Ki 61b do not upgrades to Ki 61c . I don't see any reason why not.
Ki 61 seems to be an ugly duck for who edited aircraft with mvr unjustifiable going of a cliff and getting worse than even 2 engine fighter bombers and bombers.

This was an unnatural aicraft for Japan but still 3000 were build ...

dupe

TF is in Rangoon.

When i do a LRCAP and TF is outside range it warns me it is.

CAP/LRCAP 3 hex should not override aircraft capable range.

There is no other unit with this model nearby.

There is also the issue of 4min warning.

FOW never seen a combat report wrongly ID's own air unit, and the ...

I have another bug (graphic?), in some squadrons with long roster of pilots, scrolling do not show all. I dont think this occurred at game start. I am in mid 43 PBEM.

witpbug-4.jpg witpbug3.jpg witpbug1.jpg

here it is.


several things wrong,

a6m5 restricted to a 5 range to cover a TF when passes a certain area(edited)

how magically it got drop tanks to reach Prome.

how 4 min warning can lead to an interception if it was even over the said TF at 7 range ...

1 - Why the barge/landing craft code that make it is impossible to be hit by aircraft except at 100ft was not implemented to PT´s too? we have torpedo bombers going after PTs...

2 - Bug i have an A6m5 stationed in Tavoy in a LRCAP with a maximum 5 hex range for a TF, it is leaking to Prome at 10 ...

Matsu class DD the 4 DC are forward...Tachibana 5.

Thanks. I will change the DC facings to rear. I am also revising some of the CA and CL class tonnages to make them more consistent.

I haven't posted here in a while as I have been busy with other stuff, but I have also been working on the ...

It uses the same menu as Japanese side and that one has the engines too.

Furutaka/ Aoba class cruisers have more tonnage in game than the Clevelands.

One comes after the other. One is the Army, one is the Navy, I think. I do not have the editor open just now

No this version appear at same time.

IJA Ki 115b and IJN Toka are different names for the same aircraft, the former has 2 service rating, the later has 1 service rating.

Other issues like apparent too good durability for a expendable aircraft and too good mvr for a crude control one.

What explains that drastic fall in Ki 61 MVR the weight of a 2x 20mm Ho5 vs 2x 7,7mm cannot be since even it is a small percentage of weight compared to some examples that even got armored and make it much worse than a two engine fighter

Ki 45 FB two engine MVR 21 21 21 16 11

Ki 61a 24 24 24 19 14 ...

They did lay mine with option to not lay mines on.

This can happen if you gave the minelayer orders to lay mines somewhere else but on the way it met with an enemy ship or balked at enemy aircraft being in range. When that happens the minelayer returns to base and drops its mines there and the ...

They did lay mine with option to not lay mines on.

I had 2 Japanese PBs that can have the option to lay mines- i loaded then with mines - laying mines with do not lay mines ON. the ships were not moving being just static in Rangoon hex.

If the bomber MVR has no effect then why the editors bothered editing different values for them? seems too much for cosmetic. There should be a reason B-29 have 2 MVR and a B-17 have 9.
Speculating i think there then a fixed or percentage scale down to higher altitude bands for any bomber(LB,DB,TB ...

Ok for example i don't understand why the P1Y1 have 16 mvr vs 24 mvr for the G4M, the Ginga was much more maneuverable than the G4M, same in the IJA bombers mvr of KI 21 =20 Ki 49=16 while Ki 67 a quite maneuverable bomber is only 12- What is the reason for this apparent nerfing?

Ki 67 was ...

Sorry but i have my hands already in too much pies i am just posting information to help anyone as i find it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_escort_ship_Mikura
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikura-class_escort_ship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiburi-class_escort_ship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_escort_ship_No.17
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_D_escort_ship

with DP mounts from ...

Mikura and subsequent E classes had 120mm DP guns. In game they all have naval guns only.


This might be correct, as the 120mm was an old gun and not very suited to AA (maybe vs very slow planes)..
So guess modelling it as pure naval may be ok. But i am wondering abt all these small Japanese ...