Sneer vs Raver , Banzaiiii!!!!

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: The Russian question

Post by Sneer »

but there is no russian navy - no transports - so no russian unit will ever enter Home islands
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

for stat-lovers

Post by Sneer »

points for 2nd april 43
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: for stat-lovers

Post by Sneer »

technical error

Image
Attachments
points443.jpg
points443.jpg (59.63 KiB) Viewed 181 times
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: The Russian question

Post by Raverdave »

ORIGINAL: Sneer

but there is no russian navy - no transports - so no russian unit will ever enter Home islands

Just because you can't see a rooshan navy does not mmean that there is not one. Lend-Lease is a wonderful thing !
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: The Russian question

Post by Sneer »

good i have already fortified kuriles
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Raverdave »

This is where I want to go....................

Image
Attachments
Futureall..kpaths..jpg
Futureall..kpaths..jpg (111.84 KiB) Viewed 181 times
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Sneer »

all of them ???

interesting thing
for the 1st time p-38 were spotted at chungking - 2 destroyed today on ground

User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Raverdave »

P-38s at Chungking eh?   Well well well.  
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Sneer »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 04/04/43

Day Air attack on Chungking , at 43,32
 
Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 20
Ki-21 Sally x 117
Ki-49 Helen x 387
Ki-15 Babs x 7
 
Allied aircraft
no flights
 
No Japanese losses
 
Allied aircraft losses
I-16c: 1 destroyed
P-38G Lightning: 1 destroyed
 
 
Allied ground losses:
279 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
 
Airbase hits 15
Airbase supply hits 11
Runway hits 416
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by veji1 »

Sneer, how is the Chungking thing going ?

Do you think you'll manage to take it and sweep China for good ?
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Sneer »

sooner or later yes
certainly before russia will enter war

User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Raverdave »

Actually I had 20+ P-38s there sometime ago trying to catch you unescorted bombers. The two that were left on the ground were damaged because of the poor state of the runways...........snapped their landing gear.

Image
Attachments
p38crash.jpg
p38crash.jpg (18.03 KiB) Viewed 181 times
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by veji1 »

So if 1/3 China Army goes to Kwantung, 1/3 goes to India, 1/3 stays to garrison the place and 1/3 is bought out for use in the Pac right ?    ;)
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Raverdave »

Bah !   China will never fall !
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Sneer »

i don't need to bought so many unit for PAC - if i can switch southern army from india it will be enough + there will be few new divisions in china soon - good to guard

sad news I 154 sunk today - another convoy heads to darwin ( currently east of broome)
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Raverdave »

My ASW is getting better and better.................and with the new DEs now coming online there will be a lot more being sunk soon.[8D]
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Sneer »

tough luck
truth is that my new PC type works really good
2 subs scored and I think 1 heavily damaged by 1 hunter killer group and allied subs are no more present on my internal LOC
i have 3 at this moment and next 3 will go within 2 months - meanwhile Raverdave gets dezens of good ships

but it works even stronger for allied player

i have little problem with naval production at the moment but expect to have everything under control within next 3-4 months when I get my new carrier division ready
good news
Hiyo is almost finished in shipyard
Akagi well within 30's so ap 3 next months and it will be in service again
Kongo - funny thing - when i spotted enemy lost conwoy close to gilberts 2 weeks ago Kongo escort TF was 60 miles from these merchants but with 6knots and 80 sys there was no fun to risk her
Musashi repairs are going smoothly - ship should be back in service this year
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: convoy intercepted

Post by Sneer »

4/11/43
looks like "convoy intercepted" is my sign for readers
small naval engagement north of wyndham - I attempted to intercept convoy with light forces
neither side gained surprise
yubari + tama + nagara + 4 dd intercepted 5 allied DD
shirakumo(mag explosion) + nepal( 2 long lances) sunk
hamakaze heavily damaged ( will be lost I feel)- yubari ate torp but in good shape
once again enemy intercpeted smoothly but this time luck was not with me
my cruisers barely took part in this battle (Nagara and Yubari did not shoot) and in DDvsDD fight allied were better
convoy was not seen
so both tactical and strategic victory to allied

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 04/10/43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat at 28,83

Japanese Ships
CL Nagara
CL Tama, Shell hits 1
CL Yubari
DD Hamakaze, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
DD Shinonome, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Shirakumo, Shell hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
DD Hasu

Allied Ships
DD Warramunga
DD Van Galen
DD Foxhound
DD Griffin
DD Nepal, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat at 28,83

Japanese Ships
CL Nagara
CL Tama
CL Yubari, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DD Hamakaze, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Shinonome, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Shirakumo, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
DD Hasu

Allied Ships
DD Warramunga, Shell hits 3
DD Van Galen
DD Foxhound
DD Griffin


User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: convoy intercepted

Post by Sneer »

little use of old Jap CLs[8|]
low firepower
low ROF
weak torps  and of old type
only agano is closer to night rider type
too weak for normal combat
without AAA weapons
only DD leaders and fast transport platform

i would be happy to see few new pre conversion kumano type CLs
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16728
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Future Allied attack paths.

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: veji1

So if 1/3 China Army goes to Kwantung, 1/3 goes to India, 1/3 stays to garrison the place and 1/3 is bought out for use in the Pac right ?    ;)

That's 4/3. *Scratches head*
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”