Sneer vs Raver , Banzaiiii!!!!

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: air offensives

Post by Raverdave »

China will be the russian break-out point once they come into the war.  :)
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: air offensives

Post by Sneer »

i will be happy if in second half of 45 Russia will be my main problem [;)]
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: air offensives

Post by Raverdave »

Well if you were anywhere close to being a good player you would cause an "incident" on the boarder to bring the Russians into the war.........but seeing as you are just an "average" player i doubt that you will do this.[;)]
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: air offensives

Post by Sneer »

if i did not loose so much time in china ...who knows :-)
now it would be ....... you know [;)]

crawling in the south started
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: air offensives

Post by Sneer »

what is allied max para range?
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: air offensives

Post by pauk »

hehe, average player... now that was a funny, really funny...[:D]
Image
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: air offensives

Post by Raverdave »

ORIGINAL: Sneer

what is allied max para range?


About as far as a C-47 will fly[:D]
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

nightmare night

Post by Sneer »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 06/03/43
difficult to say - looks like it was last combat mission from radm Kono...
considering he will not be shortened in his size - emperor wants his head
i think he will be used for kamikaze mission later in 44
interception of convoy west of Broome in my hunting waters
no surprise - 2 rounds 4k and 6k distance
almost no gunnery fire from my ships
only 13% of torps shot
inactive DDs
like on allied gunnery practice
can't say I like such combats
2 CLs have moderate float
if my CLs can't perform this mission i don't know what combat mission they can do
I don't want to move my carriers after each convoy but they looks like the only competent force on hand
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat at 17,83

Japanese Ships
CL Sendai, Shell hits 1
CL Jintsu, Shell hits 1
CL Nagara, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CL Isuzu, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage
CL Natori, Shell hits 1
CL Tama, Shell hits 2
CL Kiso, Shell hits 4, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DD Nowaki
DD Kikuzuki

Allied Ships
DD DeHaven, Shell hits 4, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DD Duncan, Shell hits 2, on fire
DD Gillespie
DD McCall
DD Ellet, Shell hits 1
DD Case
DD Porter
AD Black Hawk
MLE Liloa, Shell hits 1
AR John C. Fremont

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALLIED STARTED TERITORY REGAINING !!!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Merauke

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 1709 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 54

Defending force 160 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1

Allied max assault: 26 - adjusted assault: 5

Japanese max defense: 0 - adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 5 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Merauke base !!!


User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: air offensives

Post by Sneer »

ORIGINAL: pauk

hehe, average player... now that was a funny, really funny...[:D]

Raverdave is disappointed by my performance
too many toys were left to him and now he can't proove he is good player[:D]
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: air offensives

Post by Raverdave »

One word..................RADAR [:D]
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: air offensives

Post by Sneer »

yup... very probable
but as far as I know I had Radar too

question 1 - I don't remember type or even if it is Surface type
second - i don't know which jap radar doesn't waork - or if any wokrs
certainly allied radar is better
radar is responsible for allied good shooting
but still i would like to see my ships shooting at all [8|]

too many nice toys to allied
veji1
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:28 pm

RE: air offensives

Post by veji1 »

god this was a bad result... Get a new admiral asap..
Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: air offensives

Post by Raverdave »

Allied RADAR is much better than Jap RADAR.
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

RE: air offensives

Post by Sneer »

looks like i should scrap my old CLs
there is little use for them now
they dissapointed in almost all night combats

Japan is master in designing crappy equipment
night irvings , cls and so on
User avatar
Sneer
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:24 pm

P-38

Post by Sneer »

after last turns i notice drop in p-38 activity

i think that pools reserves are rather low at this moment as p-38 was last half of year workhorse of allied air power
i estimate 5 big (72) groups are equipped with this planes
3 in east india
1 in north OZ
1 at cooktown
p38 was introduced in 10/42
144 planes arrived as reinforcements
570 were lost
i don't remember replacement_reinforcement rate but i think that with 350 plane already in groups there is little or very little in reserve
maybe i'm wrong
certainly this stance will not last long but it would be nice to see allied are at least somehow limited
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: P-38

Post by Raverdave »

Not limited at all, just converting over to the J model as well as resting them for the next push.
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: P-38

Post by pauk »

.

Image
Attachments
forum3.jpg
forum3.jpg (11.73 KiB) Viewed 163 times
Image
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: P-38

Post by pauk »

app 550 P-38 were produced since October...

It seems Raver had a good teacher for lying - Luskan[;)]
Image
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: P-38

Post by Raverdave »

Bloody spies !   Should all be shot !
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: P-38

Post by Speedysteve »

LOL[:D]
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”