<t>You say you got the Langley out, but does it serve any purpose now that you have it? As an AV with a capacity of 0, I don't know how you could use it.<br/>
<br/>
On the one hand you could say that it should have some kind of capacity because I presume it realistically could have been used to ...

<r><QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by sulup:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s><br/>
<br/>
The only "quick" way to up your score is to bomb japanese home cities because killing civilians earns big points. 9000 civilians killed = 900 points. <e>[/b]</e></B><HR>[hr]</HR><e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>

Are you sure ...

<t>What's the deal with civilian kill points? In a PBEM game I just finished the Allied player didn't seem to be getting anywhere close to 1 point for every 10 civilians killed like it said in the book. So after the game ended I went back to a saved file from a few turns before and did and ...

<t>Elvis, are your forward bases iso-bases? If Port Moresby is under attack it may well be. That would keep routine convoys from resupplying there. You have to resupply iso-bases manually.<br/>
<br/>
Even if it isn't an iso-base, I seem to have to manually resupply some critical locations where ...

<t>Incidently, you said that if the third leadership check is passed it ups the LCU's readiness to 99. The book actually says it is upped by 50 points. That sounds right because some of LCUs in the battle I described had readiness of 72, which was presumably 22 before passing that check.<br/>
<br ...

<t>Thanks for the input Mike. I now see the desciption of the leadership check you are mentioning in the rules. As you say, that has to be what happened. When they are talking about passing a leadership check by Random 100 being less than Leadership squared, what do they mean by "Leadership", the ...

<t>Did the units in question have a retreat path? According to the book if they don't have a retreat path they may surrender, or they may just have their entrenchment level reduced.<br/>
<br/>
In our game there were some Brits in Colombo with no retreat path that didn't surrender with 80 to 1 odds ...

<t>We've had some things occurring in a PBEM game I'm playing that, based on my understanding of the game, shouldn't happen. My opponent (playing the Allies) conducted an invasion of Kitakyushu that included more than one wave of LCU/supplies landing. (That is, he had several transport TFs landing ...

<t>If you could add in those historical carriers into the oob (and they seem to be saying you can't), then you would have to eliminate the fact that sunk CVs get replaced after a year to compensate for it. You can't both get those carriers AND also get an additional replacement for the ones that are ...

<t>Ah, that makes sense. The base was a Combined Fleet base in the past and the LCUs must still be assigned to Combined Fleet.<br/>
<br/>
I had thought when you moved up the chain of command for a leader it was based on the HQ that location was assigned to, but apparently it is based on the HQ the ...

The higher HQ for 2nd Area Army is supposed to be South Army, which in turn is commanded by Imperial GHQ. But in a land battle I just had with that at a 2nd Area Army base the commanding officer for the battle was the leader of Combined Fleet. Is this a bug or is there some other explanation?

<t>When you run a turn repeatedly from the same setup, doesn't the game generate the same sequence of random numbers, and therefore, the same results?<br/>
<br/>
I seem to remember an old post where someone was complaining they ran a setup with a Pearl Harbor attack repeatedly and got virtually ...

<r><QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by Major Tom:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s>The Port Blair problem might be aided, as, I changed it to terrain 9 (max 6 airfield) and moved it South West (down the chain of islands to better represent the actual position of Port Blair in the Andaman Chain).<e>[/b]</e ...

<t>To Rich Dionne,<br/>
<br/>
Yes, I knew land based naval aircraft would do night naval attacks, but I was talking about army planes.<br/>
<br/>
It's probably not that big a deal overall. If a naval air group needs about 85 experience to try it, and army planes experience for naval attack is ...

<t>Another somewhat related subject came up in a conversation I just had. In PW, you can give army land based air squadrons naval interdiction orders, or you can give them night bombing orders, but there is no way to order them to conduct nightime naval interdiction attacks.<br/>
<br/>
Or course, an ...

<t>Hello...<br/>
<br/>
Good idea. I will talk it over with Gary and David.<br/>
<br/>
Thanks...<br/>
<br/>
Michael Wood<br/>
<br/>
This subject may have already been discussed, but I'll throw it out here for consideration just in case.<br/>
<br/>
Could there be a provision to set a limit to the ...

Do the PB4Ys act the same as other patrol aircraft in the game? That is, can they be based a "1" airbase like the flying boats can be? It seems to me, as a variant of the B-24, it should require a minimum of a "4" airbase.

Duh! I guess I should have thought of that. Thanks!

<t>Has anyone out there tabulated the new arrival dates for the aircraft in the Matrix update? They are now somewhat different that the list in the book.<br/>
<br/>
Of course, I could do it myself by running through the game turn by turn and recording when planes arrive, but I thought if someone ...

Thanks!