Is the PO a better defender?

Norm Koger's The Operational Art of War III is the next game in the award-winning Operational Art of War game series. TOAW3 is updated and enhanced version of the TOAW: Century of Warfare game series. TOAW3 is a turn based game covering operational warfare from 1850-2015. Game scale is from 2.5km to 50km and half day to full week turns. TOAW3 scenarios have been designed by over 70 designers and included over 130 scenarios. TOAW3 comes complete with a full game editor.

Moderators: JAMiAM, ralphtricky

Post Reply
ioticus
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:26 pm

Is the PO a better defender?

Post by ioticus »

I always thought the TOAW PO was pretty good on attack, but weak on defense. I notice the change notes say the PO is a better attacker. Has its ability to defend been improved as well?
User avatar
ralphtricky
Posts: 6675
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:05 am
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

RE: Is the PO a better defender?

Post by ralphtricky »

ORIGINAL: ioticus

I always thought the TOAW PO was pretty good on attack, but weak on defense. I notice the change notes say the PO is a better attacker. Has its ability to defend been improved as well?
It's a little better. It should be more realistic in some scenarios, since it understands being cut off from supply, and being encircled better than it did.

Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.
JAMiAM
Posts: 6127
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:35 am

RE: Is the PO a better defender?

Post by JAMiAM »

ORIGINAL: ioticus

I always thought the TOAW PO was pretty good on attack, but weak on defense. I notice the change notes say the PO is a better attacker. Has its ability to defend been improved as well?
It depends on the force ratios, and the state of fluidity in the battle field. It will fight better than it would before, with roughly equal numbers, and in fluid battles. In static, defensive situations, it hasn't really improved.
ioticus
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:26 pm

RE: Is the PO a better defender?

Post by ioticus »

Thanks for the candid response, and thanks for updating what is still my favorite wargame!  I just read it was released, and will be refreshing the store cache constantly until it is on my hard drive.
User avatar
ralphtricky
Posts: 6675
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:05 am
Location: Colorado Springs
Contact:

RE: Is the PO a better defender?

Post by ralphtricky »

ORIGINAL: ioticus

Thanks for the candid response, and thanks for updating what is still my favorite wargame! I just read it was released, and will be refreshing the store cache constantly until it is on my hard drive.
There's a link at the top of the forum that goes straight to the store, and avoids that problem.
Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.
Post Reply

Return to “Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III”