To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Graycompany
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:32 am

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by Graycompany »

I always know when he is up to something, because in his email's he stops talking. Instead of the constant[8|] radio traffic, there is radio silence, which means something is about to happen.
I thought this place was a empire, now im the last, I can't be sure...
Image
User avatar
Oznoyng
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Mars

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by Oznoyng »

I would not scuttle the CA's - you don't have to send them to the coasts to repair since they are only 35 durability and you can repair them to operational long before you will get them back.  You have 3 repair yards close by that you can send them.  Auckland, Sydney, and Melbourne are all capable of repairing a 35 durabiility ship - they are not big enough to repair CV's, but they are plenty big enough to repair the CA's.
"There is no Black or White, only shades of Grey."
"If you aren't a part of the solution, you're a part of the problem."
User avatar
RUPD3658
Posts: 6921
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:25 am
Location: East Brunswick, NJ

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by RUPD3658 »

I would not scuttle either one. You only save 10% of the VP so even if they do nothing more than serve as KB or Sub bait they are more usefull afloat.

They will repair fast at a repair yard. I had a Jap CA up to 70 SYS damage and had her back after 4 months in Singapore (Naval HQ helped).
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
User avatar
jwxspoon
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC USA
Contact:

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by jwxspoon »

I don't play for points.  I never scuttle, and always attempt to repair.
 
jw
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by Xargun »

I would save them - even if scuttling removed all VPs I would still save them. Look at it from the Allied point of view - they did not know that the US's ship production would be so plentiful that they could 'waste' ships and they would attempt to save any ship at all... Definately save it. Let it sit somewhere until the flooding / fire is gone then send him on a long trip home to the West Coast. Put her in drydock and forget about her.. In a year you'll have an extra ship.

Xargun
User avatar
Luskan
Posts: 1673
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Down Under

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by Luskan »

Firstly, nobody who has ever played the Japs in this game would ever ask the question "do I scuttle?".  As the japs, you can't afford to scuttle anything - ever.  Even if you only use the cripple to decoy bombers away from the rest of your retreating TF, that 10% of points you lost saved you 100% of the points on the other ships KB would have sunk.
With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?ImageImage
AmiralLaurent
Posts: 3351
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 8:53 pm
Location: Near Paris, France

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by AmiralLaurent »

IRL the main interest in abandoning a ship (and often scuttling it) was saving its crew. For example a DD having 250 crew = the equivalent of 21 squads = 7 troops points... A BB will have 35 troop points of crew or more, a CV up to 70 troops points... so depending of the ship points saved for scuttling should be between 50 and 25% of the VP total.

There were some cases (Yorktown at Midway, Houston off Formosa) where ships were abandonned by most of the crew and only a repair crew remained aboard the ship being towed to safety. But in most of the cases the 'abandon ship' order was followed by orders to scuttle it. The idea behind the scuttling being that it wasn't worth risking other ships to save a wreck.

By the way, to tow a cruiser you need another cruiser, a DD won't be able to tow a CA anywhere. So any "cripple" TF should have at least as many undamaged capital ships as there are crippled ones... and then you have to add DD escorts.
User avatar
Yakface
Posts: 846
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 11:43 am

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by Yakface »

Actually a DD can do a fair job of towing a cruiser so long as the cruiser has some power left the destroyer basically points her in the right direction: http://www.combinedfleet.com/atully07.htm
User avatar
BrucePowers
Posts: 12090
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 6:13 pm

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by BrucePowers »

I would repair them. I think that is what the USN would do. I think about the Arron Ward. These ships were home for these sailors. They would have (and did) fight hard to save them.
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly thankful.

Lieutenant Bush - Captain Horatio Hornblower by C S Forester
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by niceguy2005 »

Amiral Laurent, those are my thoughts as well. I think a commander, in this case would marshal his assets toward saving the ships are crews that had the greatest chance of survival and not risk too much to save those that are in a very questionable state.
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
User avatar
The Gnome
Posts: 1215
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 2:52 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by The Gnome »

Historically speaking, I would think command would try to save the ship unless it looked absolutely hopeless.  Look at the lengths they went to to save ships like the Franklin.  Of course a carrier is a more valuable asset than a cruiser, but they were cranking the CV's out at a very fast pace, and the mentality still seemed to be to save the ship!

As far as myself, I only scuttle if the ship is in imminent danger of sinking in the next turn or two.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16100
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by Mike Solli »

As a Japanese player, I never scuttle a ship.  I once had the Hiryu at 97 flot damage.  I had no hope that she would survive, yet she did.  But, I don't play for points either.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
RUPD3658
Posts: 6921
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:25 am
Location: East Brunswick, NJ

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by RUPD3658 »

I don't know if the bug made it from UV to WiTP but if you scutteld a barge
(normally 0 VP) it would score 1 VP for your opponant. [:@]
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: To scuttle a CA or not, that is the question

Post by niceguy2005 »

There is a triage issue here. I can say no more here now, but will comment on it in my AAR.
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”