Ok thanks and noted

<r> <br/>
WITE is patched to 1.07.07, this is the Lost Battles expansion, Stalingrad to Berlin campaign. <br/>
Screenie shows the Soviet 395 Rifle Division retreating ... note I attacked it after ONE turn cut off from supply, so it should surrender. <br/>
<br/>
The 'destroyed units' screen does ...

<t> Hey Panther,&nbsp;<br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
Ok I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for "frakkin", but I honestly thought the character in question was actually an eight-year-old who randomly blundered into the wrong website/forum, then I realized it's not his chronological age that's the issue, it ...

<t> Hmm... it's not just his "talking points" that are superfluous and irksome...&nbsp;his spelling is simply out of this world. <br/>
There's like an error every five words or so. <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
Certainly, I've never seen "freaking" misspelled before, and certainly not as "frakkin" . Dude, a ...

<t> YH<br/>
I hear you on the Tojo/Tony and Frank. But what about the Ki-61-IIKAIb ? Is this worth building, even though it's available (in CHS) in Jan 1944, just 4 months before the Frank. The stats look good enough. <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
On a related note, since my knowledge of Japan's WWII ...

<r> In CHS the Ki-61-IIKAIb becomes available in Jan 1944. The stats of this (improved Tony?) plane are much better than the original Tony especially the gun value of 16. <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
In fact,&nbsp;its&nbsp;stats seem&nbsp;almost comparable to the Frank&nbsp;which becomes available in May ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: ctangus<br/>
You can check it in the database editor, but Adv. Mit start producing in 12/42 and Adv. Nak. start producing in 9/43.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Thanks ctangus. I'm using CHS and according to the aircraft replacement pools screen, the N1K1 ...

I know, but I don't know his username here unfortunately. Our PBEM started with an acceptance email direct to my email ...

<r> Sorry for posting this here, but I'm having trouble replying your turn and I don't have any other way of contacting you. <br/>
<br/>
This is the message I keep getting ... <br/>
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification<br/>
Delivery to the following recipient failed ...

Reg
I understand the situation waaay better now [:)]
Much obliged.

<t> Reg,<br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
Ok, but I'm still a little confused. Japan starts with 2 factories in Kanazawa producing Adv Mit and Adv Nak engines. There seems to be NO way to switch to either Toyoda or Nissan. <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
Am I correct in assuming that Jacks and Georges use Adv Mit and Adv Nak ...

<t> In CHS, when I hit 'i' to see aircraft replacements, I see that Jack uses Nissan and George uses Toyoda engines. <br/>
<br/>
When I hit 'D' to access the main aircraft database, Jack uses Adv Mit and George uses Adv Nak engines. <br/>
<br/>
Does Nissan = Adv Mit and Toyoda = Adv Nak then ...

Yeah I tried that and it helped some but I'm still puzzled why TF 2 doesn't seem to want to unload any fuel into an undamaged size 1 port. Ah well...

Yeah it's weird. I know size 1 ports are pretty slow at unloading, but after 2-3 turns and still ZERO fuel has been unloaded ... really weird.

Yes I was referring to the second instance, Mike. I have TF 1 with capital ships low on fuel and TF 2 is a non-replenishment TF with tankers loaded up with fuel. So I still have to get TF 2 to unload fuel at a port so TF 1 can head to said port and refuel right?

Well, one of my important TFs is low on fuel, and I don't have a replenishment TF at hand ... so I don't have a choice. It's the tankers unloading there or nothing &nbsp;

Yes the TF is set to unload. Definitely

<t> This is CHS 2.08, scen 155 with Andrew's extended map. <br/>
<br/>
I have a transport TF with about 6 tankers. Target and DH are Port Moresby and it's set to unload cargo. It has about 55000 fuel but even after 3 turns, nothing has unloaded. The port is NOT damaged at all (0%) and I even tried ...

Can take one more Allied opponent. If the houserules&nbsp;are acceptable, please email me at rybeck506@gmail.com.

<t> Hi <br/>
<br/>
Have a couple other PBEMs going (these are my first), I can take one more opponent. Would prefer an Allied opponent with no more than 4-6 PBEM games under his belt. <br/>
<br/>
Would like to try v 1.806, Andrew's CHS 2.08 scenario 155 with the extended map (v 6.3). <br/>
<br ...