Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Sigh...[8|] I've done it, and it came up about even. Both ships spanked the other hard, and both were combat ineffective at the end, but neither was sunk.

The NJ was significantly faster, allowing her to control the range of the engagement, so she was unlikely to lose. Whether she could win was another issue. The NJ's maximum rate of fire was about 50% higher in the beginning and was sustainable for longer. On the other hand, the Yamato's AP shells were about 20% more destructive and had slightly greater penetration, and she had heavier armor. Their hulls were equal (i.e., within 1% of each other) in wetted area--which is the best predictor of warship survivability against *penetrating* AP rounds. Barring an accident, it would have been a draw.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
User avatar
captskillet
Posts: 2493
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 10:21 pm
Location: Louisiana & the 2007 Nat Champ LSU Fightin' Tigers

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by captskillet »

I'm gonna try and set it up using Warship Combat from the NWS website........let you know later if I am successful.
"Git thar fust with the most men" - Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest

Image
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by siRkid »

[font="times new roman"]The tutorial scenario was set up so people could do things like this. All ships start in port and aircraft grounded to make setting up a match easy.  I don't know if those two ships are in the tutorial scenario but if they are you could setup and run in just a few minutes.[/font]
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by siRkid »

What I think would be fun is to put evey ship and sub from both sides in the same hex and run the turn.[X(]
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by RevRick »

One of the first things to go, by and large, in Action Stations when a ship starts taking heavy hits, is the radar. This is not unbelievable because the wave guides are very susceptible to damage when heavy explosions are taking place and whipping the ship. I think Zimm had them conk out too much, but it's not outside the realm of possibility. The other thing which happened a lot was fire control would be shifted from forward main to aft main, and sometimes to secondary battery control.

Secondly, there is no way that the USN battle line steams circles around that group of ships. Nagatos speed has been under reported for years according to at least one book I have, which means that the slowest ship in the IJN line would be doing around 26-27 kts, probably 25 at battle speed. The entire North Caroline and South Dakota class had a max speed of 28 kts, and usually never got much above 26. That means that if they meant to hold the line formation, they would have been limited to at best a two kt speed advantage over the Kurita's force, depending in the condition of the bottom, boilers, and turbines.
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by Iridium »

I'll just point out that Japanese (Yamato's) optics were better than US standards. Also, radar targeting wasn't exactly perfected by this time. From what I've read I've always gotten the impression that radar gunnery was better than US optics at night but during the day they were somewhat pointless.

Could either ship sink the other? Yes. Would it be mostly luck? Yes.[:D]
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
User avatar
MkXIV
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: North Georgia

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by MkXIV »

Although I think We can all Agree that the New Jersey would win today [;)]
F4U Corsair; When you Absolutely, Positively need to kill every freaking Zero in a 40 mile hex....
User avatar
Monter_Trismegistos
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:58 pm
Location: Gdansk

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by Monter_Trismegistos »

ORIGINAL: MkXIV
Although I think We can all Agree that the New Jersey would win today [;)]
I doubt. Today New Jersey doesn't have any ASW weapons - Yamato today is under the waves [:D]
Nec Temere Nec Timide
Bez strachu ale z rozwagą
Distiller
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:51 pm

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by Distiller »

in my case, NJ refused to fire most of the time and, predictably, got spanked, worst case so far 55 hits with no return fire, NJ sank immediately....

most balanced so far: Yamato 30/8/31 NJ 50/40/20 dmg points....


something's wrong here, japs alwys get surprise even in broad daylight, knock out radar, close to 2000yds and so on... must be my save i think (probability calculations very one sided or whatever)
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by m10bob »

Image

User avatar
LittleJoe
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 1:22 pm

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by LittleJoe »

Just tested it myself in tutorial (should really be doing my turn, but couldnt resist)

The 'fight' lasted 3 rounds, with the Yamato gaining suprise over the New Jersey, which it what Distiller found as well i think.

But the Yamato got heavily defeated, the first combat was a close affair, with both ships 'on fire' and the Yamato taking 5 shells, and the NJ 4.

After the first day, it was obvious USN damage control would win the fight, with the Yamato suffring from 28 system damage, 22 flood and 29 fire damage, whilst the New Jersey, seemingly taking similar hits only had, 10 system 0 float and 7 fire damage.

Then on the second turn, the Yamato suprised (again) the New Jersey at night at 2000 yards, but got hit up badly, taking 10 shell hits, mostly from NJ 16 guns, with the Yamato failing to return fire.

