Surrounded units

Post advice on tactics and strategies here; share your experience on how to become a better wargamer.

Moderators: ralphtricky, JAMiAM

Post Reply
User avatar
Okimaw
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Land of the brave, home of the Cree

Surrounded units

Post by Okimaw »

I know we've gone over the situation of surrounded units being held until the supply is zero so part of their equipment doesn't go into the replacement pool. So does this mean that if you make suicide attacks and the unit or units hopefully "evaporate" then their contribution to the replacement pool is still made?
I have returned
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4145
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Surrounded units

Post by golden delicious »

You could do this. Two points;

a) a 'successful' evaporation would reflect elements of the unit slipping out of the encirclement to the replacement pool (obviously at the expense of other elements of the unit being lost entirely).
b) the encircling forces will then be free to move on and do something else, and if you were fortified before, that status is now lost. Even a relatively small unit if fortified in the right place can be a real pain to the enemy advance.

Also note that whether their supply is "zero" is irrelevant; its a matter of whether the units were able to draw supply at the start of the turn. So this gambit would only work for force 2 on the turn on which their units were cut off.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”