New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Nikademus »

Those that actually play it at least. [;)]
Ideologue
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:33 am

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Ideologue »

ORIGINAL: Berkut

I was pretty sure you wouldn't be able to pay me though...

Man, it didn't used to be about the money.

Oh, wait, yeah it did.[:D]
User avatar
wworld7
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:57 am
Location: The Nutmeg State

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by wworld7 »

Three cheers...I'll drink to this news...
Flipper
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by dtravel »

Welcome to the funny farm to Don Bowen and Joe Wilkerson and best wishes. Just try not to take us naysayers too personally. Blood pressure medication is too expensive. [:'(]
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
Big B
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Big B »

WOW!!

Congratulations Joe Wilkerson and Don Bowen!![&o][&o]

I have hope things will get even better!! [8D]
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8241
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by jwilkerson »

Greetings all,

Some things to keep in mind. Because we don't want to get distracted by launching new initiatives until we've got the 1.8 patch in hand, we will not be focusing on new development activities initially. However, once we have 1.8 released, then we will be interacting with the forum more to determine what is next. As soon as Don and I have taken care of some logistical matters to get us up and running, we will be estimating a timeframe for 1.8 and we will get that to you, I expect that estimate to be done in about a week.

Also, I have gone through ( manually ) the WITP Wish list thread and pulled the data from the first 400 or so items, in that list. There are a number of duplicates, but not too many. But I would say that the wish list is still a useful place to record suggestions.

Thanks for the "greetings" and know that Don and I are excited to be joining the team and for the opportunity to try to take WITP in directions that will be good for all of us.


Joe
[:)]

WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
juliet7bravo
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 8:00 am

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by juliet7bravo »

ORIGINAL: rroberson

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

ORIGINAL: rroberson

Don't hold back Juliet...how do you really feel?[:D]

Didn't take long....did it? [;)]

Yeah its kinda sad actually. I simply dont get the hatefulness of some of the people there. I chalk it up to passion for the game, which is a good thing. I guess.

More like brutal honesty from a paying customer. A little more honest input and a lot less butt-nuzzling right from the start and maybe we wouldn't be talking "WitP II". If this was an accident victim (instead of a train wreck), it'd look like a mummy from all the layers of bandaids applied trying to stop arterial bleeding.

I'll buy WitP II...maybe a year after its release. If the game designs been thought through. If my leaders don't dissappear. If land combat works. If air combat works. If the log system works. If you can play without an inch thick list of self-imposed "house rules" ect.

And no...I don't play this game, and destroyed the disk in case I was ever tempted to re-install it for the umpteenth time.

Good by again till next year or so...back to looking at the pictures.
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: Reiryc

Fantastic news about a possible enhancement or even better, WiTP II...

Please take my money now. [;)]
I'd be happy to. [:'(]
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Halsey »

If you need a ground combat expert,
I would recommend "Irrelevant".

He seems to be among the few who actually understands it's workings.[;)]
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Halsey »

ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk

Great news. I can see Halsey coming back from limbo right now.

[:D][:D][:D]
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by mdiehl »

Why does the name "Don Bowen" really sound familiar to me? Some association with old 3W or GDW or Avalon Hill maybe?
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
User avatar
Bulldog61
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Aurora,CO

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Bulldog61 »

This is really great welcome aboad guys!
You can run but you'll die tired!
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7187
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Feinder »

A little more honest input and a lot less butt-nuzzling

Are you kidding?!

Honesty is way over-rated. Butt nuzzling all the way.

Oh wait. We're not talking about that.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
Demosthenes
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Demosthenes »

ORIGINAL: mdiehl

Why does the name "Don Bowen" really sound familiar to me? Some association with old 3W or GDW or Avalon Hill maybe?

Not sure, but I believe Don Bowen has been with CHS for some time...maybe that's where you heard the name..
User avatar
Demosthenes
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Demosthenes »

ORIGINAL: Feinder
A little more honest input and a lot less butt-nuzzling

Are you kidding?!

Honesty is way over-rated. Butt nuzzling all the way.

Oh wait. We're not talking about that.

-F-
[:D][:D][:-]
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: mdiehl

Why does the name "Don Bowen" really sound familiar to me? Some association with old 3W or GDW or Avalon Hill maybe?

I used to contribute to work on PacWar - mainly the early editors. If you are thinking of anything else - I am sure that I have an alibi for that day.
rroberson
Posts: 2057
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 7:53 am
Location: Arizona
Contact:

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by rroberson »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

ORIGINAL: mdiehl

Why does the name "Don Bowen" really sound familiar to me? Some association with old 3W or GDW or Avalon Hill maybe?

I used to contribute to work on PacWar - mainly the early editors. If you are thinking of anything else - I am sure that I have an alibi for that day.

lol
Image
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by mdiehl »

[:D]

No sweat man. I have this vague memory of "Bowen" written artiste sig on old Avalon Hill cover art. Wondered if there was some conxtion.
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
Ursa MAior
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:10 am
Location: Hungary, EU

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by Ursa MAior »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

Those that actually play it at least. [;)]

Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood point Nik!!

Welcome sir aboard! Please don take us too seriously we just want to be Nimitz's or Yamamoto's shoes sooooooooo badly.
Image
Art by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
BossGnome
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:13 am
Location: Canada

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

Post by BossGnome »

WITP 2? What the hell would there be left to improve upon after patch 1.8? If everything works as planned, I really don't see how they could make the game more complete... Graphics...maybe??
"Hard pressed on my right; my left is in retreat. My center is yielding. Impossible to maneuver. Situation excellent. I am attacking."
-Gen. Joffre, before the battle of the Marne
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”