Release 3: In Development.

Post bug reports, ask for tech support and general requests for help with getting Maximum-Football working in this forum. This is for official support on official versions. Reports based on public beta versions should go in the Public Beta forum.

Moderator: David Winter

nmleague
Posts: 2361
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:04 am

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by nmleague »

The fast sim option, the stats from the current fast sim option are not workable.
JonnieR
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:50 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by JonnieR »

1. Sim option
2. Depth Chart (I know its not a choice, but it might be easy, who knows)
3. I'd keep the new graphics for the next Release of the Game itself ( just a thought)
User avatar
David Winter
Posts: 5158
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Contact:

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by David Winter »

I'll leave this post up here for the duration of the 3rd development cycle so everyone will get a chance to have their say.

Results so far as surprising. I would have put money on Online H2H being the overwhelming choice..
"They're not dolls. They're action figures. Valuable Action figures!"
Gman1025
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:46 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by Gman1025 »

sim option
depth chart (I am with everyone on the depth chart)
jkntech
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 7:51 pm
Contact:

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by jkntech »

Sim option on this side would be nice.
MjH
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:56 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by MjH »

Here's how I would prioritize the options:

1) True depth chart (another write-in vote!)
2) Additional simulation mode
3) Financial system
4) New interface design
5) New 3D engine
6) Online H2H play

and it wouldn't bother me if 5 and 6 didn't happen. [:)]
DirkGildun
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:31 am

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by DirkGildun »

My choices would be:

1) The additional sim engine
2) The depth chart

I don't care at all about the financial stuff or H2H. I can live with the existing 3D engine and interface.
Lions
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:53 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Contact:

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by Lions »

Hi David,

My top 3 choices are

1. GM
2. Sim
3. H2H
Sladebuck
midwave
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:40 pm
Contact:

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by midwave »

I would choose New 3D engine, with hopefully the possibility of running the game in a window, if possible.
GlennN
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:50 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by GlennN »

1) Additional sim option (I agree with others here that without accurate stats, nothing else will matter).

2) GM features (more trade than financial - I would turn off a salary cap anyway [please make that an option if/when a cap is added])

I have no interest in H2H, so I don't care if that is ever added.
Murburto
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:13 am
Location: The Wire, MD

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by Murburto »

If I had a vote I would say:

1)Sim with accurate stats
2) GM mode is needed with somekind of financial system involved.
3) New graphics is not needed, but would be nice.
3)H2H- I could care less.



Never has so few, given so much, to so many.
scottGreene
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:04 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by scottGreene »

Jot me down for the additional SIM OPTION.
kshinner
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Livonia, MI

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by kshinner »

For me:

1) Additional Sim mode. That's a "gotta have". For all the customization, you can't predict what a user is going to do with his league. If he's replicating his hometown pee-wee league with little to no passing, this is the only way to get the results of the other games in the league to match the ones he plays out.

2) New 3D and/or open it up to user mods more. With all the activity in the Graphics Related forum, you can see that what the game looks like does matter.

3) Financial system. Third party mods can address this so I don't see it as a priority to do in-game.

4) Interface.

5) H2H. Personally, I don't plan on playing that way.
"We got our own ammuninition - it's filled with paint. When we fire it...it makes pretty pictures - scares the hell outta people." - Oddball
Guderon
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: Arizona

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by Guderon »

Here's my vote for a more accurate sim mode. And if you do put in a financial model, PLEASE make it optional. I hate dealing with contracts, salaries, etc.
Sonny
Posts: 2005
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 9:51 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by Sonny »

H2H
Quote from Snigbert -

"If you mess with the historical accuracy, you're going to have ahistorical outcomes."

"I'll say it again for Sonny's sake: If you mess with historical accuracy, you're going to have
ahistorical outcomes. "
redfox000
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:14 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by redfox000 »

I vote for the financial system.
User avatar
Jay_the_MaxFB_Fan
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:26 am
Contact:

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by Jay_the_MaxFB_Fan »

H2H please!! [:D]
"Give Us This Day Our Daily Football Pro"

http://www.webfreaksfootballleague.com
User avatar
Tbird
Posts: 683
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:28 am
Contact:

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by Tbird »

The Sim option is my choice because I think it would be great for leagues and it gives you a chance to use your playboo.

Calculated results are for Text sims. The way fbpro simmed out games is the way to go and with game film is possible [:)]

second would be head 2 head because that too would bring in more people who want to start H2H leagues but I would also want it to be available in quick play so I can kick my friend's ass [:D]

I don't care for a financial model maybe just the ability to trade players that's about it.
BryanS1017
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:57 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by BryanS1017 »

2) GM mode is needed with somekind of financial system involved.
3) New graphics is not needed, but would be nice.

If there were to be some sort of financial system added, please make it as an option. I personally don't care for them because they are to much time intensive and for the most part plays no real part in making the teams more competitive.

Graphis to me look fine though they could be tweaked a tad to make them less choppy and more reaslistic.
BryanS1017
darrellb9
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:34 pm

RE: Release 3: In Development.

Post by darrellb9 »

I vote:

1) GM features.
2) SIM

Really don't care about H2H or improved 3D. Bought this game hoping it was the Puresim Baseball equivalent for football [:)] Hope 3rd release fixes stats issues as I can't get more than 2 or 3 games into a season before having to reset due to major inaccuracies. I'm optimistic it'll eventually get there. There's been steady improvement so far. Keep up the good work guys! Incidentally, your responsiveness on the boards is pretty amazing in this day and age [&o].

Post Reply

Return to “Maximum-Football Support”