2.42B revisited

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

User avatar
decaro
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:05 pm
Location: Stratford, Connecticut
Contact:

2.42B revisited

Post by decaro »

Has anyone lately had any success going from 2.4-2.41-2.42B w/o any planes or pilots missing?

Or do we all stay at 2.3 -- or invest in "War in the Pacific"?
Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.[center]Image[/center]
[center]"The Angel of Okinawa"[/center]
Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Miller »

I think 2.42b is the end of the line for UV patches (lets give Matrix credit for releasing it three years after game launch!).

I think the missing aircraft bug only effects certain scenarios - present in Scn 17 but have had no problems in a Scn 19 game.

2.30 is probably the best patch to stick with overall.......
TAIL GUNNER
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:10 am
Location: Los Osos, CA

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by TAIL GUNNER »

ORIGINAL: Joe D.

Has anyone lately had any success going from 2.4-2.41-2.42B w/o any planes or pilots missing?

Or do we all stay at 2.3 -- or invest in "War in the Pacific"?

Hmmm.....you just made me realize that Matrix has been playing us!
(By "us" I mean the last few UV diehards that don't have WitP yet....[8D])

Matrix knowingly broke UV so we'd get disgusted with it and buy WitP!!!!

Well........it worked....

WitP is on the top of my Christmas list![8D]

Nice strategy Matrix!!!!
"If you want peace, prepare for war."
User avatar
DEB
Posts: 691
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol , England

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by DEB »

It was my understanding that 2.42B was a test release for us poor souls to play and report our findings. This it pointless unless an eventual 2.42 or 2.43 is produced. Others have sugguested that WitP also has similar errors in it as those remaining in UV 2.42B ( same game engine since 2.40
therefore the same errors ? )so don't expect that to be any better ! Hopefully both will get sorted out in the fullness of time. [>:]

Matrix it appears do not have enough staff to deal with these problems directly, but rely on people to deal with things in any spare time they can conjure up. They do however have enough capacity to create a news-letter & editor ! [:(]
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by LoBaron »

ORIGINAL: Juggalo

Hmmm.....you just made me realize that Matrix has been playing us!
(By "us" I mean the last few UV diehards that don't have WitP yet....[8D])

Matrix knowingly broke UV so we'd get disgusted with it and buy WitP!!!!

Well........it worked....

WitP is on the top of my Christmas list![8D]

Nice strategy Matrix!!!!

well i belong to one of these "forcefully converted"... [:D]
i still have an UV PBEM game running but most of my time goes to getting a grasp of WitP. the difference is such that after a couple of turns in the game you start to realize what "grand strategy" really means. looking at UV it now seems to me like a training place to prevent getting totally lost in WitP... [X(]

i can only encourage you to buy it. after a few "oh man! i thought UV was complex...." it turns out to be the best strategy game ive ever played. too bad gary grisby said he doesnt want to continue developing games of this scale in the near future.
Image
User avatar
Mike Wood
Posts: 1424
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Oakland, California
Contact:

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Mike Wood »

Hello...

Be advised that the skill set for patching game executables and writing a news letter are some what different. We have a shortage of folks with the former, not the latter. Have been working on patches for UV, WIP, SPWAW and trying to code War in the East.

Plan "to deal with things in any spare time can conjure up", this weekend. Going to try and fix the vanishing aircraft bug.

Wish me well on this effort...

Michael Wood

ORIGINAL: DEB

It was my understanding that 2.42B was a test release for us poor souls to play and report our findings. This it pointless unless an eventual 2.42 or 2.43 is produced. Others have sugguested that WitP also has similar errors in it as those remaining in UV 2.42B ( same game engine since 2.40
therefore the same errors ? )so don't expect that to be any better ! Hopefully both will get sorted out in the fullness of time. [>:]

Matrix it appears do not have enough staff to deal with these problems directly, but rely on people to deal with things in any spare time they can conjure up. They do however have enough capacity to create a news-letter & editor ! [:(]


P_DEX
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:29 pm

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by P_DEX »

Well, I'm wishing you luck! Been wanting to get back in to UV for some time now...just patiently waiting for a 2.42 patch outcome.

