Escorting Transport Aircraft

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Icedawg »

Can anyone tell me how to escort transport aircraft assigned to airdrop missions?

I like to use my two para regiments on the first few days of scenario 17 to secure unoccupied Allied bases that can serve as handy little fighter airfields (to cover my transport task forces bound for Palembang and Java). I've been thinking of using them instead to drop onto lightly manned (as opposed to unoccupied) bases. But, if I do this, I want to make sure they are properly escorted.

I did one quick little experimental (suicidal?) drop from (already secured) Toboali to Batavia. I had no intention of actually capturing that base, but just wanted to see how the routine worked - or more accurately, didn't work! I had airdropped most of the 1st Para regiment onto Toboali and transported part of an aviation support unit, a few air transport units and a fighter squadron. I then tried airdropping onto Batavia and got a quick message that the transports had been intercepted. There was no air-air combat however between the interceptors and my escorts.

I reran the turn a few times thinking it was just a fluke and got similar results. In every instance, there was no opportunity for my escorts to defend the transports. The escorts were clearly within range (zeros with range set to 11 hexes) and were assigned escort mission with 0% CAP. What's up here? Why can't fighters escort transports?
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

Can anyone tell me how to escort transport aircraft assigned to airdrop missions?

I like to use my two para regiments on the first few days of scenario 17 to secure unoccupied Allied bases that can serve as handy little fighter airfields (to cover my transport task forces bound for Palembang and Java). I've been thinking of using them instead to drop onto lightly manned (as opposed to unoccupied) bases. But, if I do this, I want to make sure they are properly escorted.

I did one quick little experimental (suicidal?) drop from (already secured) Toboali to Batavia. I had no intention of actually capturing that base, but just wanted to see how the routine worked - or more accurately, didn't work! I had airdropped most of the 1st Para regiment onto Toboali and transported part of an aviation support unit, a few air transport units and a fighter squadron. I then tried airdropping onto Batavia and got a quick message that the transports had been intercepted. There was no air-air combat however between the interceptors and my escorts.

I reran the turn a few times thinking it was just a fluke and got similar results. In every instance, there was no opportunity for my escorts to defend the transports. The escorts were clearly within range (zeros with range set to 11 hexes) and were assigned escort mission with 0% CAP. What's up here? Why can't fighters escort transports?

Fighter jocks hate transport jocks? [X(]

More likely, the designers forgot to code for it, and/or didn't think it was worth it. At any rate, it does not seem to be possible (see also the current "wish list" thread...)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Nikademus »

Transport missions are not escorted. If your going to attempt a drop near (or on) a base defended by fighters you should probably conduct a few sweep operations before-hand to ensure that at least their strength is diminished. Overall it shouldn't be too much of an issue though since transport-fighter interactions were de-fanged.
User avatar
Icedawg
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:55 pm
Location: Upstate New York

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Icedawg »

Thanks guys.

So the take-home message is: "You can't escort transports (rtrapasso), but you don't need to worry since the losses they take from CAP are minimal (Nikademus)."?

I can live with that, although it does seem to be a bit weird/unrealistic.

User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

Thanks guys.

So the take-home message is: "You can't escort transports (rtrapasso), but you don't need to worry since the losses they take from CAP are minimal (Nikademus)."?

I can live with that, although it does seem to be a bit weird/unrealistic.


Be sure to run those sweeps, or you might find they are not so minimal...

Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Speedysteve »

Indeed.
 
I've seen P38's eat swarms of Japanese transports for dinner............
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

Thanks guys.

So the take-home message is: "You can't escort transports (rtrapasso), but you don't need to worry since the losses they take from CAP are minimal (Nikademus)."?

I can live with that, although it does seem to be a bit weird/unrealistic.


Be sure to run those sweeps, or you might find they are not so minimal...


True.....the disruption from landing alone can be signifigant. My current record is 12 transport planes downed (due to the KB being next to the target hex)
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by m10bob »

Nik is right (as usual) about those sweeps. Just treat any parachute drop zone like Sicily, (presuming enemy presence), and be glad you won't be hit by your own ships![8D]
Image

User avatar
RUPD3658
Posts: 6921
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:25 am
Location: East Brunswick, NJ

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by RUPD3658 »

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Indeed.

I've seen P38's eat swarms of Japanese transports for dinner............


I've lost them to P-35s and I-16s. Sad really. [:(]
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by niceguy2005 »

Losses during any air transport can be siginificant if fighter cover is heavy. I airlifted in elements of the 1st USMC to a blockaded Canton Is. and had a couple of days where very few AC made it through. Sweeps are very important.
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
rokohn
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:59 pm
Location: California

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by rokohn »

The ideal situation that the allies always tried for was total enemy fighter suppression.  The best way to do this was to make sure the enemy planes were nothing more than scrap metal.  In the case of Overlord and the Arnhem operations, there were no fighter planes around to offer any resistance.  In the Pacific, the Americans would take weeks/months to isolate any target and destroy any air and naval resistance before invading.  Guadalcanal was not the way America wanted to invade enemy territory, it was definately a shoe-string operation.
 
I know the Japanese do not always have this option, so fighter sweeps seem to be the best alternative.
Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
. . .
Do not rebuke a mocker or he will hate you;
rebuke a wise man and he will love you.
Instruct a wise man and he will be wiser still;
teach a righteous man and he will add to his learning.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Nikademus »

Well there were TWO planes around for Overlord on the German side. [:D]
bradfordkay
Posts: 8658
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by bradfordkay »

Another option would be LRCAP over the target base. I  try to use a combination, with the first choice being LRCAP (the second squadron chosen gets to run a sweep).
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Mynok »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

Well there were TWO planes around for Overlord on the German side. [:D]

[:D][:D][:D]
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
Sonny
Posts: 2005
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 9:51 pm

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Sonny »

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

Another option would be LRCAP over the target base. I try to use a combination, with the first choice being LRCAP (the second squadron chosen gets to run a sweep).

Maybe I missed something but when I tried this my LRCAP did nothing as far as escorting my transports.
Quote from Snigbert -

"If you mess with the historical accuracy, you're going to have ahistorical outcomes."

"I'll say it again for Sonny's sake: If you mess with historical accuracy, you're going to have
ahistorical outcomes. "
bradfordkay
Posts: 8658
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by bradfordkay »

Neither will a sweep, but either can cause combat with the enemy CAP, though after thinking about it I believe that a sweep is more likely to cause that combat.
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by niceguy2005 »

That is the purpose of a sweep.
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
Sonny
Posts: 2005
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 9:51 pm

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Sonny »

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

Neither will a sweep, but either can cause combat with the enemy CAP, though after thinking about it I believe that a sweep is more likely to cause that combat.

CAP fighting LRCAP? That is what I thought did not work.
Quote from Snigbert -

"If you mess with the historical accuracy, you're going to have ahistorical outcomes."

"I'll say it again for Sonny's sake: If you mess with historical accuracy, you're going to have
ahistorical outcomes. "
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12714
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Escorting Transport Aircraft

Post by Sardaukar »

LRCAP will not fight CAP. Sweep will, even though it's not 100 % sure to cause combat.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”