Anyone working on user scenarios?

Norm Koger's The Operational Art of War III is the next game in the award-winning Operational Art of War game series. TOAW3 is updated and enhanced version of the TOAW: Century of Warfare game series. TOAW3 is a turn based game covering operational warfare from 1850-2015. Game scale is from 2.5km to 50km and half day to full week turns. TOAW3 scenarios have been designed by over 70 designers and included over 130 scenarios. TOAW3 comes complete with a full game editor.

Moderators: JAMiAM, ralphtricky

User avatar
GJK
Posts: 542
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 3:37 am
Contact:

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by GJK »

I'm trying to work on my first ever scenario for TOAW-ACOW; "Texas Revolution" based on the old boardgame by Mings from a number of years ago (see my VASSAL module of it HERE).

However, I can't work on the forces, I keep getting a "not enough system resources" message and I'll get that when trying to load my map unless I shut down everything. I suspect that this is a known compatability issue with Win2k/XP and I'm trying to find out if there's a patch or fix for this - if anybody has any suggestions? I can't believe that a gig of RAM isn't enough for a game that came out when it did.
"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son."

-Dean Vernon Wormer
User avatar
ralphtricky
Posts: 6675
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:05 am
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by ralphtricky »

ORIGINAL: GJK

I'm trying to work on my first ever scenario for TOAW-ACOW; "Texas Revolution" based on the old boardgame by Mings from a number of years ago (see my VASSAL module of it HERE).

However, I can't work on the forces, I keep getting a "not enough system resources" message and I'll get that when trying to load my map unless I shut down everything. I suspect that this is a known compatability issue with Win2k/XP and I'm trying to find out if there's a patch or fix for this - if anybody has any suggestions? I can't believe that a gig of RAM isn't enough for a game that came out when it did.
The issue isn't RAM, it's that every individual picture is loaded into something called the GDI when you're playing, which is still limited to 64K. I've made some tweaks to TOAW 3 so that its better than TOAW COW, although you stil can't run more that 3-4 copies. Down the road, I'm going to look into putting the graphics into regular memory unless you're drawing. It's going to be a little slower, but machine speeds have increased enough that it shouldn't be noticeable.


Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.
User avatar
GJK
Posts: 542
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 3:37 am
Contact:

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by GJK »

I'd like to be able to run just one copy that allows me to save my forces while in the editor! [:)]

Thanks, I'm looking forward to the updated release.

In the meantime, if anybody is interested in the map for Texas Revolution, I've uploaded it HERE. I have the OOB's and unit info from the original game if somebody is interested in picking up the pieces and finishing this up. [&o]

Original game map:
Image

TOAW version:
Image
"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son."

-Dean Vernon Wormer
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by golden delicious »

As long as we're posting screenshots;

Image

Rhodes etc., 1943.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
Telumar
Posts: 2210
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:43 am

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by Telumar »

Nice, Ben...guess it was not easy to create these notes on the upper right corner so that they look like a continued text... [:)]
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by golden delicious »

ORIGINAL: Telumar

Nice, Ben...guess it was not easy to create these notes on the upper right corner so that they look like a continued text... [:)]

You're not kidding. But with quite a substantial briefing, having the key house rules on the map makes the game so much easier to play.

For comparison, the same area in google maps;
http://maps.google.com/?ll=36.286349,27 ... 9&t=k&om=1
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
*Lava*
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: On the Beach

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by *Lava* »

Luv the screens.. keep'em coming!

BTW, has anybody ever put together a map archive?

Ray (alias Lava)
User avatar
sstevens06
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 3:12 pm
Location: USA

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by sstevens06 »

ORIGINAL: golden delicious

As long as we're posting screenshots;

...

Rhodes etc., 1943.


Nice job. Did you use ODD to create it?
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by golden delicious »

ORIGINAL: sstevens06

Nice job. Did you use ODD to create it?

Yeah.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
User avatar
BillLottJr
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 10:08 pm

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by BillLottJr »

Is this for the 1943 invasion of Rhodes that Churchill wanted to do?
Romani ite domum!
User avatar
Telumar
Posts: 2210
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:43 am

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by Telumar »

ORIGINAL: golden delicious
You're not kidding. But with quite a substantial briefing, having the key house rules on the map makes the game so much easier to play.

