If you could have one Allied A/C...

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
TheElf
Posts: 2800
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Pax River, MD

If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by TheElf »

If you could have one Allied A/C that is not currently in any of the Mods or stock what would it be and why?

If there is an aircraft in one mod that isn't found anywhere else and you think it should be, that qualifies too.
IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Image
User avatar
33Vyper
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 8:01 pm
Location: New Westminster BC

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by 33Vyper »

Avro Aero?
User avatar
JSBoomer
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:58 am
Location: Edmonton Alberta

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by JSBoomer »

The Avro Aero? What was that?
Jordan S. Bujtas
Deas Gu Cath

User avatar
TheElf
Posts: 2800
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Pax River, MD

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by TheElf »

ORIGINAL: 33Vyper

Avro Aero?

why? Justify it.
IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Image
User avatar
Kadrin
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: Orange, California

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Kadrin »

Not sure what is in every mod, but the plane I'd like to see added most would be the P-38L. Not 100% on this, but I think it was the most commonly produced variant.


And any scenario that goes to late 45/46:
F8F Bearcat
Typhoon/Tempest
P-80 Shooting Star
The Japanese Jets (not sure what they were called)
Image
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Iridium »

Oh goody...more planes that can shoot down 50 Zero's in under a minute.[:D]

F8F would be interesting but how would one rate it? Slightly better than the Hellcat?

Japanese jets were basically modified Me-262's, I forget their names at the moment. While some were made by their surrender some people might disagree with their addition for a million reasons.

Seems like a waste of time to add planes that are either too late for any action (the war is over already) or simply aren't needed, do you really need those extra 4 kills per lost plane/pilot?
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
User avatar
Kadrin
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: Orange, California

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Kadrin »

Well, if i wanted to shoot down 50 Zero's in under a minute I'd pick the F-86 Sabre. [:D]

I'll agree with you that they are not needed in the game (except maybe the P-38L), but it would certainly make it more historically accurate if they were availible in realistic amounts (no 5,000 P-80's sweeping the skies of Japan daily).

As for how one would rate an F8F, I'm not sure of its exact specs but I think somewhere around the same as a Hellcat, maybe a little faster, more manueverable with an excellent climb rate?

Anyway without giving too much away, I will say I've been playtesting BigB's upcoming mod, and the air combat in that has very believable outcomes. Might be worth looking at if you're tired of one-sided slaughters on both sides. [8D]
Image
Andy Mac
Posts: 12577
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Andy Mac »

Fairey Battle as it was a trainer for the empire scheme in India and Australia
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Terminus »

F9F Panther. Just because I thought it would look cool shooting off the catapults of the Midway and FDR.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Kadrin

And any scenario that goes to late 45/46:
F8F Bearcat
Typhoon/Tempest
P-80 Shooting Star
The Japanese Jets (not sure what they were called)

All of these already exist in various mods. And the Japanese jet was called the Nakajima Kikka.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Przemcio231
Posts: 1901
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Warsaw,Poland,EU:)

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Przemcio231 »

and it only arment ware bombs as Kika did not have any guns...
Image

Pinky: Hey Brain what are we goeing to do this evening?
Brain: The Usual Pinky we will try to take over the World;)
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Terminus »

The first version didn't, that's true. It was very quickly redesigned to carry 2*30mm cannon.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6417
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by JeffroK »

Hawker Fury/Sea Fury

Max speed 460mph
Range 700miles on Internal tanks

4 x 20mm Hispano Cannon
Racks for 12 x 60lb Rockets or 2 x 1000lb Bombs

Sadly delayed by the problems with the Centaurus engine

DH 103 Hornet / Sea Hornet
Max speed 472mph
Range 1500miles with 2 x 100gal tanks

4 x 20mm Hispano
Racks for 8 x 60lb Rockets or up to 2,000lbs of bomb.

CA-15
The Australian upgrade of the Mustang

POWER PLANT: One 2,035 hp Rolls-Royce Griffin Mk 61, with two stage, two-speed blower.

DIMENSIONS: Span, 36 ft; length, 36 ft 3 ins; height, 12 ft 2 ins.

