CHAINSAW1958 wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2026 8:45 am

Speedysteve wrote: Mon Aug 10, 2026 5:32 pm Latest update sample for 1.06.02. Turn 19. 4 bomber stream attack on Cologne and suburbs. Decoy further north. 41 bombers lost out of 964

Is the date 17 Sep 1943 plus 19 days (ie 1943 Campaign) pre FuG 220? or some other scenario ?

Yes 43 campaign start

warshipbuilder wrote: Wed Aug 12, 2026 7:34 pm 4% loss rate is fair and reasonable.

I know. I’m just reporting the data and results. Not saying it’s good or bad

Latest update sample for 1.06.02. Turn 19. 4 bomber stream attack on Cologne and suburbs. Decoy further north. 41 bombers lost out of 964

News flash people. It wasn't uncommon for the NJG to attack in pairs. One would attract the attention of the gunners and the other would hit the bomber. Now maybe the game is excessive in that regard, but it is not historically inaccurate.


I'm not involved in development or testing of the game ...

I think we all know that BC suffered some high losses on particular raids. I don't think it's up for debate that it should be possible to achieve them. I think the key thing is ensuring the game model doesn't mean high losses are achieved on any night raid regardless of what the Allies do when.

New update. 855 bomber raid on Hannover. 10 bomber losses

"... I've recently started a new Campaign as Allies vs AI on BTR. I'm only upto day 7 but I've had 1 night with almost 50 RAF bombers losses at night over Essen. ..."

Sounds like a historical result given you are flying in 20% moon light. Pretty much what happened to BC when it hit Peenemunde ...

Small update after the 1st night raid following the Hotfix. c. 750 bombers against Emden, Oldenburg and Wilhelmshaven. 28 bombers losses. NF's still attacking in pairs though which I thought the above says they wouldn't be?

Untitled.jpg

Does the "About" tab indicate 1.06.102 beta is the ...

Small update after the 1st night raid following the Hotfix. c. 750 bombers against Emden, Oldenburg and Wilhelmshaven. 28 bombers losses. NF's still attacking in pairs though which I thought the above says they wouldn't be?

Guys, I will make some adjustments to night-fighter interceptions and issue a hotfix. It won't effect your PBEM's but just make sure your opponent also install sit. Stay tuned.


Thanks for that. To confirm - it won't benefit an existing PBEM game? A new one needs to be started for it to come ...

What has been your experience playing the RAF against the Luftwaffe AI?

I'm not convinced that there is some level of skill issue with the comments I am seeing here and from others. Not that I am some great player myself, but the human player can tend to be more reckless than historical ...

Thanks. Seems you had a similar experience but with BC in BTR?

I've recently started a new Campaign as Allies vs AI on BTR. I'm only upto day 7 but I've had 1 night with almost 50 RAF bombers losses at night over Essen.

Here's an example of the losses from my last BoB PBEM turn. Doesn't seem to ...

Hi All,

I recently started a BoB 1940 PBEM campaign with me as RAF on v.1.06.101.

How have others found combat losses on this version? No matter what my opponent tries (staggering raids (all above 10K feet, Sweeps, High escort and Close escort etc) I always achieve a 3:1 or 4:1 kill ratio. The 109 ...

Thanks for that. Worked fine

Hi All,

If I start an Eagle Day PBEM game as RAF on a computer can I then carry on playing it on a different computer/laptop or does it need to be the same one I started it on?

Thanks

Hi All,

Looking for an opponent for either Wacht am Rhein or Plan Martin. Happy to play either side. Prefer historical weather and no uncertainty. Please feel free to DM me or message here if interested.

Nope not a sausage. Didn't notice any significant effects of the railyard bombing in terms of freight movement or supply transfer. Note I believe Roger only started doing this when I was using SP4 so not sure if the super powers of the Glorious Soviet Union Logistics Company outweigh any affect it ...

Morning All,

So where to begin. As Roger mentioned I decided to surrender after the last turn. The reasons for this are several and many are linked. I'll provide a bit of self analysis of how I think the game went and then some overall thoughts on WITE2.

Firstly, thank you very much Roger for ...

The last part is untrue of our game. Yes the frontline didn't vary a lot but, ironically, Loki's 1942 performance was very successful at wearing me down me without any territorial gain. I suffered over 2.3M casualties (IIRC) in 1942 alone, Loki's lines didn't move much (small pockets of a few units ...

Well....figured I'd pop in and write a short update my side. Especially since the turn I've just sent back to Loki (the one after his report above) was one of my most fun in planning and running for a while. I suspect it will also lead to a massive series of Tank Battle in response by Loki so wanted ...