1.801 first impressions

Post bug reports and ask for tech support here.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Spooky
Posts: 801
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 2:16 am
Location: Froggy Land
Contact:

1.801 first impressions

Post by Spooky »

Yuri just sent me his first impressions of the 1.801 patch since he did not manage to register.

Before I start my first PBEM game, I decided to make a quick run of full campaign against hard JapAI under 1.801 . Everything is under human control. Stock scenario 15

Bugs I found so far:

1. British Ruler class CVE (big cheater in game). Make any TF with this ship and hit replenish from port. Result: You have >1000000 fuel at that base.
2. In January 45 my some of mine CV’s started receiving F4U-1D as it should be, but it is now November 45 and half of CV’s didn’t receive them, but F6Fs reduced from 42 to 36 max. Shouldn’t they all receive Corsairs? They were all in SF for more than 6 months. Just some converted, some not.
3. How about Wasp CV? I still have 30 15 15 12 group on him by the end of 45. WAD or bug? What about any conversion for these groups?
4. At start of game I sent nearly all US/Australian/British CA/CL close to Japan so I can lose them. I lost them all I think. Interesting part started when they started to respawn. All of them respawned as US cruisers, but with Australian captains and Australian seaplanes. Very annoying if you try to make amphib. TF with some CA/CLs but cannot select any US commander for invasion. Instead I have a choice of only Australian commanders. Bug?
5. Russians. In July 45 they started conversion to inf.corpses. They (divisions) disappear one by one and next turn they reappear as Inf.corps. (each 1118 AV btw.). But some divisions didn’t convert to corps. They disappear and reappear as same divisions. Bug or WAD?
6. Vladivostok port: no ships can refuel there before and after activation.
7. Some Russian fighters autoconvert in 8/45 to bombers. Some bombers autoconvert to fighters, changing some groups from 21 to 63 planes (Bad for pilot pool)
8. I landed all Russian inf/mech/tank corpses in Japan, cleared Tokyo of 250+units then went with Russian Golden Horde to Osaka (around 300 units there). Couldn’t take in 1 assault ( 1250000!!!infantry attacking) , than decided to drop A-Bomb on Osaka and see what happens. Very sad I couldn’t put B-29 on 100ft N-strike J (minimum 8000). I didn’t know that Golden Horde is immune to nuclear blast. No troops were damaged. Bug or WAD?
9. In 2 weeks of fighting I took finally Osaka forcing 300+ units to retreat. Next turn Osaka turned to 4th fleet command (Japanese) but with American flag like other American bases. Changing Osaka to any other allied command brings nothing. Next turn it is again 4th fleet. Bug
10. This is connected with #8 bug. All planes based in Osaka losing their target in 2-3 turns. Let say I’m ground attacking with planes closest base and in 2-3 turns they all switch to ground attack without a target and stop bombing (annoying).

No signs of leader disappearance – excellent
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 7983
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by jwilkerson »

Interesting report !!!

Both entertaining AND useful (unusual in that regard !).

Yuri doesn't "pull his punches" he swings with both Sledgehammers !!!

Thanks Marc,

Joe W.
AE Project Lead
SCW Project Lead
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Who is Yuri?
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 7983
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by jwilkerson »

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

Who is Yuri?

Yuri ? Uh, he would be the guy that sent the report to Marc !? [;)]
AE Project Lead
SCW Project Lead
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by dtravel »

I thought he was the guy going 'round in circles over our heads.
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6414
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by JeffroK »

I wish he could spell Corps correctly,
 
I thought the Red Army was getting wiped out!!
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Oxlamon
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 4:18 am

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by Oxlamon »

Hi everybody!

Actually Yuri is me :)

I couldnt get my password for couple of days from matrixgames. Now finally I got it.
Thats the reason I sent this report to Spooky.

Thanks Spooky!


User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 7983
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by jwilkerson »

ORIGINAL: Oxlamon

Hi everybody!

Actually Yuri is me :)

I couldnt get my password for couple of days from matrixgames. Now finally I got it.
Thats the reason I sent this report to Spooky.

Thanks Spooky!



Hi Yuri - Welcome !!

And thanks for the report !

We will look at some of these items to see if they can be fixed !


Joe W.

AE Project Lead
SCW Project Lead
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Howdy![8D]
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 7983
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by jwilkerson »

ORIGINAL: JeffK

I wish he could spell Corps correctly,

I thought the Red Army was getting wiped out!!

