Is this the 'Game To End All Games'?

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Is this the 'Game To End All Games'?

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: Mziln

I agree that impulses are a factor, a veriable factor. Again more than 1 impulse was never mentioned or implied.


If you use my numbers as a base your statement should read:

A land unit with a movement of:
6 would be able to move approximately from 11km to 53km a day depending on 1 to 5 impulses and other veriables.



I did not mention your maps due to them not being part of the RAW. Most people only have the ADG rules to study the game. 

So your map scale has never been an issue.

I am surprised that no one has questioned why I used 4 weeks per month. Management calculates 4 weeks to a month here in the US. 
Management also assumes 5 work days a week, 8 hours per day, and 50 weeks per year (2000 work hours a year), which seem like dubious assumptions on the battlefield.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
oscar72se
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

RE: Is this the 'Game To End All Games'?

Post by oscar72se »

I think that one should consider the fact that movement doesn't only cover the transportation itself. It also includes planning, preparation, setting up communication and supply lines etc. To me the scale and movement speeds in WiF seem to depict the capabilities of WWII corps/divs quite well.

It is a well-balanced and beautifully designed game.
User avatar
coregames
Posts: 470
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Contact:

RE: Is this the 'Game To End All Games'?

Post by coregames »

ORIGINAL: oscar72se

I think that one should consider the fact that movement doesn't only cover the transportation itself. It also includes planning, preparation, setting up communication and supply lines etc. To me the scale and movement speeds in WiF seem to depict the capabilities of WWII corps/divs quite well.

It is a well-balanced and beautifully designed game.

Rowland and Pinder did a lot of research for this game. I think the movement rating of the units was based on how much ground was covered by those units per month in the actual war.
"The creative combination lays bare the presumption of a lie." -- Lasker

Keith Henderson
User avatar
composer99
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Contact:

RE: Is this the 'Game To End All Games'?

Post by composer99 »

ORIGINAL: Missouri_Rebel

I have been following the development of this version of WiF for many months and must say that I am very impressed with the attention to detail that is being displayed. This game is huge it would seem. Even though I have no prior experience with WiF I believe that this game could fill a void for strategic TURN-BASEDWWII era gaming for years to come. Do others feel the same way or is there another simular product that is coming down the line?

mo reb

I would be inclined to agree: WiF seems to me to be currently the final word in grand-strategy scale, hex-based, turn-based WWII wargames.
~ Composer99
User avatar
Mziln
Posts: 667
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma

RE: Is this the 'Game To End All Games'?

Post by Mziln »

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

Management also assumes 5 work days a week, 8 hours per day, and 50 weeks per year (2000 work hours a year), which seem like dubious assumptions on the battlefield.

(4 weeeks x 12 months) x 7 days = 336 days a year (no fractions).

(5 weeeks x 12 months) x 7 days = 420 days a year.


[:D] Management belives (these come from a State of Oklahoma study and I always thought thay were funny): [:D]

(1) You only have 3 productive hours a day.
(2) Good programmers only produce 8 good lines of code a day.
(3) Any changes made to a application should take no longer than it took to write the application initially.


[:D] Programmers belive documentation is unnecessary because: [:D]

(1) If it was hard to code it should be hard to understand.
(2) Lack of documentation provides job security.
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”