A pretty good idea indeed.
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4121
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by golden delicious »

ORIGINAL: Bill II

Is this for the 1943 invasion of Rhodes that Churchill wanted to do?

Yeah. As with several operations that never happened, everyone was good to go, then the shipping was needed for something else, things were postponed and then cancelled.

The operation could have given the Germans yet another headache by make him increase Greek garrisons, made it easier to strike at Ploesti, and potentially affected the attitude of Turkey.

The Germans get more or less the same reinforcements they used for Leros, with a few extra bits and bobs.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Williamb
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Dayton Ohio

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by Williamb »

I hope to eventually sit down and alter the Korean War scenario.

Want to scale it down to battalion level (Regimental for Chinese) so will need to alter the map and scale for the scenario to function properly.

Wil take time. hardest part I had with old version was editing events.

Hopefully that will be easier to do with this new version
Image
User avatar
rhinobones
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by rhinobones »

ORIGINAL: William Amos

I hope to eventually sit down and alter the Korean War scenario. Want to scale it down to battalion level (Regimental for Chinese) so will need to alter the map and scale for the scenario to function properly.

There are a couple of authors who have made 1905 Russo-Japanese War scenarios some of which would be suitable (updated to 1950 of course) for your project. Suggest that you contact the authors and request permission to use their work.

Regards, RhinoBones
Colin Wright:
Pre Combat Air Strikes # 64 . . . I need have no concern about keeping it civil

Post by broccolini » Sun Nov 06, 2022
. . . no-one needs apologize for douchebags acting like douchebags
User avatar
rhinobones
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by rhinobones »

ORIGINAL: Central Blue

Rhino...

I'll be on full kid duty during your trip . . .

I reccomend The Ramp for a Bloody Mary hangover cure. Not that I've had the need since we started having kids. [;)]

Golden Boy Pizza and The Bohemian Cigar Store in North Beach used to still be authentic when me and the missus were still in the mix. Lower Clement Street is like China Town without the hype. Chestnut Street and Union Street if you want to meet yuppies -- or whatever they are called these days. Never buy coffee at a Starbucks. Go to Peets or one of the independents.They were roasting coffee in Frisco when Seattle was a howling wilderness.

Blue

Appreciate the tips. I may very well need a Bloddy Mary although, I am also old enough to know better. But who cares!

Regards, RhinoBones


Colin Wright:
Pre Combat Air Strikes # 64 . . . I need have no concern about keeping it civil

Post by broccolini » Sun Nov 06, 2022
. . . no-one needs apologize for douchebags acting like douchebags
Central Blue
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 5:31 pm

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by Central Blue »

Rhino...

I forgot to mention that the Ramp has a nice view of a big, old, dry-dock. Not much waterfront left in Frisco, but there's a piece right there.

In other news... I reworked my map with the ODD utility. I used National Geographics online maps, Michelin, and an old Goodes Atlas, plus some nice stuff from a website dedicated to the 1/33 of the 3rd.

As soon as I don't have to work, I'll be getting back to tweaking the OOB and TOE's. I've decided to add the French II Corps to defend the west side of the Rhine only. Then all this work and family stuff came up...
USS St. Louis firing on Guam, July 1944. The Cardinals and Browns faced each other in the World Series that year
Image
User avatar
a white rabbit
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: ..under deconstruction..6N124E..

RE: Anyone working on user scenarios?

Post by a white rabbit »

ORIGINAL: ralphtrick
ORIGINAL: rhinobones

After reading all the comments and suggestions for TOAW 3 it is obvious, as Ralph has pointed out and responded to, a good number of people want scenarios designed for play against the PO. I have a design for a scenario designed to be played against AOwPI (pronounced “Oh’pee”) which stands for Artificial Opponent with Programmed Intelligence. It is an Earthling (human) against AOwPI; a challenging scenario against AOwPI which can be played in an evening when your PBM mates have let you down, or when you just feel like something different.
Awesome, let me know if you need help understanding why 'Elmer' does some things that he does. Also, let me know what I need to look into putting into the next release for 'Elmer' I have some ideas, but I'm always open to other ideas.

Ralph

..more formation objectives, grouped early, middle and late scen

..and Elmer-gets-to-play too, ....elephants mmmm ?
..toodA, irmAb moAs'lyB 'exper'mentin'..,..beàn'tus all..?,
Post Reply

Return to “Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III”