WEIGHTS: Empty, 7,540 lb; loaded, 12,340 lb

PERFORMANCE: Max speed, 448 mph at 26,400 ft. Rate of climb, 4,900 ft/min. Service ceiling, 39,000 ft. Range, 2,540 miles at 5,000 ft.

ARMAMENT: Six 0.50 in. machine guns in wings. Bomb load carried externally beneath wings

The CA-15 airframe was originally designed to use a radial engine, the 2,300 hp Pratt and Whitney R-2800 with a turbo-charger installation

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Reg »

Avro Anson.

Like the the Fairey Battle it was used by the Empire Air Training Scheme but unlike the Battle, the Anson equiped front line squadrons engaged on coastal ASW patrols for a time.

eg:
No.66 Squadron May'43 - Jan'44 Bundaberg* QLD
No.67 Squadron Jan'43 - Nov'45 Melbourne VIC (Laverton)
No.71 Squadron Jan'43 - Aug'44 Lowood QLD, Coffs Harbour NSW
No.73 Squadron May'42 - Aug'44 Cootamundra NSW, Nowra NSW

* Home of.... (shameless plug!!!)
Image
Attachments
bundy.jpg
bundy.jpg (3.71 KiB) Viewed 216 times
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Reg »

ORIGINAL: JeffK

CA-15
The Australian upgrade of the Mustang

Please don't perpetrate that myth. It was completely indigenous.

In fact, it looked a bit like an FW-190 at one stage of design....
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6417
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by JeffroK »

No,

The P&W R-2800 was never made available.

But why didnt anyone else try the Griffon in a Mustang??
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: Iridium

Oh goody...more planes that can shoot down 50 Zero's in under a minute.[:D]

F8F would be interesting but how would one rate it? Slightly better than the Hellcat?

Japanese jets were basically modified Me-262's, I forget their names at the moment. While some were made by their surrender some people might disagree with their addition for a million reasons.

Seems like a waste of time to add planes that are either too late for any action (the war is over already) or simply aren't needed, do you really need those extra 4 kills per lost plane/pilot?

The F8F was a point defense interceptor--the lightest airframe that could be powered by its engine. High RoC, not a large bombload nor long range. The F7F was an anti-bomber destroyer (like the Tomcat). The F4U and F6F were traditional multi-purpose high-performance fighters, with the F4U being particularly useful as a fighter bomber. The F6F was more forgiving in carrier operations.

The Sea Fury was the naval version of the F86.

You pays your money and makes your choice.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6417
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: herwin

ORIGINAL: Iridium

Oh goody...more planes that can shoot down 50 Zero's in under a minute.[:D]

F8F would be interesting but how would one rate it? Slightly better than the Hellcat?

Japanese jets were basically modified Me-262's, I forget their names at the moment. While some were made by their surrender some people might disagree with their addition for a million reasons.

Seems like a waste of time to add planes that are either too late for any action (the war is over already) or simply aren't needed, do you really need those extra 4 kills per lost plane/pilot?

The F8F was a point defense interceptor--the lightest airframe that could be powered by its engine. High RoC, not a large bombload nor long range. The F7F was an anti-bomber destroyer (like the Tomcat). The F4U and F6F were traditional multi-purpose high-performance fighters, with the F4U being particularly useful as a fighter bomber. The F6F was more forgiving in carrier operations.

The Sea Fury was the naval version of the F86.

You pays your money and makes your choice.

the Bearcat made a respectable Fighter Bomber, the French used them in Vietnam in the ground attack mode. Not long range though and the French didnt have the belly tanks. With Internal fuel it could go 1100 miles and with a belly tank over 1900 miles.

The Hawker Sea Fury is a totally different aircraft from the North American FJ-2 Fury which was an F-86E development
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Reg »

ORIGINAL: herwin
The Sea Fury was the naval version of the F86.
I think the Sea Fury he is referring to is the Hawker Sea Fury (as used by the Royal Australian Navy post war). It is the naval version of the Hawker Fury which itself is a light weight radial engined derivative of the Tempest series.

A very nice machine....
Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: If you could have one Allied A/C...

Post by Nomad »

Well if you are looking for a late war USN aircraft, go for a Skyraider. [:D]
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”