And though I'm not much of a poster, I do stalk the UV forums a bit. :)
User avatar
Skyfire7631
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Skyfire7631 »

Ditto [:)]

Regards.
Forwarn45
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:53 am

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Forwarn45 »

Sounds great! I've been enjoying this game (and still kind of learning) since getting it a month or two ago.
User avatar
DEB
Posts: 691
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol , England

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by DEB »

Thanks for the reply Mr Wood. I was begining to wonder if the forums got read at all ( although I do realise you can't comment on all posts ). I do realise that the skills set is somewhat different, but then if your "office" is anything like mine Newsletters are usually done by someone " in house"
( as a spare time task ). Not knowing most of the Matrix staff's identities , I don't know if the chap doing the newsletter was a) specially employed for the job from the outside, b) transferred to it from inside or c) had taken it on in addition the usual tasks ( which may or may not have included patching games etc.).

Good luck with your efforts in curing "our " game problems.[;)]
User avatar
CatLord
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 1:35 pm
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Contact:

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by CatLord »

Good luck Mike !

Cat
Member of the Revolution Under Siege development team.
Temple
Posts: 529
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 8:21 pm

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Temple »

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

Be advised that the skill set for patching game executables and writing a news letter are some what different. We have a shortage of folks with the former, not the latter. Have been working on patches for UV, WIP, SPWAW and trying to code War in the East.

Plan "to deal with things in any spare time can conjure up", this weekend. Going to try and fix the vanishing aircraft bug.

Wish me well on this effort...

Michael Wood

ORIGINAL: DEB

It was my understanding that 2.42B was a test release for us poor souls to play and report our findings. This it pointless unless an eventual 2.42 or 2.43 is produced. Others have sugguested that WitP also has similar errors in it as those remaining in UV 2.42B ( same game engine since 2.40
therefore the same errors ? )so don't expect that to be any better ! Hopefully both will get sorted out in the fullness of time. [>:]

Matrix it appears do not have enough staff to deal with these problems directly, but rely on people to deal with things in any spare time they can conjure up. They do however have enough capacity to create a news-letter & editor ! [:(]




Mike, I've been stopping by the the UV/WiTP/WPO forums checking on patch status prior to the holidays. Just to let you know I appreciate that you are trying to squash this bug [:)]. If a patch isn't going to be issued and I get a hankering for a game of UV over the holidays, should I roll back to the latest official which is 2.41, or as someone suggested, go back to 2.30? Or maybe stick with the 2.42 beta?

Thanks for your time.
User avatar
Skyfire7631
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Skyfire7631 »

Bump !

Any news from that last patch ? [:(]

Please, pretty please ! [:)]

Regards.
User avatar
GoofTrooper
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:35 pm
Location: USA

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by GoofTrooper »

Any news would be nice. I think I play UV more then WITP (smaller scale) and would like some info about the status of the patch.
Image
P_DEX
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:29 pm

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by P_DEX »

*tap tap*

This thing on?

Patch news needed....CD getting dustier...cravings to play latest version increasing... yadda, yadda
User avatar
DEB
Posts: 691
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol , England

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by DEB »

Go back to sleep chaps-not much chance of prompting a reply from Matrix - let alone a Patch.
User avatar
Mike Wood
Posts: 1424
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Oakland, California
Contact:

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Mike Wood »

Hello...

No news yet, on patch.

Bye...

Michael Wood
ORIGINAL: DEB

Go back to sleep chaps-not much chance of prompting a reply from Matrix - let alone a Patch.
User avatar
DEB
Posts: 691
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol , England

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by DEB »

I stand corrected. [X(]

( On the reply front anyway. ) [:'(]

I'll go back to sleep now.

[>:]
TAIL GUNNER
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:10 am
Location: Los Osos, CA

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by TAIL GUNNER »

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

No news yet, on patch.

Bye...

Michael Wood

I guess some news about no news is better than no news about no news...





or something....
"If you want peace, prepare for war."
User avatar
Skyfire7631
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Skyfire7631 »

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

No news yet, on patch.

Bye...

Michael Wood

Fair enough, I understand UV is a rather old game now and is not on top of the priorities list [:)]

The question is, though (and I know you saw it coming [;)]) : when ?

Regards.

Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”