Critics on TOAW
Moderators: ralphtricky, JAMiAM
Critics on TOAW
Critics on TOAW. I discovered this very negative critics on TOAW in another forum:
http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=7;t=002167I´m quite a newbie, but I would like to hear how the experts think on this critics. For me TOAW loooks very flexible and realistic on the operation level.
http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=7;t=002167I´m quite a newbie, but I would like to hear how the experts think on this critics. For me TOAW loooks very flexible and realistic on the operation level.
RE: Critics on TOAW
[X(] Not sure if you will get a very fair and balanced view here. Most of us paid for the game, and a majority has paid more than once, and would pay again. What does this mean? Between the pro's and con's, this is one of the very few games I have had installed since the day I first bought it a looooong time ago, and this can only mean it's good, very good!
RE: Critics on TOAW
Wow. Have these guys even played the game for more than five minutes? It looks like they haven't.
To repeat history in a game is to be predictable.
If you wish to learn more about EA, feel free to pop over to the EA forums Europe Aflame Forums.
If you wish to learn more about EA, feel free to pop over to the EA forums Europe Aflame Forums.

- Monkeys Brain
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:24 pm
RE: Critics on TOAW
ORIGINAL: freeboy
funny comming from a bf forum
The writer is smart and kind of want to look like some intellectual but then shoot himself in the foot by saying that TOAW is completely broken and unplayable. Of course that TOAW is not perfect but it does well some things.
BTW interesting postings there, poster than continues to amaze us with his so big knowledge of computer and board wargames and then spell out what other have done better in other games. Yawn. Maybe he wants to lump all that together.
In fact maybe TOAW is not so realistic in some things but it is very playable and it is computer game and not West Point wargame simulation of Medieval II : Total War lol
Eh, I am so amazed by Medieval II that I mention it all the time haha.
Mario
RE: Critics on TOAW
After reading these particular gems of inanity, it took all the willpower I could muster, to continue reading the rest of the author's (JasonC) screed...
They clearly show a complete misunderstanding of how things work in TOAW. At least, in the state it has been in, for the last seven years.
Attacks are best conducted as mega overstack affairs at about 10 to 1 odds. No, the concentration penalties do not remotely forbid this.
Supply is so uncontrollable, the only way to actually manage it is to deploy some units so far from the action they won't have occasion to draw it. ...
None of the combined arms relationships of the real weapons are seriously present. Instead, units are bags of diversified combat power, supply and quality dependent to be sure, but not equipment dependent in any serious way.
They clearly show a complete misunderstanding of how things work in TOAW. At least, in the state it has been in, for the last seven years.
RE: Critics on TOAW
Supply is so uncontrollable, the only way to actually manage it is to deploy some units so far from the action they won't have occasion to draw it. ...
Lol..i found this one extraordinarily amusing.
RE: Critics on TOAW
Awesome. [:D]
To repeat history in a game is to be predictable.
If you wish to learn more about EA, feel free to pop over to the EA forums Europe Aflame Forums.
If you wish to learn more about EA, feel free to pop over to the EA forums Europe Aflame Forums.

- ralphtricky
- Posts: 6675
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:05 am
- Location: Colorado Springs
- Contact:
RE: Critics on TOAW
That's hilarious![&o][&o]
Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.
RE: Critics on TOAW
Being a CM player also I saw this yesterday. It is TOAW from a CM point of view. Might as well talk about a pickup truck from a sport's car point of view. Both vehicles but very different. Seems like those guys don't have an clue but are trying to impress each other with how little they know.
- Monkeys Brain
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:24 pm
- Monkeys Brain
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:24 pm
RE: Critics on TOAW
ORIGINAL: rich12545
Being a CM player also I saw this yesterday. It is TOAW from a CM point of view. Might as well talk about a pickup truck from a sport's car point of view. Both vehicles but very different. Seems like those guys don't have an clue but are trying to impress each other with how little they know.
