Search found 4 matches

by QuiGon90
Mon Mar 31, 2025 3:05 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [FIXED] Fail Safe Scenario 1: Wrong aircraft
Replies: 5
Views: 562

Re: Fail Safe Scenario 1: Wrong aircraft


This is correct. The F-104G is not capable of in-flight refueling. On the other hand, USAF F-104Cs (and CF-104s) did have a refuelling probe. The scenario designer could perhaps replace the -Gs with some -Cs (although I doubt the Scimitar was ever cleared to AAR the F-104)?

The fact that there ...
by QuiGon90
Wed Mar 12, 2025 9:22 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [FIXED] Fail Safe Scenario 1: Wrong aircraft
Replies: 5
Views: 562

Re: Fail Safe Scenario 1: Wrong aircraft

So this issue has been fixed in the recent update, which replaced the F-105s with F-104s, but there's another mistake now: Additional buddy tankers have been added in order to provide AAR for the F-104s as the changelog says, but the F-104s aren't even AAR capable...

* Fail Safe - 1. Down Bird ...
by QuiGon90
Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:10 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [FIXED] Fail Safe Scenario 1: Wrong aircraft
Replies: 5
Views: 562

[FIXED] Fail Safe Scenario 1: Wrong aircraft

The Briefing of scenario 1 (Down Bird) says that there are F-104 Starfighter stationed at Banak Air Base (which makes sense as Norways operated F-104s back then), but instead there are F-105s (which Norway never had).
by QuiGon90
Sun Sep 08, 2024 1:37 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [FIXED] 1436: SAM engages targets flying below its minimum target altitude
Replies: 3
Views: 522

[FIXED] 1436: SAM engages targets flying below its minimum target altitude

I was playing the Shifting Sands campaign where I wanted to avoid Egyptian SA-2f (CWDB #720) by flying beneath their minimum target altitude of 1000ft AGL, but they engaged my aircraft regardless. So I went ahead and reproduced the situation in a small test mission with the same result: https ...

Go to advanced search