Hi Bill,
thats´s great. Thanks a lot.
Andreas

that looks really promising. I will give it a try. Thanks a lot.

I would also prefer the double payment as with C.3 it can easily bankrupt the MP. Anyway this surrender condition (C.3) is not correct implemented as right now you only got a quater tax value each in two eco-phases which is the same as B.3.

what a nice page with much detailed information.
Worth to have a look
http://wiki.bcw-project.org/start

great News. I wish you all luck to bring that forward

in our seven Player pbem game we are still facing the Money sending bug. We are using v1.22.00.
Any ideas?

<t> Hi Bill, thanks for your answer. For the Riga case - I got it wrong and thought there are never two or more Depots allowed in one hex. For Cherbourg it is different. France placed the Depot in the City during his land Phase while Wellington´s army siege the City. The port is blockaded. During th...

for Cherbourg - the port is blockaded and the City besieged. The only French sea supply source is Toulon which is also blockeded.
for Riga - there are two Depots (one Russian and one British) in the same land hex

both cases are against the rules - as far as I understand it

<r> and this screenshot - in a blockaded port with enemy Corps it should not be allowed to place a Depot?!<br/> <br/> <IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/14707/E70F73DF424D478297D6D7299493D9C0.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/14707/E70F73DF424D47...

<r> we are runing a seven Player PBEM game v.1.22.00 (David, Brian, Steve, Mitch, Mark, Lew, myself)<br/> There is an issue with the Depot creation in friendly ports. Attached the screenshot - that shouldn´t be possible as far as what I got from the manual.<br/> <br/> <br/> <IMG src="https://www.mat...

with the Version 1.22.00 the naval transportation of artillery is possible at the cost of two heavy ships (like cavalry). Anyway I tried to find any word in the rules about this and found nothing. It would be nice to add a line concerning this.

great to hear any Progress. Thanks Bill.
Did David told you about our river crossing issue?

cheers
Andreas

Hi Bill,
that´s great.
FYI - we (our 7 Player PBEM Group) have just installed the v1.22.00 Beta to give it a try.
We are in June 1806 and will have shortly some Money Transfer coming. I will Keep you updated.
Andreas

great idea David - everything what make it easier is welcomed and it seems not much work to implement it.
... and I will do my very best not to Forget to set the right Settings

cheers
Andreas

thanks Bill for your quick Response.
We are using the official v1.21.04 for our PBEM game (David W. and Brian C.) are Players and I am host.
We think about to uügrade to v1.22.00 beta. Do you plan an official release shortly?

thanks a lot - that sounds really good

<t> ah - I forgot to mention that the Corps size of the minors within the alternate EiA Scenario are not equal to the tables. e.g. Persia have only two Corps <br/> The order of battle on the yahoo page for Persia has:-<br/> <br/> 3 Inf Corps with 10 Inf each (morale 2.0)<br/> 2 Cav corps with 10 Cav...

<t> we are running a seven Player PBEM game using the alternate EiH Scenario just finishing the March 1806 eco Phase.<br/> Everything is fine so far. We discovered some minor issues:<br/> the loan Money bug between MP´s is still there<br/> a loan unit bug -> cossack unit loaned to Austria is after c...

<t> Hi Bill,<br/> thanks a lot for doing all this work.<br/> We (a seven Player PBEM game) using the latest Version v1.21.04 and enjoying the stable gameplay so far. As we are in the June eco turn 1805 we have not much to Report but one issue just popped up - the loaning Money bug. The MP can send M...

<t> I´playing the Royalists in a full scale PBEM campaign. We are at turn 30 and there is no Chance of buying any supply Train from the army rooster. After creating two Depots I have only one supply Train left and can´t move any bigger army without loosing my men.<br/> Is this a bug or have I mistak...