ORIGINAL: Pippin
Looking at the economic manipulation, I would say your group is VERY conservative.
We discussed this remark on the last game and are not really sure of the meaning it had.
Can you explain what you mean please?
Moderator: MOD_EIA
ORIGINAL: Pippin
Looking at the economic manipulation, I would say your group is VERY conservative.
ORIGINAL: Grand_Armee
I love it when somebody else laminates their entire EIA map. My game trebled in weight due to the lovely plastic.


ORIGINAL: Hoche
The Austrian should place 6 corps under the command of Mack in the mnts n of Leopoldstadt and leave 1m "blocking" corps in Krakow and Olmutz. Mack would have the advantage of the mnt bonus for defense if attacked and since it is in Hungary he could also pop up the the Insurection corps. (That's an extra 30m & 6c). With the blocking corps Suvarov can't make and end run for Vienna. Suvarov has only two choices, he can either attack Mack in the mnts or move off to the west of Mack and strike at Vienna. The move on Vienna would force Mack to leave his mountain position. However, if Suvarov does choose to move past Mack then his supply line is danergously exposed. This would force him to either abandon the move on Vienna or leave several corps back to defend the supply line.
Thanks for the info. I chose Hoche as my name for this forum because when I signed up for this forum I was playing 1792 France and crushing everybody with him at the head of my armies. It was a lot of fun. [:D]ORIGINAL: vincentf
ORIGINAL: Hoche
The Austrian should place 6 corps under the command of Mack in the mnts n of Leopoldstadt and leave 1m "blocking" corps in Krakow and Olmutz. Mack would have the advantage of the mnt bonus for defense if attacked and since it is in Hungary he could also pop up the the Insurection corps. (That's an extra 30m & 6c). With the blocking corps Suvarov can't make and end run for Vienna. Suvarov has only two choices, he can either attack Mack in the mnts or move off to the west of Mack and strike at Vienna. The move on Vienna would force Mack to leave his mountain position. However, if Suvarov does choose to move past Mack then his supply line is danergously exposed. This would force him to either abandon the move on Vienna or leave several corps back to defend the supply line.
Thank you. I am the Austrian Kaiser and my Mack did something like this, but I do note some details I haven't thougth about.
Hi Hoche. When I was in France, in Versailles, my appartements was at a few steps from the house where Lazare Hoche was born. It is now a good restaurant, named Chez Lazare! [;)]





ORIGINAL: Murat
I can't find my 1792 rules but I am almost certain (I have been wrong before, just search these forums and see) that France needs to reclaim 6 of the 7 listed areas to get dominance, but will not lose it until she fails to control 2. Since Austria clearly controls 3, France would seem to be non-dominant (sorry Nappy if I am right, but you really need to repress the Austrian Empire).
*edited for this*
Thank you by the way for doing this, I do not have 6 other friends to play this with like I did back in college so it is nice to live vicariously [:)]

