ORIGINAL: HansBolter
ORIGINAL: alaric99x
Sorry I started all this. It was just meant to be a little joke. "Yes, a very little joke," all the Brits are saying.
Eddy, I don't know where you got that from, but I like it.
What's to be sorry for?
We're just having some good natured fun.
I have a tendency to poke fun in a tongue-in-cheek manner, aimed as much at myself and my culture, as at others.
I learned a long time ago the importance of being able to laugh at yourself and your culture and not take yourself, or your culture too seriously.
Interesting questions to ponder.
My profession and one of my many passions throughout my life are graphic art oriented. I design buildings for a living and am an amatuer portrait painter. One of the graphic art courses I took in college utilized a text book titled Exercises in Visual Thinking.
The gest of the book was that before we acquire this communicative tool we call language we start off in life thinking in visual images, rather than in words, as we have no words. As we come to rely on this magnificent tool called language we allow our ability to think visually to atrophy. Those who display an inate talent for artistic expression seem to maintain a stronger hold on the ability to think visually than those who display no such artistic inclinations. The course was designed to get students back in touch with their ability to think visually.
The ability to think visually, rather than verbally, can be both a boon and a bane. I gave a talk to my local astronomy club a few years ago on the subject of cosmology (two more of my passions) where I explained the difficulties I have in understanding cosmological concepts when the scientists use terminology that, for me, invoke incorrect imagery. When physicists decided to categorize the different characteristics of quarks, they chose words like "green", "up", "down", "strange", and denoted that quarks had non-integer "spin" denoting them as "+2/3", "-1/3", etc.....and then go on to state that it isn't REALLY "spin", they just chose the word "spin" as a categorizing moniker. [8|]
As you can imagine, for some one who strives to understand things by visualizing them, this kind of visually incorrect nomenclature is cause for serious brian knots. I wish they had made up new words to describe these characteristics rather than choosing words that evoke incorrect imagery........
geeze where the heck am I going with this early morning ramble......who knows?
anyway, the mention of language as it relates to how we see the word and our place in it got me to thinking again on the subject.........[:)]