FILE SET RHS 2.23 Released [Minor update]

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

FILE SET RHS 2.23 Released [Minor update]

Post by el cid again »

RHSCVO v 2.12 is now uploaded to Cobra and testers.

It should be available from download sites fairly soon - and from Cobra - it should be daytime in Australia.

The Russian active variation is also now available.

The ship file is BIG - and I just fixed about 4000 lines of it. I want an application for an olympic typing contest.
User avatar
Mifune
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Florida

RE: CORRUPTED FILE SET RHS 2.10

Post by Mifune »

"Whirraway traded in its bombs for a whopping 16 inch one" Can I be the first Whirraway Fanboy once one of those 16 inch squadrons are deployed?[:D]
Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: CORRUPTED FILE SET RHS 2.10

Post by Nomad »

ORIGINAL: Mifune

"Whirraway traded in its bombs for a whopping 16 inch one" Can I be the first Whirraway Fanboy once one of those 16 inch squadrons are deployed?[:D]

I am sorry, you will have to wait for the 18.1" armed Nate. [:D]
User avatar
Mifune
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Florida

RE: CORRUPTED FILE SET RHS 2.10

Post by Mifune »

And what size airfield do we need to resupply?[X(]
Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.
User avatar
Ol_Dog
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 11:50 pm
Location: Southern Illinois

RE: CORRUPTED FILE SET RHS 2.10

Post by Ol_Dog »

an AV should do the trick
Common Sense is an uncommon virtue.
If you think you have everything under control, you don't fully understand the situation.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by el cid again »

RHSRAO is almost identical to RHSCVO.

It differs ONLY in these respects:

1) The Russians are active (not necessarily meaning bellegerant)

2) The Russians have submarines (which WILL sail if you let AI be boss - it thinks they are American or something like that).
User avatar
Mifune
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Florida

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by Mifune »

Looks like I wont be sleeping for some time tonight. Of course sleep is not neccesary for work? Is it?[X(]
Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by witpqs »

el cid,

FYI, the file set posted and distributed last night/this morning was 'RHSRAO201.zip', said to be CV with Russians inactive. Just a thought - maybe the seeming corruptions were because we got the wrong file (i.e. before it was finished?).
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by el cid again »

FYI, the file set posted and distributed last night/this morning was 'RHSRAO201.zip', said to be CV with Russians inactive. Just a thought - maybe the seeming corruptions were because we got the wrong file (i.e. before it was finished?).

Not sure.

There was never an RHSRAO 2.01. The first version was 2.12. Unless I made a typo! I tend to work 18 hours a day (counting modding) and sometimes I get tired!

I have incorporated reported issues - and lessons learned from testing - and some things for BBO - into a set uploaded as 2.13 for both CVO and RAO. If possible, all file sets will always be in sync - so the first release of BBO should be 2.13. You should usually find the same data in the same slot in all scenarios - unless it is scenario specific. [Thus Shinano is a carrier in CVO but a BB in BBO - logically enough]. If a ship is not used in a scenario it should be present but 9999 in the delay field. Thus - because I added the Amagi class - they are in CVO files now - even though the ships will never appear. [Amagi is my name for B-65 plan battlecruisers - because I have learned this plan was retained until AFTER the war began. See the thread on battleship availability.]
User avatar
Aterpa
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:52 am

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by Aterpa »

I have noticed some database errors in version 2.12:

- B1 Daitai/131 Kokutai arrives with 216 D3A2 -> should be 21
- G4M2e has 6" gun equiped instead of Ohka
- Ki-67 has 21" Mk 10 torpedo -> should have 18" type 91 torpedo
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by pad152 »

Can someome provide the link of where this is uploaded?

Elladan
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 7:15 am
Location: Manchester, UK

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by Elladan »

I noticed Ki-43-I Oscar has durability 26 in database (RHSRAO 2.12).
User avatar
Aterpa
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:52 am

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by Aterpa »

Version 2.12 and map patch 04 may:
The map art and the road/rail network does not match in most cases. (Siam, Burma, DEI, Philipines...)


Image
Attachments
Karte.jpg
Karte.jpg (125.07 KiB) Viewed 582 times
User avatar
Mifune
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Florida

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by Mifune »

pad152 have you recieved the files yet?
Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Aterpa

Version 2.12 and map patch 04 may:
The map art and the road/rail network does not match in most cases. (Siam, Burma, DEI, Philipines...)


Image

It looks like you might have the wrong pwhex.dat file loaded.

The new one came with the scenario files. If you copied it into the scenario folder, simply move (or copy) it to the main folder for your installation (not the art folder).

If you are unsure about where it belongs, look for the one that is already there, which will have an older creation date. Let me know if you need more help with that.
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by pad152 »

pad152 have you recieved the files yet?

Nope!
User avatar
Mifune
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Florida

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by Mifune »

pad you have PM
Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by m10bob »

I received my test files over several hours time, (in which I slept some of the time), and I suspect as I was patching onto existing files, I corrupted my scenerio files..I have requested fresh file from Cobra, (when he wakes up.)
I was beginning to think neither he nor Sid ever slept...........
Image

User avatar
Mifune
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Florida

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by Mifune »

m10bob you have PM
Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RUSSIAN ACTIVE OPTION UPLOADED

Post by el cid again »

B1 Daitai/131 Kokutai arrives with 216 D3A2 -> should be 21
- G4M2e has 6" gun equiped instead of Ohka
- Ki-67 has 21" Mk 10 torpedo -> should have 18" type 91 torpedo

Thanks - only put in the "slot" number for a faster fix.
Incorporated in all scenarios from version 2.14 - which will upload in a few minutes.

People with true errors (as opposed to philosophical errors) can directly send them to me. I will fix them instantaneously for the next two days - and within a day normally. And if you send me an error you will get the repaired file by direct reply. trevethans@aol.com

RHS has a different philosophy re "stability" and we seek CLEAN data over "exactly the same scenario." A change that ONLY changes a data field from obviously wrong to obviously right is not subject to any review - it is just adopted and then distributed.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”