I like Battlefront forum it is really funny sometimes. BTW, he is telling something that TACOPS is really great game and TOAW isn't (reading between the lines). I don't know - never tried the TACOPS's but didn't heard that it is so good. So I am suspicious in this guy reasoning.
Combat Mission quite contrary is great series of games.
And their upcoming Theatre of War will be game everyone will be talking about soon.
-
SMK-at-work
- Posts: 3396
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: New Zealand
RE: Critics on TOAW
no it is not TOAW from a BF pov - I also play BF and have no problems with ToaW.
It is the poster JasonC who is at fault - he is a prima donna - if everything isn't perfect then it is completely broken - he is a fan of hyperbole and this is a typical case of him playing with himself - not worth worrying about.
It is the poster JasonC who is at fault - he is a prima donna - if everything isn't perfect then it is completely broken - he is a fan of hyperbole and this is a typical case of him playing with himself - not worth worrying about.
Meum est propisitum in taberna mori
RE: Critics on TOAW
ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work
...It is the poster JasonC who is at fault - he is a prima donna - if everything isn't perfect then it is completely broken - he is a fan of hyperbole and this is a typical case of him playing with himself - not worth worrying about.
That dud redwolf is another legend in his own mind over there. If you don't like a game, at least be able to critique it intelligently - a trait that is obviously lacking in that thread.
I'll try being nicer if you try being less stupid. - anon
RE: Critics on TOAW
Consider myself a serious player of all types of wargames for 20+ years and since I first started playing TOAWIII about a year ago have not been able to be away from it more than a couple days before starting withdrawal symptoms. The incredible number of scenerios from very small size to massive(FITE,etc), prevent boredom from becoming over familiar with the tricks and gamey aspects that creep into some of the other really good games with time. Have not had the time to play several other games I've bought such as GG A World Divided,Forge of Freedom and WITP. So many games and so little time. I would like to see if possible better similation of sea and air combat but as a whole the game in my opinion has great value and is well worth buying. Also the forum is very active and its easy to find opponents for PBEM. A truly great game.
- ralphtricky
- Posts: 6675
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:05 am
- Location: Colorado Springs
- Contact:
RE: Critics on TOAW
Did you see the thread that redwolf mentioned? I'm wondering if it had any more substance. That thread was pretty entertaining.ORIGINAL: rich12545
Being a CM player also I saw this yesterday. It is TOAW from a CM point of view. Might as well talk about a pickup truck from a sport's car point of view. Both vehicles but very different. Seems like those guys don't have an clue but are trying to impress each other with how little they know.
Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.
RE: Critics on TOAW
ORIGINAL: ralphtrick
Did you see the thread that redwolf mentioned? I'm wondering if it had any more substance. That thread was pretty entertaining.ORIGINAL: rich12545
Being a CM player also I saw this yesterday. It is TOAW from a CM point of view. Might as well talk about a pickup truck from a sport's car point of view. Both vehicles but very different. Seems like those guys don't have an clue but are trying to impress each other with how little they know.
Nope. Didn't see it. I play only CMAK and Tacops from Battlefront and since they are done I don't spend so much time there anymore. Just happened to see the one thread yesterday.
And for Monkey's Brain, Tacops is a very good game. WeGo like CM. Units are a bit larger. Graphics aren't as good. All modern units. No random generator but more than enough scenarios. It's so good the military from at least three countries use it for training. The dev is a retired Marine major. And there's a demo. Certainly worth a look.
- Monkeys Brain
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:24 pm
RE: Critics on TOAW
And for Monkey's Brain, Tacops is a very good game. WeGo like CM. Units are a bit larger. Graphics aren't as good. All modern units. No random generator but more than enough scenarios. It's so good the military from at least three countries use it for training. The dev is a retired Marine major. And there's a demo. Certainly worth a look.
Thanks.
Major H is old buddy from wargaming Usenet group and Gamesquads forum. [;)]