Hecque he probably wishes WE could spell Corpses correctly [;)][:D] .. but I also thought the conversion to corpses sounded rather ominous !
AE Project Lead
SCW Project Lead
Marineatsea
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:00 pm

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by Marineatsea »

Is there a read me file on the fixes in 1.801?
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5185
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by Don Bowen »


Yuri produced a clear and concise list of program problems and was able to provide save games for most items. Several of the points that he raised directly correlate to line items on the next patch’s fix list.

Thanks, Yuri

User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by dtravel »

File name is WhatsNew.rtf and WhatsNew.pdf.  (Same file, different formats.)
 
[font="times new roman"]Note that v1.8.0.1 incremental production release includes the following changes:[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Bug Fixes:[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]1. Corrected Float Plane Airgroup size calculation. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]The enablement of single-squadron carrier air groups in Version 1.8 caused a miscalculation in the size of Float Plane airgroups aboard non-carrier type ships.  [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Ensured separation of processing of air groups for carriers and other, floatplane carrying ships.  Normal processing will recover the damaged airgroup data.[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]2. Text overflow on combat report. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Addition of "Beginning Assault Value" to the combat report in V1.8 caused the text string to exceed the allotted space when reporting large formations and values. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Removed word "Beginning". [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]3. Correct display of airgroup fragment if transfer of an airgroup generated a new fragment. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]An airgroup that has 1 or more non-ready aircraft will leave them behind when being transferred to a new location.  A fragment will be created at the "transfer-from" site to hold these aircraft.  The code was losing track of the proper airgroup to be displayed during this process and would display a previous working fragment - frequently one from the other side.  [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Saved and used correct pointer to transferred airgroup. [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]4. Corrected Leader Assignment for airgroups without leaders when first pilot assigned. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]An airgroup (probably fragment) created without pilots will not have a leader assigned. When the first pilot is assigned it should automatically become the airgroup leader. When additional pilots are assigned they are then compared to the rank/experience of the current airgroup leader to see if the new pilot should replace the existing leader. An error during the creation of "no pilot/no leader" fragments incorrectly reset the leader values, resulting in random failure to designate the first pilot assigned as the airgroup leader.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Properly initialized the variable.  Also found a display-control variable that was not being properly maintained when a leader was assigned. This resulted in either a one-turn delay in displaying the correct leader or a "flash" of Staff Officer before the correct leader was displayed. Also fixed. [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]5. Disband of airgroups prohibited if they have fragments on the map. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Expand existing check for fragments and prevent disband (with message) [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]6. LCU fragments improperly receiving reinforcements. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]During turn processing of Land Units with multiple fragments, the system could temporarily lose track of the proper unit(s) that should receive reinforcements.  This could result in cut off or unsupplied fragments being improperly reinforced.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Prevented focus shift away from the proper unit.[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]7. Corrected multiple "home base" tables to include Canada. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Some of the processes that required reference to a National Home Base did not properly designate a home base for Canada.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Provided missing reference (base is Vancouver)[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]8. Fix for Pick Up troops by air transport when first available Land Unit is selected by default.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]When the Pick Up Troops option is selected on the Air Group screen the first "pickupable" land unit at the target base is displayed as if it was selected by default.  However this selection was incomplete and the player had to force the selection - by moving away and then back to the unit if necessary.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Properly set default.  [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]9. Patch for airgroup load routine when a parent airgroup and a fragment of a different parent were loaded at the same time.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]The load control routine was improperly handling load when an airgroup fragment was loaded at the same time as a different parent air group.  This resulted in the actual load routine being confused between the actual parent of the fragment and (different) parent previously loaded.  [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Set proper relationship without regard to load sequence.[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]10. Torpedo Attack Altitude corrections.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Torpedo-carrying aircraft with Naval or Port attack as a primary mission and Airfield attack as a secondary mission would sometimes make torpedo attacks at the airgroup assigned altitude (frequently 6000 feet).   [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Ensured torpedos will be dropped from 200 feet if primary mission is naval or port attack.[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]11. Replenishment CVEs in replenishment and carrier task forces "bleeding" damaged aircraft to pools.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]CVEs with replenishment airgroups (designated as Wings) that left port without ensuring that all aircraft were in ready status would have damaged aircraft transferred to the aircraft pool.  The exaggerated size of the replenishment airgroups was triggering this movement as the over-capacity checks were not properly recognizing replenishment wings.  [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: Adjusted over-capacity routines to recognize replenishment wing airgroup sizes.