Try adjusting your DPI setting lower. I have mine at 100%....GP


Setting UI scaling to 100% makes EVERYTHING tiny. So can this game handle 4K displays with reasonably sized text?


Do you have dual video cards? Try 125 DPI....

Thanks for the suggestion, but I have tested 125% as well, and ...

btd64 wrote: Fri Jan 23, 2026 9:19 pm Try adjusting your DPI setting lower. I have mine at 100%....GP

Setting UI scaling to 100% makes EVERYTHING tiny. So can this game handle 4K displays with reasonably sized text?

Hi everyone,
I recently purchased the game and while I am very interested in the depth of the simulation, I am struggling with severe UI scaling issues on a high-end 4K environment.
My System Specs:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: NVIDIA RTX 5080
RAM: 64 GB
OS: Windows 11
Display: 4K (3840x2160 ...

Found the sub, banged away with sonar and it came to the surface, time eventually ran out. Nothing else happened.

Can anyone tell me what the a/c loadout modifiers are for fuel consumption? The burn rate value in the database only gives a base value for a clean configuration. Planning is a bit tricky without it and not very realistic either.

This is a workaround, but it can hardly be the solution! I hope we get a fixed version of the file soon.

A "remastered" edition with a new front end is definitely in order (DOS is dead!). No need to redo the whole game from scratch. Replace the large bitmaps with vector gfx, so it's zoomable and smooth with no pixelation. And needs much less memory.

I didn't mean to criticize the work (far from it!) but wanted to know how this stuff works, especially when there are such huge swings in particular data.

That's why I'm asking! I'm fairly new to CMANO and I want to know what I can expect from the DB. I don't expect precise data for the most modern systems but that this particular system was off by a factor of 10 surprised me.

Apparently the DB authors did until recently! Which begs the question how reliable the DB information is.

A factor of ten is quite a bit. But by 'independent' I mean in the scientific sense, not a source of a faction that is involved in an ongoing war. If that's even possible. I don't know.

And is there any reliable source for this extraordinary claim?

<t> I agree, although I made that experience with BOA already. I don't necessarily agree on the AI, though, because it's got that whack-a-mole feel and doesn't seem to be affected by cohesion as much. But in PBEM....wow! Haven't done that in ages btw. Anyway, the game mechanics are hitting a sweet ...

This should be part of the official documentation. For both WITE and WITW.

Ah, thanks! After being away from the game for a couple of years it seems like I'm back to square one again.

What does 90/110 mean? Morale level?

<r> It didn't occur to me to utilize the zones of control in this way. What I had tried to do was to stick closer to the historical setup. That resulted in Sov divs bound for Berlin after turn 2! [X(] But now I gave a wider berth and also didn't try to close the pocket on turn 1. I guess I'm getting ...

That's easier said than done! [:(] The Soviets keep pushing me back all the time!

<t> Due to time constraints I play WITE only once in a while and stick to small scenarios. I didn't have any issues so far, but this one made me scratching my head! I can build up a line of units (Pz and mot, obviously) just west of Vyazma. I have tried a rather solid line (1_0_1_0), and even some ...

<t> Hello!<br/>
<br/>
I've tried to recreate the Vyazma pocket at the start of of Operation Typhoon (1.08 beta). I've tested both the Typhoon scenario and the Moscow 41'-42' scenario several times. In both cases I was unable to close the pocket. Instead I found my Pz corps surrounded by Soviet ...