Ecuador 95

Norm Koger's The Operational Art of War III is the next game in the award-winning Operational Art of War game series. TOAW3 is updated and enhanced version of the TOAW: Century of Warfare game series. TOAW3 is a turn based game covering operational warfare from 1850-2015. Game scale is from 2.5km to 50km and half day to full week turns. TOAW3 scenarios have been designed by over 70 designers and included over 130 scenarios. TOAW3 comes complete with a full game editor.

Moderators: JAMiAM, ralphtricky

Post Reply
Fidel_Helms
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: North Carolina

Ecuador 95

Post by Fidel_Helms »

I finally got my copy of TOAWIII a few weeks ago and have been sporadically replaying my contribution to the game, "Ecuador 95".

If anyone has played it(solo or PBEM), I'd appreciate any comments. I'm especially interested in the AI's behavior- when I played as the Ecuadoreans, the Peruvian PO was overly cautious, far more so than in the old version. Basically, the Peruvian Army in the coastal deserts just sat on its duff after taking Machala.

I'm going to try and tweak this thing soon to take advantage of TOAWIII improvements and changes.
Fidel_Helms
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: North Carolina

RE: Ecuador 95

Post by Fidel_Helms »

Does anyone have enough experience with the new AI to wager a guess as to why the behavior of the Peruvians has changed so much?  I suppose I could remedy things by tweaking the strategic bias, but I didn't notice this overcautiousness in the COW version, and there have been no changes since then.
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4166
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Ecuador 95

Post by golden delicious »

It's a long time since I looked at the scenario, but are perhaps events in the Andes or on the other side of the Andes making the PO think its in danger of being outflanked?

What's the PO's strategic bias?
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Fidel_Helms
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: North Carolina

RE: Ecuador 95

Post by Fidel_Helms »

ORIGINAL: golden delicious

It's a long time since I looked at the scenario, but are perhaps events in the Andes or on the other side of the Andes making the PO think its in danger of being outflanked?

Possible, if the new PO takes that into account. I was doing rather well in the Amazon basin when I played the Ecuadoreans.
What's the PO's strategic bias?

I don't remember offhand; I think it was the standard setting.
User avatar
golden delicious
Posts: 4166
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: London, Surrey, United Kingdom

RE: Ecuador 95

Post by golden delicious »

ORIGINAL: Fidel_Helms

Possible, if the new PO takes that into account. I was doing rather well in the Amazon basin when I played the Ecuadoreans.

This is one of the major changes to the PO's behaviour. I don't recall exactly what Ralph said, but it was something along the lines of the PO drawing a line perpendicular to the line between its objectives and seeing if enemy forces were astride this line.

How far apart are the two theatres? This could be the problem, but I'm not sure.
I don't remember offhand; I think it was the standard setting.

You could try setting the PO to be more aggressive, then. This might help.
"What did you read at university?"
"War Studies"
"War? Huh. What is it good for?"
"Absolutely nothing."
Fidel_Helms
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: North Carolina

RE: Ecuador 95

Post by Fidel_Helms »

ORIGINAL: golden delicious

How far apart are the two theatres? This could be the problem, but I'm not sure.

If the distance is counted in number of hexes and not scaled, then not very far- probably 15-20 hexes from the coast to the Amazon.

Post Reply

Return to “Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III”