The Yamato was on her last legs, 82 system, 71 float, 25 fire damage, but no day combat took place, as strangely it was the New Jersey that fled back to home port, Cowardly Americans!


Strange that on mine and Distillers tests the japs always got the suprise!
Image
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by RevRick »

AHA!! Yet another example of IJN bias in the game!!!!

I have noticed that two. I've had a squadron of AG's get the surprise on a squadron of PT boats all too often. Of course, this is also the game that puts Tanaka in command of AG's once in a while.
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by Terminus »

Japanese fanboys everywhere...[8|]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
2ndACR
Posts: 5524
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 7:32 am
Location: Irving,Tx

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by 2ndACR »

Since I only play Japan, that is the way it is supposed to be.[;)]
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: LittleJoe
Strange that on mine and Distillers tests the japs always got the suprise!

There might be a "night suprise bonus" built into the system, as the Japanese were very good at it in the first year of the war. But by the time Yamato could fight New Jersey it should have "switched over" in reccognition of the US Radar superiority. Maybe 2x3 forgot to put in the "switch". Or maybe the Japanese were just lucky twice. I suspect the former, as it fits the overall pattern better.
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

ORIGINAL: LittleJoe
Strange that on mine and Distillers tests the japs always got the suprise!

There might be a "night suprise bonus" built into the system, as the Japanese were very good at it in the first year of the war. But by the time Yamato could fight New Jersey it should have "switched over" in reccognition of the US Radar superiority. Maybe 2x3 forgot to put in the "switch". Or maybe the Japanese were just lucky twice. I suspect the former, as it fits the overall pattern better.

Actually, I doubt the radar superiority would have held up very long. It's amazing how much shock damage can be done by a non-penetrating 1 ton+ shell hit. On the other hand, air spotting was a real show-stopper--that's the reason having a small carrier with your battleships was standard practice. If you had an aircraft aloft and the enemy didn't, you didn't need to worry about shock as much.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
Distiller
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:51 pm

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by Distiller »

 That's what all these Petes are for, spotting. too bad they can't be used in their intended role, isn't it?
 
 
anyway, after a few more test runs with different captains and admirals, only once did the Allies achieve surprise -at 28K yards nonetheless [:D], which resulted in another draw (sys dmg in the twenties, float 0 for NJ 2 for Yamato, minor fires).
 
 
conclusions from watching combat animations and checking ammo levels:
 
long range combat does not work, hits at 20k+ yards by both ships do not result in penetration, because they rarely hit the deck, ammo expenditure is very high, with very few (ineffective) hits achieved, so lack of ammo seems to end the engagement (forward magazines are usually empty after a single 1on1 battle). secondary battery scores many hits at absurd ranges (20k yds).
 
imho, night engagements are preferable for both sides if they want a deceisive battle, but they are also more random. main guns seem inaccurate, when they don't remain silent for most of the fight, they quickly run out of ammo. translation: BBs suck, i've seen CAs score hits left, right and center, even on smaller and nimble DDs, while the BBs slug it out with 5" guns, but that's hardly news is it??
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: herwin
Actually, I doubt the radar superiority would have held up very long. It's amazing how much shock damage can be done by a non-penetrating 1 ton+ shell hit. On the other hand, air spotting was a real show-stopper--that's the reason having a small carrier with your battleships was standard practice. If you had an aircraft aloft and the enemy didn't, you didn't need to worry about shock as much.

Actually, it's amazing how much "shock" damage can be caused by simply firing your own weapons when they reach BB calibres. One of the first major "reworkings" of the Yamato designs involved enclosing all the smaller AAA mounts in blast-proof shields to keep the main batteries from killing or injuring their crews in action. Both side's BB's were built with areal spotting A/C included. The US seems to have landed most of theirs as potential fire hazards when it became obvious that other means of spotting were available.
panda124c
Posts: 1517
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Houston, TX, USA

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by panda124c »

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

"Yes, but everybody knows that New Jersey is nothing more than the "the greater Manhatten area", so it might as well be New York..."

Yeah, and south and southwest Florida are naught but boruoughs of NYC itself. It's starting to spread even up into the central Florida "hill" country these days. How are your local rednecks taking to that???

Being a Native FLA, we don't mind just so long as they go home in the summer and leave the money. [:D]
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12472
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Heavyweight bout: Yamato vs. New Jersy

Post by Sardaukar »

How would be SoDak vs. Yamato ? They are at least comparable time-frame designs.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”