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Note: Players should NEVER transfer replenishment wings off of the CVE on which they arrive and NEVER NEVER place another airgroup on a CVE that has a replenishment air wing.  Just don't do it - it will mess things up big time.[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]12. Re-set max range when airgroup is manually or automatically upgraded.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Upgrade of airgroup was not properly re-setting default maximum range.  [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Fix: applied default based on range of "upgrade-to" aircraft.[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Enhancements[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]1. Fill airgroup with pilots button and function added. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Airgroups that need two or more pilots will now display a "Get n Pilots" button (where n is number of pilots needed). Pressing this button will select n pilots and is equivalent to pressing the "Get Pilot" button n times. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Note: Button does NOT show "grayed out" when less than 2 pilots are required. If only a single pilot is needed the "Get Pilot" button is sufficient and a grayed-out "Get 1 Pilot" is superfluous. A grayed-out "Get 0 Pilots" is useless and rather humorous. [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]2. Draw a single aircraft from pool button and function added. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Each press of this button will transfer one aircraft from the pool to the airgroup. The button display includes the number of aircraft in the pool. Button is displayed "grayed out" if function is not allowed for any reason. Allows very precise airgroup size management and is especially useful when there are only a few aircraft available. Display of pool size is very nice. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Note: Function is allowed even if "Do Not Upgrade" is selected. It is subject to all restrictions of normal airgroup reinforcement (no cheating!). [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]3. Airgroups may be disbanded into the aircraft/pilot pool IF THEY ARE LOCATED IN THE NATIONAL MAIN BASE. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Previously they had to be disbanded into another airgroup and could not be disbanded if an airgroup with the same aircraft type/Nationality was not available in the same base. This restriction still applies for all groups not at the main base and will also be used if possible at the National Main Base.   The companion feature of "Withdraw Group" is similarly implemented only the group and all aircraft/pilots are placed in the pending aircraft reinforcement list.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Notes: [/font]
[font="times new roman"]If there is another group of the same type at the National HQ base, the group will disband into it normally.  If there is no such group a confirmation step will ask the player if he wants to disband the group into the pool.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]If Disbanded, aircraft are returned to the pool and the result is visible when viewing the pool. Pilots are returned to the Named pilot queue that are waiting for assignment and not to the actual "pilot pool". See Enhancement 4. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]If Withdraw Group is selected, the group with all planes and pilots will be withdrawn for 60 days.[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]4. Add available Named Pilot count to Pilot Pool list.[/font]
[font="times new roman"]Named Pilots (sometimes called Historical Pilots) are initially pilots that have been defined in the editor.  New "Named Pilots" can be created during game play by removing "generated" pilots from squadrons by either disbandment of the squadron or removal of pilots by the "running out of pilots" routines. There are two groups of "Named Pilots":[/font]
[font="times new roman"]1. Pilots designated for a specific air group (in the editor) whose delay has expired but have not yet been assigned to the squadron (not yet needed).[/font]
[font="times new roman"]2. Pilots of specific Nationality that are available (no remaining delay), have no default group assignment, and have not yet assigned to a group (enabled in Version 1.8). [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"][/font] 
[font="times new roman"]5. Airgroups having no planes but having some pilots may now be loaded onto AKs (load cost calculated as number of pilots). [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Previously an airgroup that has all aircraft destroyed but retained a few pilots was frozen in place. It could not be flown nor picked up by a cargo ship. The assigned pilots were effectively lost and were merely waiting to be destroyed. This modification allows the airgroup to be evacuated by sea. It can then be reinforced, merged, or taken to the national home base and disbanded (Enhancement 3, above) to recover the pilots. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Note: Load cost for an airgroup is calculated as number of pilots - very low load cost but takes up the single "passenger" slot. Load costs for airgroups with planes are based solely on the planes and do not include the pilots. [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]6. "Push" of supply from a well supplied base to outlying bases now limited to need (human players only). [/font]
[font="times new roman"]The previous code will push supply from a central base to outlying bases and units based on two factors: [/font]
[font="times new roman"]a. Need - bases and units that are short on supply will receive supplies up to need (based on requested supply less amount already on hand) [/font]
[font="times new roman"]b. Extra - additional supply will be dispersed to bases (but not units) if the sending base is "rich" in supply. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]This push of extra supply results in difficulty in accumulating supplies at main bases. An example of this is supplies at Port Moresby being pushed to Buna when Port Moresby needs them and Buna does not. This enhancement will remove the "b. Extra" supply movement. [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Note:  This enhancement is implemented for human players only.  A side under computer control will use the original code.[/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]Other - Software Library Upgrade [/font]
[font="times new roman"] [/font]
[font="times new roman"]1. The library routines that process save game compression/de-compression during save and load have been updated to current versions.[/font]
 
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
Marineatsea
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:00 pm

RE: 1.801 first impressions

Post by Marineatsea »

Thanks the Pilot replacemnt button is handy! I guess the 30,000 airplan limit still is not fixed
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”