My friends, pre-order is the word of the day! Name the time and date. Just remember I may be cheap, but I'm not easy.

So, it's the same only different? Do you mean that this game will have some of the same features as WitP? Or a totally different game engine? It does sound good and 2x3 website is way cool!

Will this be based on the same game engine as WitP or a stand alone game (with it's own game engine)?

Sure, send me a copy to beta test for you!

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by David Heath:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s>We are working on a new expanded version right now of Operation Typhoon. More details are coming soon.... heck we should even have some screen shots.David<e>[/b]</e></B><e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>

Speaking of which, when are ...

Thanks, the edome website did work!

Paul, none of those sites have the patches. What other places can we try? Really want to play this newest game, but have no current patches.

Was unable to download the v4.2, have only the v4.0 to v4.1 patch. Have SPWaW v4.0 on disc from game magazine. Can anybody send me the v4.2 update, otherwise I have to download the whole 4.5 update. Thanks.

<t>You guys, are killing me!! -LOL- All good points, I must admit that China looks as not so foolish mistake by Japan anymore. However, I'll stick by one point, who would get involved there if they didn't have to!!<br/>
<br/>
I think emulating the real world politics of Japan is necessary (somewhat ...

<t>I know this is a Matrix site, but, the sign any game related topic.<br/>
<br/>
My topic subject is about PzC: Kharkov, does anybody play it? And, more important does anybody have real world useful advice. I'm playing the game PBEM and the combined arms penalty is killing me? Any other ideas just ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by Ed Cogburn:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s> <br/>
Well, don't forget Shanghai. It has 95 resource points in PW, so resources must have been a major reason for invading China in the first place, at least for the coastal regions.<e>[/b]</e></B><e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE ...

<t>Disagree slightly, the Japanes involvement in China in the early 30's, I would consider separate from the war started at Pearl Harbor. The actual war, or one reason, was started for resources. Especially, oil, which Japan did not have in abundance. It would be nice to include a "China" scenario ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by ChrisF:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s> <br/>
If there will be some tactical control in the game (I hope!), then a flexible time scale that could be triggered when when some key event is initiated at the strategic level (e.g. carrier battle, surface engagement ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Originally posted by GrinningDwarf:<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s> <br/>
Eagerly awaiting the opportunity to hold off the Russian Hordes!<br/>
<br/>
<e>[/b]</e></B><e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>

My panzers will grind your peasant army our treads!! LOL Do you want to play a game? New to this ...

Okay, you have a valid point. So, why not the first idea, Tac CP?

To the Rat, yes, I think "Mail Call" is okay.

<t>Has anybody been converting Squad Leader or ASL scenarios over to SPWaW. Have not checked out all of the SP websites. I could do this, but would need help in gathering the resource materials. In a fit of induced craziness I unloaded all of my boardgames. Correct me if I'm wrong, but, these ...

Some more ideas:
Call the newsletter Tac CP and the different sections of the newsletter could G-1, G-2, etc. To give it a German flair, how's about Hauptquartier? Labeling the different sections Ia, Ib, Ic, etc. How's about the grandiose title of "OKW"?

<r>Everybody who is a kid at heart, must check out website <URL url="http://www.21stcenturytoys.com"><s>[url="http://www.21stcenturytoys.com."]</s>www.21stcenturytoys.com.<e>[/url]</e></URL> I'm digging the WWII style G.I. Joe figures. Have already the 12" Eastern Front German Infantryman. Also ...

"Combat News" sounds like a winner for the newsletter. For the website "Tactical HQ" or "Tac Forward" or "FEBA" something to indicate an HQ like atmosphere.

Also, volunteering to help.

<t>All I'm saying is through no fault of the game, that fog of war is simulated by the simpleness (is that a word?) of the interface. Another words it doesn't do any of the tactical thinking for you or any of the C3 thinking. This forces as the simulated commanders to think in various dimensions ...