Questions from someone considering buying..
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: pauk
Me and SPAM[&:][:-]
Yeah, Spammer!
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
- rogueusmc
- Posts: 4583
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 6:21 pm
- Location: Texas...what country are YOU from?
- Contact:
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
I chose life for a while...it was overrated...[:D]ORIGINAL: Ursa MAior
ORIGINAL: flipperwasirish
ORIGINAL: tanksone
Hi, I think everyone else has summed it up pretty well. If the price is what's stopping you then think of it this way. It's the cheapest war game I've ever played because of all the time I've played it. Since it came I usually play it 3-7 days a week, depends on life. Lucky for me my wife is very understanding. Not to brag too much but how many wifes will bring dinner and or beer to you while your playing.
![]()
Life or WITP...that is the question of the ages...
Flipper
Yep. I had to choose life. Still not fully recovered from loosing WitP.
Lee
There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.
Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army

RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: Terminus
Don't make me lodge a formal complaint against you!
Anyhoo, to stay sort of on topic, WitP is THE GAME if you're interested in the Pacific War. It's got plenty of warts, but it's also got a huge fan base and continued support from the company behind it. Becoming part of this community was one of the better computer gaming-related decisions I've ever made.
Just don't plan on having a life on the side...[;)]
It IS a matter of PUBLIC RECORD!!..You are a troll Terminus!![&o]
OOPS..I mean......[:'(]

RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
If I actually was the spammer and troll that I'm accused of being, I'd never have been able to accumulate as many posts as it's taken for people to assume that I'm a spammer and troll... So neener to you![:'(]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: Terminus
If I actually was the spammer and troll that I'm accused of being, I'd never have been able to accumulate as many posts as it's taken for people to assume that I'm a spammer and troll... So neener to you![:'(]
damn color-blindness...now, was this the green button or this one over he................

RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
Buy the game, I bought it a 2 months ago. World War two Pacific is may favorite theater of operation for WW2. It has the beauty of the massive Pacific War board game with a computer doing all the maual work. Just remember you have the knowledge of history on your side. The game flows quite well.
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
Well, it sounds enthralling boys.
Still having a hard time deciding.
- BrucePowers
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 6:13 pm
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
Good luck with the decision. Please let us know what you decided.
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly thankful.
Lieutenant Bush - Captain Horatio Hornblower by C S Forester
Lieutenant Bush - Captain Horatio Hornblower by C S Forester
- MineSweeper
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:03 pm
- Location: Nags Head, NC
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
Hey FredK, good to see you over here!
I had a question for you all, how does War Plan Orange stack up? I NEVER hear anybody talk about it (is this a bad thing)? I like that time period and it seem to be a nice idea, anyway.
I don't own WiTP, but I do own its little bro UV. I'm still trying to learn it (I'm not sure that I agree with this "anybody can learn" idea). It is not so much the interface (although trying to figure out what the heck all the different settings mean is something that I could use help with) it is the general strategy and specific unit tactics that I have problems with. The AAR read a bit like radio manuals to me. Any starter's guides?
And Terminus, despite the fact that your posts are steeped in acrimony... that avatar of Calvin's father generally evokes a certain voice in my head that makes everything you say seem like "fatherly advice" (or at least the dubious advice Calvin's father gives him). [:D]
Son of Montfort
I had a question for you all, how does War Plan Orange stack up? I NEVER hear anybody talk about it (is this a bad thing)? I like that time period and it seem to be a nice idea, anyway.
I don't own WiTP, but I do own its little bro UV. I'm still trying to learn it (I'm not sure that I agree with this "anybody can learn" idea). It is not so much the interface (although trying to figure out what the heck all the different settings mean is something that I could use help with) it is the general strategy and specific unit tactics that I have problems with. The AAR read a bit like radio manuals to me. Any starter's guides?
And Terminus, despite the fact that your posts are steeped in acrimony... that avatar of Calvin's father generally evokes a certain voice in my head that makes everything you say seem like "fatherly advice" (or at least the dubious advice Calvin's father gives him). [:D]
Son of Montfort
"Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet!"
(Kill them all. God will know his own.)
-- Arnaud-Armaury, the Albigensian Crusade
(Kill them all. God will know his own.)
-- Arnaud-Armaury, the Albigensian Crusade
-
bradfordkay
- Posts: 8686
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
- Location: Olympia, WA
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
War Plan Orange plays through much more quickly since there isn't a ton of aircraft out searching. I can play through a week of WPO turns in the time it takes to play one WITP turn. WPO will make you better at handling surface combat task forces (figuring out how to put them where they will actually intercept the enemy), but - in the early going at least - there are a lot of turns where nothing happens at all.
UV also plays a lot more quickly than WITP, because there is so much less involved. It is a good way to get used to the business of WITP, as the campaign area is concentrated to the point that you will have carrier combat sooner than later...
I love all three games, WITP most of all. Since I finally took on a PBEM in WITP, I have been alternating between WPO and UV for my game playing while waiting for my PBEM turns to arrive. When I find myself trying to scroll beyond the edges of the UV map, I switch to WPO. When WPO starts to seem like a whole lot of nothing (the AI is very conservative, apparently), I switch back to UV.
UV also plays a lot more quickly than WITP, because there is so much less involved. It is a good way to get used to the business of WITP, as the campaign area is concentrated to the point that you will have carrier combat sooner than later...
I love all three games, WITP most of all. Since I finally took on a PBEM in WITP, I have been alternating between WPO and UV for my game playing while waiting for my PBEM turns to arrive. When I find myself trying to scroll beyond the edges of the UV map, I switch to WPO. When WPO starts to seem like a whole lot of nothing (the AI is very conservative, apparently), I switch back to UV.
fair winds,
Brad
Brad
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: Fredk
Still a bit disappointed that you can't really expect the Japanese player to win though, seems like it would take a bit of fun out of the PBEM games.
Depends on whether you mean winning the game or winning the war. I don't think there is anyone out there (with the benefit of 20/20 hind sight) that will say that the Japanese ever stood a chance in real life. Not the way it was fought anyway!!
Cheers,
Reg.
(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
Reg.
(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: Reg
ORIGINAL: Fredk
Still a bit disappointed that you can't really expect the Japanese player to win though, seems like it would take a bit of fun out of the PBEM games.
Depends on whether you mean winning the game or winning the war. I don't think there is anyone out there (with the benefit of 20/20 hind sight) that will say that the Japanese ever stood a chance in real life. Not the way it was fought anyway!!
I agree..If Yamamoto himself had major misgivings prior to Pearl Harbor, IF the Allies were still committed, then one might suspect a certain historical path might be followed?
If failing to attain a certain "victory" is a disappointment, the Japanese player still won't see that for maybe 18-24 months of real-time, (allowing for bathroom breaks, tending to the spouse/neighbor,etc, and eating).
Still more time involved in this game than reading WAR AND PEACE...
Too, it will give one the "ticket to ride" this great forum and meet very interesting people, (and a couple 'o "neer-do-wells").[;)]

RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: Terminus
Wow! What do you have to do to get her to do that?
Well...even 10% of attention towards wifey pays 100% back... Women like to be appreciated and not ignored. Thus, if you treat one right, she tends to be very nice when you want time of your own...[;)] One-syllable answers to questions and not enuff cuddles tend to get you very peeved wifey. Every wife/gf carries an invisible trashcan with them where they store all the insults & hurts (real or imaginary)..and when it gets full they empty it on you... So it's better to be nice than sorry...leaves more time for gaming too...door swings both ways, so to say...[:D].
OK, end of "Sardaukar's Lesson 1 for those planning to live with a woman". [:D]
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
I agree..If Yamamoto himself had major misgivings prior to Pearl Harbor, IF the Allies were still committed, then one might suspect a certain historical path might be followed?
If failing to attain a certain "victory" is a disappointment, the Japanese player still won't see that for maybe 18-24 months of real-time, (allowing for bathroom breaks, tending to the spouse/neighbor,etc, and eating).
Haha, well, some people earlier in the thread explained how the 'victory' system works and, like I said earlier in the thread, if you want to stay true to the logistics of the historical campaign of course there is no way the Japanese are going to 'win'. Just curious if it is possible in a game between roughly equal opponents for the japanese player to force a "draw" via the victory system?
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: Fredk
I agree..If Yamamoto himself had major misgivings prior to Pearl Harbor, IF the Allies were still committed, then one might suspect a certain historical path might be followed?
If failing to attain a certain "victory" is a disappointment, the Japanese player still won't see that for maybe 18-24 months of real-time, (allowing for bathroom breaks, tending to the spouse/neighbor,etc, and eating).
Haha, well, some people earlier in the thread explained how the 'victory' system works and, like I said earlier in the thread, if you want to stay true to the logistics of the historical campaign of course there is no way the Japanese are going to 'win'. Just curious if it is possible in a game between roughly equal opponents for the japanese player to force a "draw" via the victory system?
Yes....Several longtime forum members have reportedly done it..

RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: Reg
Depends on whether you mean winning the game or winning the war. I don't think there is anyone out there (with the benefit of 20/20 hind sight) that will say that the Japanese ever stood a chance in real life. Not the way it was fought anyway!!
Even the most optimistic of Japan's leaders never expected to conquer the US. They mistakenly believed that if they hit the US Pacific forces hard enough, the US would roll over and give up. To an outsider, unfamiliar with the American psyche, it makes sense. The issolationists were a very strong force in American politics in the 30s.
The Japanese were trying to force the issolationsists into predominance. Their plan backfired completely because they didn't fundamentally understand the American psyche. If they had bothered to study the causes of the Spanish American War they might have reconsidered.
Japan just doesn't have a large enough popuation to take large swaths of territory. Their control in China was tenuous because they didn't have enough troops to cover everything. I couldn't find any population statistics online, but I have an atlas of WW II with mobilization numbers:
China 5 million
US 11.49 million
Australia 680,000
India 2.4 million
New Zealand 150,000
UK 4.6 million
Japan 7.4 million
China and India's troops were generally low quality and the US and UK deployed the majority of their troops in Europe. However, the Allies had a lot of warm bodies with guns. That's before taking into account that the US was producing 50% of the world's manufactured goods in 1940 and that grew during the war.
It also doesn't take into account the Soviet Union and the threat they posed to Manchuko. The Japanese fought the Soviets in a short war in 1940 and the Red Army of the period, who lost to Finland in the Winter War, got the upper hand against Japan fairly quickly. I have heard it said that the biggest concern Japan had in August 1945 was not US nuclear weapons, but the Soviets who had just jumped into the war.
A game that would give Japan a chance to dominate the entire map covered by WitP would be very unrealistic. The Germans and the Japanese took virtually all their territory early when the Allies were unprepared for defense. After the Allies got organized and got war production going, it wasn't a fair fight. The war went on as long as it did because the Axis powers had stubborn leadership and they played defense well.
Churchill's first comment upon hearing of Pearl Harbor was, "so we have won after all."
Bill
WIS Development Team
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
ORIGINAL: Sardaukar
Well...even 10% of attention towards wifey pays 100% back... Women like to be appreciated and not ignored. Thus, if you treat one right, she tends to be very nice when you want time of your own...[;)] One-syllable answers to questions and not enuff cuddles tend to get you very peeved wifey. Every wife/gf carries an invisible trashcan with them where they store all the insults & hurts (real or imaginary)..and when it gets full they empty it on you... So it's better to be nice than sorry...leaves more time for gaming too...door swings both ways, so to say...[:D].
OK, end of "Sardaukar's Lesson 1 for those planning to live with a woman". [:D]
Believe it or not, my So doesn't store up stuff. She says it takes too much work to remain angry. She does get upset with me once in a while (no relationship is perfect 24/7), but she never remembers the next day.
She does have a minimum quota for attention though. One requirement is to hang out after dinner for a while. I don't have to be paying her 100% attention, but she wants me there. She discovered Shockwave games about 2 months ago and has been playing those like mad. I've discovered that she's perfectly happy if I'm playing WitP on one laptop while she's playing her Shockwave games on hers. While the computer is processing my turn, I can lean over and help her with her game, which she appreciates. She also likes to get through a game as fast as possible.
It also helps that we are in very close agreement on all major issues: money, family, etc. That starts off with a solid foundation.
Need to run off to Home Depot with the SO for a project she's working on...
Bill
WIS Development Team
RE: Questions from someone considering buying..
Well folks, I just wanted to come back and thank everyone for their excellent input on this thread.
Sadly, I think I'll have to pass on WitP as the moment, more due to my personality than anything else. When I experience bugs that are relatively obvious (on the level of the leader/replay, etc. bugs) they tend to ruin the game for me - even if i'm enjoying it. I hope that makes sense. If anybody has playing the Football Manager (WWSM in N. America) series I it is a good analogy - I have a lot of fun playing the game and the bugs aren't really show stoppers but the nagging feeling that something isn't quite right under the hood tends to make me quit playing.
In any case, I'd like to congratulate the designers/programmers on their ambition to create such an epic game and the player base on both its passions for gaming and history. Maybe if hte WitP "Deluxe" idea that was muted in a thread comes about or there is a major patch I'll come back to it. The concept is certainly one of the most fascinating I've run across. Also I'm sure I'll drop by from time to time to enjoy the bizarre off topic offerings of the WitP crew! [:)]
Sadly, I think I'll have to pass on WitP as the moment, more due to my personality than anything else. When I experience bugs that are relatively obvious (on the level of the leader/replay, etc. bugs) they tend to ruin the game for me - even if i'm enjoying it. I hope that makes sense. If anybody has playing the Football Manager (WWSM in N. America) series I it is a good analogy - I have a lot of fun playing the game and the bugs aren't really show stoppers but the nagging feeling that something isn't quite right under the hood tends to make me quit playing.
In any case, I'd like to congratulate the designers/programmers on their ambition to create such an epic game and the player base on both its passions for gaming and history. Maybe if hte WitP "Deluxe" idea that was muted in a thread comes about or there is a major patch I'll come back to it. The concept is certainly one of the most fascinating I've run across. Also I'm sure I'll drop by from time to time to enjoy the bizarre off topic offerings of the WitP crew! [:)]










