.8 in game mode on Steam. Aircraft made it to the patrol area with no issue.

Has the scenario been played outside of the editor? I asked because using flight plans won't work properly with the No-Nav Zones in game mode, but will work properly in editor mode. In game mode aircraft linger at WP2/3 and won't proceed. In editor mode, they move as they should. I'm trying to use ...

Knightpawn wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2026 7:14 pm Much appreciated. Thanks a lot

You're welcome. Cheers

Is there a scenario about Israel's strike of Al Kibar site in Syria back in 2007? If not, I am considering taking upon the task.


I have played around with that mission, but never really created a finished scenario. Here is a custom layer for the Al Kibar site I had filed away, pre-strike from ...

I agree with Kushan. You should be using either QGIS or SAS.Planet for custom overlays. I regularly use QGIS. There might be a bit of a learning curve. If all you want to do is create custom overlays you should be able to start making them fairly quickly. There might some instructions already posted ...

After another interesting trial and error session with the AI, this code seems to be successful.

May you try it?


As you have seen, the code runs successfully, but attaches a Grave Stone to TEL 6 allowing just TEL 6 to launch. It does not connect the Grave Stone that is attached to the Command ...

I've passed the scenario. In the end I had to do a bit of micro to make sure assigned aircraft hit targets, as quite a few would do one pass without dropping. But unassigning them and manually targeting both occupied revetments and hangars seems to have paid off.

Thanks for all the help everyone ...

Thanks for the quick response.

There has been some conversation about this recently on Discord and Dimitris suggested a post to the Tech Forum in the event that the devs might want to take a look. So here goes.

I have experimented with trying to create a functioning SAM site that is made up of individual units and grouped ...

One thing I'm not too sure about, I do my recce work on a couple of airfields to the west. After this I update the target list for my strikes to hit the occupied revetments. But, these flights are already planned and sometimes in the air. To add these new targets do I need to regenerate the flight ...

There is also an Air Campaign book published by Osprey. Can be previewed in Google books.

I wonder if the astonishing results the Israeli side managed to get in the war, can be accomplished in the scenario, anyone?


I have that book. It does have some good information for the Israeli strike ...

I haven't played this one for a while, but it is one of my favorite scenarios. IIRC I have never gotten more than 500 points. Very challenging scenario and a good one to learn how to manage multiple strikes. Time to revisit and play it with the latest build.

Jeffrey Pelt: Mr. Ambassador, you have nearly a hundred naval vessels operating in the North Atlantic right now. Your aircraft has dropped enough sonar buoys so that a man could walk from Greenland to Iceland to Scotland without getting his feet wet. Now, shall we dispense with the bull?
Ambassador ...

Nikel wrote: Wed May 13, 2026 2:36 pm There is a P Gatcomb tutorial explaining those numbers.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc4pohpgRmU

Just watched that video. Thanks for posting it.

I've seen in scripts ships referred by the codes shown in the example below:

Chinese Type 054A Frigate (2495_4928|17470 and 2495_3731|5431)

Thanks.


Off the top of my head I can't tell what those numbers might be referring too from that snippet. It you post the script the snippet came from it ...

thewood1 wrote: Mon May 04, 2026 11:57 am I think its not just the browser. Its the security settings on the browser. There is a difference between Chrome defaults and Edge.

That makes sense. I don't typically use Edge but, for downloading 1852 it worked fine.

As a practical, technical and mission-relevant matter, what do people think of this? Unclear if these will ever get built, but the stated goal is two of them by 2028. Are we entering a new golden age for the battleship? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump-class_battleship


I don’t believe ship ...